![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34
|
FTC Seeks Public Comment on Adult Content Spam Rule
For Release: January 28, 2004
FTC Seeks Public Comment on Adult Content Spam Rule As required by the CAN-SPAM Act, the Federal Trade Commission today announced a proposal to establish a mark or notice that will be required for inclusion in spam that contains sexually oriented material. The purpose of the mark or notice is to inform the recipient that a spam message contains sexually oriented material and to facilitate filtering of such spam messages. Establishment of a mark to accomplish these purposes is one of several actions that Congress has directed the Commission to undertake by enacting the CAN-SPAM Act, which was signed into law on December 16, 2003. A Federal Register Notice to be published shortly will seek public comment on the proposal. The CAN-SPAM Act requires the Commission to prescribe the mark or notice within 120 days after passage of the Act. Because of the statutory deadline, the comment period ends on February 17. The FTC proposes to adopt a rule prescribing the phrase ?SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT-CONTENT: ? as the mark or notice mandated by the CAN-SPAM Act. The proposed rule also would follow the intention of the CAN-SPAM Act to protect consumers from unwitting exposure to pornographic images in spam, by requiring this mark to be included both in the subject line of any e-mail message that contains sexually oriented material, and in the electronic equivalent of a ?brown paper wrapper? in the body of the message. This ?brown paper wrapper? would be what a recipient would initially see when opening a message containing sexually oriented material. It would include the prescribed mark or notice, certain other specified information, and no other information or images. The proposed rule would include a ?definitions? section to clarify that certain terms taken from the Act and appearing in the rule have the definitions prescribed by particular referenced sections of the Act. Finally, the proposed rule would include a severability provision, so that in the event a portion of the rule is struck, the remainder of the rule will stay in effect. The Commission vote to approve publication of the Federal Register notice was 5-0. Questions or comments can be directed to [email protected] or to Jonathan Kraden at 202-326-2614. Copies of the federal register notice are available from the FTC?s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC?s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint, or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1 877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at http://www.ftc.gov. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. MEDIA CONTACT: Claudia Bourne Farrell, Office of Public Affairs 202-326-2181 (http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/01/adult.htm) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 991
|
It doesnt sound like a bad idea.
With tags like that, it should be easy for people to filter. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 239
|
I'm all fucking for it
![]()
__________________
blah blah blah... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London - UK
Posts: 2,851
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
copyright violation
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |