The only reason I can think of parents would abuse their children like this is when they are in huge financial problems. But then still it's very wrong

I hope this shit won't last long....

btw that sandra model site doesn't load for me, it seems to be taken down allready? hopefully it is...

100 people disgusted at disguised child porn


that is sick and should be taken down asap :repuke

:321GFY

death penalty anyone?

I've skimmed over a few of the threads on the forum... there seems to be a recurring theme about "Tyler" and her excessive pubes. One thread mentions she is considering shaving them. This is a 12 year old girl!!!

I found one of the preview photos for Sandra to be quite disturbing. Either there is a crease in the material of her underpants due to her stance, or they are see-thru and it's the top of her labia. If it is a crease then I'm sure that particular image being chosen as the preview was no accident. If it's the real thing, well....

That thread about the dream date is fucking creepy.

I don't think there's any point in dwelling on the legalities of this site if you really want to do something.. let's just report them then get onto the real solution, I think time would be better spent going after their moralistic vulnerabilities.. rackshack, the domain server, their ip server. Surely there's something that can be done in one of these areas.

wtf

hey now, university is expensive these days

sick sick fucking sick!!

That link is dead for me... Did anyone take it down already...

Anyway, for what you guys are saying I'd just like to say thank you to whoever took that site down... :thumbsup

*Reported*


.....sick fuckin bastards :BangBang:

http://pub42.ezboard.com/fams10829fr...icID=473.topic

What they are saying in that thread .. There has gotta be some shit INSIDE the members area that is grey area if not definate child porn.

"I've always liked the semi-transparent dress/skirt/top with lighting from the rear. Kind'a peek-a-boo effect! Just a thought, butt with her legs the effect would be dazzzzzling.............. "

:BangBang: :ak47: :321GFY

:throwup

One of the pics was cameltoe in full effect, left very little to fantasize about. If any.

I reported the site too, but I'm sure it is useless, as it will still be here next year.

one of her lips is hanging out on the main page. the parents are the ones to blame.

These nonnude sites are pretty common. Not illegal as far as I know but frowned upon. And running one would definitely put you on the pedo watchlist.

Man I wish I didnt click on that :( I saw a whole special on one of the news programs about this - it's legal and the parents make money off it - SICK!!!!!! :321GFY :mad: :feels-hot

There was a piece done on this subject about a year ago. I don't remember what program it was or what network (I think it was 20/20). The story followed a mother and her 12 yo daughter around to these different photo shoots where the kid was piratically naked and the interviewer questioned the mother and scummy photographers and asked how they could do this.

What it all boils down to is that these parents are sick and will jeopardize their child for $$$, and it's completely legal with parents consent.

The story also explained and exposed that these sick photographers are also raping and taking naked pictures of these kids...fucking sick.

what's sad is that there's a whole chain of these sites :Oh crap

site is down

looks like the site is down anyhow

site is up now

that's sick :repuke

the pedo sexed is probably jerking off now on those sites at this moment.

That's just wrong, but it's not kiddie porn.

you're right DirtyWhiteBoy, it's not kiddie porn.. it's worse than that.. it's legal child abuse, where some slick ass dipshit figured out how to slip through the loopholes in the law... that's why I said it'd be better to get to this webmaster through other channels, because loopholes go both ways.. he's playing dirty, so he shouldn't be surprised if someone plays dirty back.

and yes... I am suggesting something here :eatmouse

That really is pathetic. :ak47:

A lot of little girls want to grow up to be famous...they see Britney Spears and dream that one day they will look like that and everyone will adore them.

You see 14 and 15 year old models on the runway half naked...but it is considered "ok" because they are modeling and it is not about sex, it is about the clothes...well..that is what they say anyways.

Some parents want their children to succeed, to become famous...some try to live their lives through their children..like those junior pagents where the 5 year olds have so much makeup on they look like they are 18.

Underwear showing "your daughter may be asked to model underwear for a catalogue, we need shots of her like that"...the parents see what they want to see...yes...it is to show how they can model underwear...not for sicko's interested in little ones....yep...say it enough times to yourself and you end up believing it.

Then there are the scumbag photographers who prey not only on the children but their dimwitted parents...trying to make them believe that their child will be a world famous model or actress...she will have her own website...millions of people will see her....we will set up contact info for people to hire her for modeling or movies...oh yes....it sounds so good.

But none of the parents stop to think who is actually buying memberships. Would a high end talent agent pay to see pics of their daughter? No! So who is exactly PAYING to see your daughter? They just never stop to think.

I'm sure some of the parents are real scumbags that know exactly what is going on..but others are dillusional thinking they are doing everything in their power to make their child famous....it is a sad, sad situation....too bad you don't have to pass an IQ and EQ test before you are allowed to breed.

that's sick.

wyldblyss, most probably you are right

Most people here agree that this isn't kiddy porn. I'd have to agree too. But as I said, it's pretty damn close. What about child exploitation? I'd rather let my kid work in a sweat shop.

I have a step-sister of the same age, and if I ever found out some dirty fuck was taking pictures of her in a thong and see-thru shirts, I'd beat him within an inch of his life, no matter the consequences. And I can only imagine the rage I'd feel if it was my daughter.

Some people are saying there are see-through shots of breasts and the crotch. There's a thong shot on the front page. That's got to be borderline illegal. I can't see a reason why material like that would not be illegal, but it looks like it is. That's beyond absurd.

Perhaps some research can be done to ascertain the girl's identity and report the case to Child Services (I'm not sure what the American equivalent is)? Does someone have a link?

On another note, why has this message forum not been overloaded by Goatse and ******* yet?
http://pub42.ezboard.com/fams10829frm2

ITS DOWN FOR ME right now!

:)

Fucked up shit.

Site is pretty much down for me, but main page loaded with a few graphics.


Ok, Ok, I will say it. *cough* imgsrc w/h=0 *cough* ....

the people on GFY DO have the power to cost these fucks a WHOLE boatload of money.

Before anyone says, I know, I know, probably not something most would want to get involved with. But it sure would be fun to load a few million 0-sized pics directly from their sites.

FUcked up shit.

:ak47:

That sucks:(

I don't usually go for vigilante tactics.. but in this case.....


I know there are some of you right here on the board that could take that site down so fast they wouldn't know what hit them.. dirty fighting? yeah.. but so is taking advantage of children and legal loopholes.

I can honestly say that if I had the traffic, I'd do it.