http://www.bannerbabe.com/link/idiot01.jpg

Do you really think CamChicks was trying to do anything OTHER than convince people it's not good. Please. :321GFY

*checks watch* is it time for this thread again already? Okay then, I will step in and say what I always say:

I like both. My husband is one of the few cut British guys BUT I do have a weakness for sex with uncut guys.

I really do not understand the paranoia people - particularly north Americans - have about an uncut dick. I mean, I guess I do in a way since I grew up in that culture. The first time I slept with an uncut man I was a bit scared too. I was worried that I wouldn't know what to do or how it would be different than being with a cut man. Thing is, once the first touch happened nature just took over and there were no worries at all.

There are always three issues people bring up in these threads - appearance, hygiene and sensitivity.

As far as appearance goes, no doubt someone will post a picture of a uncut cock with really long foreskin and pretend that is the way it always is with uncut men. I myself don't really go for ones with excessive foreskin but if a guy I am with has a normal amount all I can think of is how much fun it is to play with the skin. The foreskin is silky smooth to the touch and because of the natural lubrication process that comes with having it in the first place it is fun to play with it (now you see it, now you don't) and watch my partner's reaction.

Which of course leads to the sensitivity issue. Simply put - giving head to an uncut cock is out of this world if you are the type (like me) that gets off on your partner's reaction. Listening to the intake of breath from an uncut man when you touch the head for the first time is amazing and amplified tremendously from the reaction you get from a cut man in the same situation. Uncut men are way more sensitive to delicate touches. Also, as the head of their dick isn't rubbing against something most of the day they tend to be smoother on the tongue.

The whole hygiene thing is only an issue if you have someone who doesn't wash and frankly you are going to know that before you get down to sleeping with them and a cut dick in no way guarantees a clean dick. I have never slept with an uncut man that wasn't obsessive about cleaning themselves - especially if they knew there was even a slight chance of them having sex.

By the way, slavdogg, I am SICK and FUCKING TIRED of being called an idiot and ignorant by people who have no fucking clue WHO I am or WHAT I do. If you have nothing better to do than to call someone that you don't even know an idiot then maybe YOU are the idiot. For all you know I could have an IQ 30 points higher than you, so don't be ignorant.

*GOOOOOOS-FRAAA-BAAA*

Okay, I'm calm now.

Now only 60% of boys born in America get circumcised
and the number is (fortunately) decreasing.

poor kid

haha, what a bunch of pussies

i got circumcised at 9 yo. and watched the whole thing.

On what planet ??? Not earth .. LOL

You need to go check your fact checker again there einstein :)

The question is flawed anyways.

Better to whom ?

Im not , and i could really care less, it hasnt affected me one way or another so far :)

My wife says she likes it, but then again she is a little biased :) I have only ever had one girl say anything negative about it, but then again would they ?

Anyways i like all those myths :) i never knew most of that .


I think gay guys like them uncut from what i hear.

I think i saw a poll of american women that said mosy prefer cut than uncut, but then again women dont know anything more than what you tell them , so their opinion is really useless.

Question - Why do women fake orgasms ??

Answer - Who Cares.

Damn people, lets all tell each other what to wear now too.

I kinda wish I hadn't been genitally mutilated. It's true, after 19 years of rubbing against my undies my dickhead probably lost a good deal of sensitivity. No wonder girls seem to have such better orgasms than us.

And smokey, his post was a joke(i think). He means the foreskin is the other 1% of the male body :1orglaugh

yes tootie, this is a good way to convince someone its wrong

my point still stands, you're still FUCKIN ingorant

but look on the brighter side, at least i didnt call you a sick whore :) :)

<font size="8"> 50 UNCUT PENII</font>







You could be right :) after re-reading it i cant tell if its his english that was wrong or my understanding if it :)

I thought he meant men, but after reading your post i see what you mean, he could mean 99% of a man. DUH i get it.

Oh yeah, side note. I kinda have the best of both worlds. There's still a piece of the skin that connects the shaft to the head remaining on the left side of my cock. It's only about 1/4" and it's kinda weird. Doesn't really bother me. Until I started working in adult I thought they were all like that :thumbsup

I guess I could have it just snipped, but eh. It's kinda nice to be able to say "LOOK EVERYONE I'VE GOT A DIFFERENT PENIS THAN ANY OTHER DUDE" and "OH SORRY I DIDNT REALIZE IT WAS HARD, SO WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO ABOUT THAT GIRLS?" :glugglug

I'm glad to see someone else picked up on that, too. ;-}

And btw- I don't think you have any say about genital mutilation cause I've heard you don't actually own the rights to your nutsack anymore.

Oh cause Teen Kelly owns it? Or my girlfriend Holly? I think Holly owns it. No it's not you lol, her name really is Holly.

Maybe I'm really her and I'm just here spying on you to see if you're flirting with lil2rich. You can't ever tell about us Hollys. We're pretty sneaky.

Hmm..all this discussion and no one brought up the fact that 99% of the penile cases in this country are found in UN-circumcized men.

what are penile cases ??

It's what you carry your penis around in. I have two - one suede and one alligator. I'm saving up for a LV I've had my eye on.

Why anyone woukd want to go against nature? Unless something is wrong there I would leave it like it is.... would you get a girl circumcized if you are told that it is cleaner?????
Unless you have no water and soap, you are mutilating a lil person who can't decide, if he wants it done for any reason, let him decide on his penis!
Nik

yup, if I ever have a son he will be left natural unless there is a specific reason he needs it.

Maybe if people in North America weren't so freaked out by a natural penis they would teach the uncut kids better maintenance and then whatever problems there are would go down.

I'm uncut, and quite happy about it. There's no benefit to having the foreskin removed. And spare me the hygiene bullshit, if you can't take a few seconds to pull your foreskin back while you're having a shower and give it a rinse, then you don't deserve a cock.

Uncircumcised men are more sensitive and thus, experience greater pleasure. I don't really care if i cum quicker than some chopped guy. I'm potent, and i have no problem experiencing several orgasms in a session. My erections come back quickly, and i stay hard enough after an orgasm to keep going.

I feel sorry for all the mutilated lads. :winkwink:

It amazes me that people are so willing to ban something like the docking of dog's tails, but nobody seems to care about the mutilation of a new born. Scary.

that is what I am talking about :)

I'm not circumsized.

sorry but im circumcised and proud of it.

besides Male circumcision is religiously practised by the followers of Judaism and Islam.

it is estimated that about 20 per cent of males in the world are circumcised and 80 per cent of men are against it.

if it is part of your religion than that is one thing...if it isn't than it is another.

Both are great.

chopping off your foreskin is probably about as smart as taking peoples apendixes or tonsils claiming they are uneeded leftovers from evolution.

I mean what if you believe in creation?

Adam was born circumcised - but because of his sin men ever since have been born imperfect and need to be circumcised on the eight day.

LOL

I think a lot of parents in America get their male children circumcised because they think it is the norm. I am circumcised and so are my three boys. I look back on it now and wish that I had not made that decision for them.

Lately I have been doing a lot of research in this area, and any person who has read all the facts would not get their children circumsized, period. If I could turn back the clock, my boys and myself would not be cut.

I'm not cut.:321GFY

sick

I like my foreskin.

Uncut is better. It may not be pretty (is any penis pretty?) but it's natural. Any man with a forskin can choose to have it circumsized. They don't because they understand the benefit of having it and know what they would lose without it.

Holly, I don't know of anybody who was teased for not being circumsized. But even if they are, they'll soon learn that they were lucky they weren't.

Only time it should be removed is if there is a medical problem.

Truth: Circumcision was originally introduced in an attempt to stop masturbation.

It was believed that masturbation caused blindness, mental illness, alcoholism, epilepsy and a host of other ills.

http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/history.htm

What is lost from circumcision?
http://www.cirp.org/pages/parents/lostlist.html

*1. The frenar band of soft ridges--the single most pleasure producing zone on the male body. Loss of this densely innervated and reactive belt of tissue reduces the sensitivity of the remaining penis to about that of ordinary skin.

2. Approximately half of the temperature reactive smooth muscle sheath called the dartos fascia.

3. Specialized epithelial Langerhans cells, a component of the immune system.

*4. An estimated 240 feet of microscopic nerves, including branches of the dorsal nerve.

*5. Between 10,000 to 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which can discern slight motion, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture. This loss includes thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors called the Meissner's corpuscles - the most important sensory component in the foreskin.

6. Estrogen receptors the purpose and value of which are not yet fully understood.

*7. More than 50% of the mobile penile skin, the multi-purpose covering of the glans, that shields all of the specialized penile skin from abrasion, drying, and callusing (by keratin cell layering), and protects it from dirt and other contaminants. The debilitating sexual consequences of keratinizing the glans have never been studied.

8. The immunological defense system of the soft mucosa, which may produce antibacterial and antiviral proteins such as lysozyme, also found in mothers milk, and plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies.

9. Lymphatic vessels, the loss of which interrupts the lymph flow within a part of the bodys immune system.

*10. The frenulum, the very sensitive "V" shaped web-like tethering structure on the underside of the glans; usually amputated along with the foreskin, or severed, which destroys its functionality.

*11. The apocrine glands of the inner foreskin, which produce pheromones--natures powerful, silent, invisible behavioral signals to potential sexual partners. They contribute significantly to sexuality. Their loss is unstudied.

12. Ectopic sebaceous glands, which lubricate and moisturize.

*13. The essential "gliding" mechanism. If unfolded and spread out flat, the average adult foreskin measures about 15 square inches, the size of a postcard. This abundance of specialized, self-lubricating mobile skin gives the natural penis its unique hallmark ability to smoothly "glide" in and out within itself--permitting natural non-abrasive masturbation and intercourse, without drying out the vagina or requiring artificial lubricants.

14. The pink to red to dark purple natural coloration of the glans, normally an internal organ--like the tongue.

*15. A significant amount of the penis circumference because its double layered wrapping of loose foreskin is now missing making the circumcised penis defectively thinner than a full-sized intact penis.

*16. As much as one inch of the erect penis length due to amputation when the connective tissue is torn apart during "circumcision." This shared membrane tightly fuses the foreskin and the glans together while the penis develops. Ripping it apart wounds the glans, leaving it raw and subject to infection, scarring, and shrinkage.

*17. Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery. The loss of this dense vascularity interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, obviously damaging its natural function and possibly stunting its complete and healthy development.

18. Every year boys lose their penises altogether from botched "circumcisions" and infections accidents happen. They are then "sexually reassigned" by transgender surgery and must live their lives as females.

19. Every year many boys lose their lives from the complications of medically unnecessary circumcisions. The cause of these deaths are a fact the billion dollar per year circumcision industry willfully obscures and conceals.

*20. Although not yet proved scientifically, there is considerable new evidence that an incomplete penis loses its capacity for the subtle electromagnetic "cross-communication" that occurs only during contact between two mucous membranes, and which contributes to the perception of sexual ecstasy. In other words, medically unjustified foreskin amputation of boys ultimately diminishes the intensity of orgasms for both men and women!

Being informed is better than making idiotic remarks. Obviously some guys here have some issues to deal with. I would never have my future son sliced and diced because some Jock asshole who was semi-castrated at birth might decide to make fun of him.

:1orglaugh

holy crap.. an intelligent point.

too true. I would be fucking pissed as hell if I was chopped at birth. At the very, very, very least. wait till they're adults and let them decide for themselves.

Circumsized! You don't have the dickcheese issue to deal with. :1orglaugh

either do uncircumsized guys. I shower twice a day, my dick is probably cleaner than you are.

:thumbsup