Thought for sure there would be a pic of juicy on Mars!

What a croc of shit...

http://www.paulcorrigan.com/scott/bullshit.jpg

http://216.17.111.105/gfy/mars.gif

some contrast and flipping.

Question ?

Why is all ufo information classified?

Why is it aginst federal law to approach
an alien or alien spacecraft?

:Graucho

:1orglaugh

umm, astronaut? You're not very bright, are you? We have about 20 years and a trillion dollars until we put an astronaut on Mars.

Its on the official nasa website.

I don't see it neither but I see it in the 2nd picture .

I think he is right... There was life and they left behind their lava rock:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

No austraunaults landed there ... it was a fucking robot.

But seriously, honestly, WHY THE FUCK would they let the numbers there . takes 2 mins to photoshop . So that's probably only a scan of a picture where somebody wrote numbers or something . Because there is no way in hell they wouldn't have photoshoped this if it was fake.

they didnt send up astro's. They sent a huge ass machine with video to report back to nasa.......

what crockett said

Think you were missing something...focusing on the #'s too much...look at the whole pic.

http://www.spinskin.com/nasa.jpg

If you can't read it...it says GFY :321GFY

Actually, quite a few Christians believe that the Anti-Christ will show up as an "alien" to "fix" all of the Earth's problems before declaring himself to be god.

And some even believe that the fallen angels actually lived on Mars:

http://www.mt.net/~watcher/angelicconspiracy.html

http://www.mt.net/~watcher/

And that they used to live on a big planet that exploded and created the asteroid belt, too. So don't count on aliens to destroy the Christian religion. :winkwink:

haha:thumbsup

pretty cool truth...

shit, you're right, took a while to find the rock, I'd say more middle top third

the etching is too clear

but I'd really hate to think it was faked

With THIS pic I see something. But it looks like 796 to me.

Now that's cool.

I bet Coast To Coast AM will be all over this tonight.
Most likely saying it's a faked set, and this is a numbered rock that was accidentally flipped over. (All rocks in set like this would be numbered and mapped out beforehand to plan the look of "authenticity".)

It'll be neat to listen to, anyway.

What's really strange is that this picture comes out and the number is seen, and then "suddenly" we lose contact with the Mars rover.

Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmmmm

Coincidence. :Graucho

interesting. so you're saying that the US government would make the

EXACT SAME MISTAKE

that they did during the apollo landings???


go look at apollo images, there are 'numbered rocks' there as well.

and why the hell would you need the rocks numbered anyways? you'd just toss them out on the floor, who needs numbering?

Laika dog did that :Graucho

If they actually were faking something this important, you really think it would be as simple as some dude throwing rocks onto a desert floor? Really? They wouldn't be designed carefully and planned out, like they do in movies? Really? Think hard before you answer, please.

i'd concede to that, no doubt, but mostly because of the government's highly inefficient way of doing things. there's no reason to place every single 3inch rock about a landspace, i doubt movie directors do that in most cases (and it is like a big movie set).

but do you honestly think that something as widely publicised as the 'evidence' for faked moon landings - something that happened over 30 years ago - and has been so widely circulated as that, they'd make that mistake again?

doubtful. but you'd better get your tinfoil hat just in case. i'm sure you're a very firm believer in the faked apollo missions, yes?

this thread is two asprins short of a full medicine cabinet

this thread is too funny :1orglaugh

well yeah, the government is pretty retarded... especially when george bush is involved

110 aliens :)

:thumbsup

I'm not going to jump on any fake/alien bandwagon, but I wouldn't mind hearing some explanation for this. Not that I can really think of one that would make much sense, it's there clear as day on Nasa's own website. If they get rid of those images I'll put on a tinfoil hat because something's not right.

Having lost contact with rover makes one wonder doesn't it

Yes, its all because of this thread. You found out the truth!

some of you have a lot of time on your hands. or do way too many drugs...

this is stupid...

a fake 'movie set'? it's 2004 people... have you seen the computer generated landscapes in LOTR?

I think NASA would be able to find some pretty good 3d artists...

116 alliens

Bah! The answer is quite obvious we need a GFY sponsored manned expedition to the red ball in the sky to resolve this once and for all. Who's with me!?

Btw, to clarify, when I say red ball in the sky I dont mean the sun. Although Im sure there would be some suggestions for some gfy members to man that mission as well.