If you buy traffic or own paysites, this {code} can help you

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Theo
    HAL 9000
    • May 2001
    • 34515

    #1

    If you buy traffic or own paysites, this {code} can help you

    from the possibility one of the traffic affiliates or your paysite affiliates to send traffic from sites you do not want. It's a code you add to your .htaccess

    A week ago some SE affiliate sent to one of our promo pages a single click from a domain having the word underage. (didnt have any illegal stuff..thank god) The sponsor reviewed their log files and terminated our account, something that costed us couple grands....

    ok here's the code

    [PHP]
    # --------------------[ WE DO NOT WANT SUCH TRAFFIC AND WE BLOCK IT ]-----------------------

    Options +FollowSymlinks
    RewriteEngine on

    #RewriteMap offender txt:./foul.map

    #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !=""
    #RewriteCond ${offender:%{HTTP_REFERER}} ^-$
    #RewriteRule ^(.*) http://blocked/ [R,L]

    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} scat [NC,OR]
    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} illegal [NC,OR]
    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} beast [NC,OR]
    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} lolita [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*) http://blocked/ [L]

    [PHP]


    remove php tags,you add this code to your htaccess file
    for each word you want to block use the following more times:

    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} wordiwanttoblock [NC,OR]
    Last edited by Theo; 03-13-2004, 04:31 PM.
  • juicylinks
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 122992

    #2

    Comment

    • McKracken
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 703

      #3
      Did you see the memo about this?

      MAKE BIG $$$ - NEW MANINSTREAM SITE BETA LAUNCHES SEPTEMBER!
      * e-mail for more info [email protected] *

      Comment

      • Rorschach
        So Fucking Banned
        • Aug 2002
        • 5579

        #4
        There's nothing wrong with scat or beast.

        Comment

        • Project-Shadow
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2003
          • 7340

          #5
          Not saying that any of the above things are correct or right etc. But wouldnt it be more appropriate to say redirect the surfer to your site removing any current refferal info? E.G sending them to www.yoursite.com/index2.html framing the main site?

          Comment

          • Theo
            HAL 9000
            • May 2001
            • 34515

            #6
            well the point is not to receive any traffic related with the above, not to just avoid your sponsor seen the refferal, that could have been done as you said with a simple redirection. The chances to receive such kind of traffic are minimal....but its better to eliminate it.

            Comment

            • BradM
              Confirmed User
              • Dec 2003
              • 3397

              #7
              Good job S_R.
              Thanks

              Comment

              • Doctor Dre
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jan 2001
                • 51692

                #8
                Originally posted by McKracken
                Did you see the memo about this?
                What's up with your memo things and threads ?
                Originally posted by rayadp05
                I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                Comment

                • Doctor Dre
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 51692

                  #9
                  Who's the sponsor ? If they'd terminate my account for something I didn't do, I'd fucking expose them and make them shit in their pants.
                  Originally posted by rayadp05
                  I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                  Comment

                  • SABAI
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 2880

                    #10
                    for once some useful info ,,, thanks a bunch

                    Comment

                    • some_idiot
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2002
                      • 1511

                      #11
                      Hmmm seems funny...

                      Surfer SEs, hits affiliate, picks up aff ref, hits you, doesn't pick
                      up your ref, hits sponsor, sponsor sees aff ref.

                      Something was broken large in the http chain on that one.
                      The sponsor should have never gotten the aff ref. Seems to
                      me that a browser that broken, it wouldn't help to force even
                      the extra landing page.

                      This AVS pays my mortgage!

                      Comment

                      Working...