I am real sorry to hear about the stroke Jimmyf. A complete recovery...or did you forget how to "play the piano"?

The crux of the issue is whether or not Clinton was planning to take the SAME type of action against Iraq that Bush took.

From the current news story on CNN's website:

"Bush administration officials have noted that U.S. policy dating from the Clinton administration was to seek "regime change" in Iraq, although it focused on funding and training Iraqi opposition groups rather than using military force."

So there was no plan for pre-emptive strikes or direct military intervention by the United States under Clinton.

Chock up another well thought out political analysis by sperm breath.

I would say a complete recovery. I get a little confused when I work on some electronic's stuff. I have 2 stop and really think, have 2 think thru some trouble shooting that came auto.

Of course there was...as there is for many...if not most countries in the world...the military planners would be negligent in their duty if there were not. These plans are shelved and then taken out occasionally...dusted off...for possible modification.

Well...hang in there TROOPER...and follow the Doc's advice.

Ouch. Did I make you angry?? Just realized that Clark was running for Pres huh?? Don't worry, you can message me anytime if you need help interpreting daily events. I charge only $10 per question.

I'd just tell' em 2 go back to school, Get Diff. teachers this time, try 2 explane something 2 them and they say you lie well not right out say LIE, but thats what they think. Beyond there thinking that we would have plans 2 invade even England.:1orglaugh

Well...different solutions come with different administrations...it has been that way since the first administration and will continue to be that way for future administrations. Apparently President Clinton had his strategy for the policy of "regime change" adopted during his term and apparently President Bush had a strategy for President Clinton's "policy of regime change"...and this is of course assuming...for the time being...that the Secretary of Defense is correct in the statement he made today.

Don't flatter yourself Rush boy. My emotions are not dictated by sheep that calls themselves 'BigFish' :1orglaugh

perhaps you should lookup what unilateral means before you shout it out :thumbsup

u·ni·lat·er·al ( P ) Pronunciation Key (yn-ltr-l)
adj.
Of, on, relating to, involving, or affecting only one side: ?a unilateral advantage in defense? (New Republic).
Performed or undertaken by only one side: unilateral disarmament.
Obligating only one of two or more parties, nations, or persons, as a contract or an agreement.
Emphasizing or recognizing only one side of a subject.
Having only one side.
Tracing the lineage of one parent only: a unilateral genealogy.
Botany. Having leaves, flowers, or other parts on one side only.

I used the word appropriately...care to retract? :thumbsup

I just want everyone to notice that.... theking and sexeducation... are the only ones who post here.... and put little dots.... after every other.... word...

theking is a pedo!

:BangBang:

Yes your right I am a idiot lol. Still havent gotten use to working days instead of nights brain a little foggy.

so "regime change" means the same thing as "pre-emptive attack and occupation"?

you far-righters have that flag wrapped just a little too-tightly for sufficient blood-circulation to the cranium, methinks.

Well...it is apparent that is one strategy for "regime change".