Damn, FreeBSD is real fast! - GoFuckYourself.com

aleck · 01-10-2004, 09:40 PM

shvizt, i should change OS ages ago.

one FreeBSD 4.9 box with 0.06 load is taking traffic that two RH9 Linux boxes were serving with ~2.0 load.

that's really a BIG difference ;-)

elric · 01-10-2004, 09:43 PM

What kind of traffic?

Static HTML and images?

Scripts?

alias · 01-10-2004, 09:43 PM

I have never tried linux but this is just more evidence to support my theory that it sucks compared to fbsd which is the sh1t

MadCap · 01-10-2004, 09:43 PM

I use nothing but for my hosting clients and all my servers. FreeBSD is the shit man no dought.

MadCap · 01-10-2004, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by elric
What kind of traffic?

Static HTML and images?

Scripts?

'

Everything man linux and the rest of them are shit compared to BSD

aleck · 01-10-2004, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by elric
What kind of traffic?

Static HTML and images?

Scripts?

all static. the same traffic as two boxes combined. it's just serving each request faster - less processes total.

DennisS · 01-10-2004, 09:51 PM

if you want even more performance out of your freebsd box apply following:

vi /etc/sysctl.conf

kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608
kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192
kern.ipc.maxsockets=16424
kern.maxfiles=65536
kern.maxfilesperproc=32768
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=1048576
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=1048576
net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535
net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344
net.local.stream.recvspace=65535
net.local.stream.sendspace=65535

------------------------------------------------
vi /boot/loader.conf

kern.ipc.maxsockets="50000"
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="25000"
kern.ipc.mbufs="50000"

THEN save and reboot enjoy

aleck · 01-10-2004, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by alias
I have never tried linux but this is just more evidence to support my theory that it sucks compared to fbsd which is the sh1t

yep, it's the real shit. 3 years ago when i was just starting adult i used to have a virtual account with freebsd on it - was impressed even that time. now, i'm simply moving to freebsd all boxes. no fucking need for dual xeon if you have freebsd

the devil has assraped the pengiun again

Arty · 01-10-2004, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by aleck
shvizt, i should change OS ages ago.

one FreeBSD 4.9 box with 0.06 load is taking traffic that two RH9 Linux boxes were serving with ~2.0 load.

that's really a BIG difference ;-)

Welcome!

aleck · 01-10-2004, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DennisS
if you want even more performance out of your freebsd box apply following:

vi /etc/sysctl.conf

kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608
kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192
kern.ipc.maxsockets=16424
kern.maxfiles=65536
kern.maxfilesperproc=32768
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=1048576
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=1048576
net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535
net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344
net.local.stream.recvspace=65535
net.local.stream.sendspace=65535

------------------------------------------------
vi /boot/loader.conf

kern.ipc.maxsockets="50000"
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="25000"
kern.ipc.mbufs="50000"

THEN save and reboot enjoy

tnx man, but with such low load i can't complain. seems that the box can saturate 100Mbps line now, while Linux one was gagging on 8Mbps.

MadCap · 01-10-2004, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by aleck

yep, it's the real shit. 3 years ago when i was just starting adult i used to have a virtual account with freebsd on it - was impressed even that time. now, i'm simply moving to freebsd all boxes. no fucking need for dual xeon if you have freebsd

the devil has assraped the pengiun again

Exactly thats why i posted the pic.

aleck · 01-10-2004, 09:56 PM

sure. and the devil is doing it again & again.

especially when Red Hat is pulling out support for most popular RH7-9...

Brujah · 01-10-2004, 10:02 PM

What's the learning curve like, switching from Red Hat to FreeBSD ?

MadCap · 01-10-2004, 10:03 PM

Not much man I if you know redhat and have a few hours man youre in there

Rorschach · 01-10-2004, 10:05 PM

FreeBSD does indeed have a kick ass kernel for high loads.

I've always found it a bit buggy on the desktop though, and prefer Slackware for that... plus the new 2.6 Linux kernel is pretty wicked.

aleck · 01-10-2004, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadCap
Not much man I if you know redhat and have a few hours man youre in there

indeed.
it took me 4 hrs to setup EVERYTHING on freebsd box from a scratch. from compiling apache/php/mysql/perl to transfering 4 gigs from linux boxes

Mr Pheer · 01-10-2004, 10:34 PM

FreeBSD is the only OS I will use on my machines running my SE spamware, other OS's choke on the load that the spider make running thru my scripts

01-10-2004, 09:40 PM	#1
aleck Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 940	Damn, FreeBSD is real fast! shvizt, i should change OS ages ago. one FreeBSD 4.9 box with 0.06 load is taking traffic that two RH9 Linux boxes were serving with ~2.0 load. that's really a BIG difference ;-) __________________ come trade shemale traffic here

01-10-2004, 09:43 PM	#3
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	I have never tried linux but this is just more evidence to support my theory that it sucks compared to fbsd which is the sh1t __________________ https://porncorporation.com

01-10-2004, 09:51 PM	#7
DennisS Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: N.Y.C Posts: 265	if you want even more performance out of your freebsd box apply following: vi /etc/sysctl.conf kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608 kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 kern.ipc.maxsockets=16424 kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=1048576 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=1048576 net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535 net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 net.local.stream.recvspace=65535 net.local.stream.sendspace=65535 ------------------------------------------------ vi /boot/loader.conf kern.ipc.maxsockets="50000" kern.ipc.nmbclusters="25000" kern.ipc.mbufs="50000" THEN save and reboot enjoy __________________

01-10-2004, 09:56 PM	#12
aleck Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 940	sure. and the devil is doing it again & again. especially when Red Hat is pulling out support for most popular RH7-9... __________________ come trade shemale traffic here

01-10-2004, 10:02 PM	#13
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	What's the learning curve like, switching from Red Hat to FreeBSD ? __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

01-10-2004, 09:43 PM	#2
elric Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 296	What kind of traffic? Static HTML and images? Scripts?

01-10-2004, 09:43 PM	#4
MadCap Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: 137771650 Minneapolis MN Posts: 2,357	I use nothing but for my hosting clients and all my servers. FreeBSD is the shit man no dought.

01-10-2004, 10:03 PM	#14
MadCap Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: 137771650 Minneapolis MN Posts: 2,357	Not much man I if you know redhat and have a few hours man youre in there

01-10-2004, 10:05 PM	#15
Rorschach So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,579	FreeBSD does indeed have a kick ass kernel for high loads. I've always found it a bit buggy on the desktop though, and prefer Slackware for that... plus the new 2.6 Linux kernel is pretty wicked.

01-10-2004, 10:34 PM	#17
Mr Pheer Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 21,257	FreeBSD is the only OS I will use on my machines running my SE spamware, other OS's choke on the load that the spider make running thru my scripts __________________ 2 lifeguards for Jessica