Morgan

I know, enough CCBill threads already. But im getting mixed sides from people and I think showing affiliates this detail is a good thing.

Will you be more likely to use CCBill sites in the future or Less likely?

__________________
PornstarPlatinum.com | TransErotica.com

JSA Matt

Depends on what ccbill has to say about this.. I havn't heard anything yet...

RockDaddy

That's kind of what I'm thinking. If they come out and say "Our stats are tight, those are your cheating sponsors", I definately will.

If they come out and say it was their error, even though I like the new admin and features, that is a pretty serious error and would call their abilities into question a little. So, I'm not sure. I would probably use them about the same as now but probably not more and I would watch my stats a lot closer.

Sausage

unfair poll

Most kids here are newbies/affiliates and dont run a program, so they will all go the same way.

Do you think that most affiliate software has a shave option because people didn't want it ;)

Morgan

Maybe CCBill should just kill the ability for program owners to be able to choose how long rebills should last. So no matter what, all sites would rebill indefinately.

Would we see many programs change to other processors? If so, thats sad, very sad.

__________________
PornstarPlatinum.com | TransErotica.com

Infanz

Why do you think so many of the big boys use paycom? they are scamming shaving sacks of shit! And in the days of less than 1 percent cb, with their common 2 pre-checked upsale boxes, I would be the farm that within 4-5 years Paycom will certainly not be in biz like it is anymore. if anyone will last its CCBILL. Been using them for 5 years and I would not trust another processor, not even ibill. CCBILL has a total of less than 1 percent CB from all the sites the process for. thats fucking amazing considering the volume they do.

__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

smproduction

Sure I will continue to use ccbill, and the new features improved their services so I really dont see good reasons to leave them

__________________
<a href="http://www.wishing.com/money/"><img src="http://www.wishing.com/money/promotools/referrals/bannerset2/wishing_affiliate_120x60_06.gif" border="0"><br><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2"><b>Wishing.com</b>- Make over <b>$100.00</b> per sale with pills and patches</font></a>

QualityMpegs

i really think more people need to use epoch or jettis

__________________

PAYSITES CATEGORIZED AND THUMBNAILED BY NICHE - 69767780

HarlotCash Dyker

Totally disagree - ccbill put it there for a reason - So sponsors could be creative with their marketing - Unfortunately, a thieving few scumbags took creativity the wrong way.
If a programme decided to offer ) per trial and 90% for three months maximum - This would be quite a good selling point - Anything after 3 months is 100% the sponsor -

Or - If a sponsor decided to pay 10bucks per join and X% for X months - Again, this is a good selling point - This is what ccbill intended -

I certainly do not think this feature was implimented so ccbill could help their webmasters shave -

Everything is now so fucking crystal clear for webmasters to promote ccbill sites that there is absolutely no reason to mistrust the programme you are sending your traffic to.

Of course - There are other choices - Where things are not quite so transparent -

It's your traffic, it's yours to do what you want with it

Edited to correct a drunkard's stupid spelling mistakes - Sorrry

__________________
!!!Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash!!!

Ross

What he said.