As long as its still small you are probably safe . Just dont get it big ... but then its just a wrong idea to do that you should get another safer domain name
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Originally posted by Doctor Dre As long as its still small you are probably safe . Just dont get it big ... but then its just a wrong idea to do that you should get another safer domain name
yea Daffy duck is a toon,,, Daffy Dick isnt,, that what im currious about
Yes, they could sue you. You'll have to get their attention first though, and if they'll win is pretty much anybody's guess. If you have any other reason for using the name than their trademark, it would help.
I don't think there is any thing infringing on it! If you don't have a duck as a logo or any thing that ties it to Daffy Duck, they wouldn't really have anything to go against you with!
jDoG
NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD
PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash
NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES
CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)
Originally posted by Abyss_Vee For running a site on DaffyDick.com ?
hope not ..
Parody is an exemption to copyright laws. The most recent big test of this that went all the way to the US Supreme Court was when Luke Skyywalker of the 2 Live Crew made a version of "Pretty Woman." He won because his song "Pretty Hairy Woman" was a parody.
Best thing is to get a new domain name as Disney is a big company and has the money for a lawsuit. If they do sue you and lose, you can lose a good 10,000 in lawyer fees. You don't have the advantages of negotiation like you do when dealing with smaller companies suing you.
Originally posted by JDog I don't think there is any thing infringing on it! If you don't have a duck as a logo or any thing that ties it to Daffy Duck, they wouldn't really have anything to go against you with!
jDoG
Yea,, i was thinkin as long as i dont link it to their disney character... i should be safe... god knows there are other Daffy's in this world with dicks ? no ?
more likely what they'd do is take you to WIPO and win the domain through their arbitration process. Unless you are well prepared they would most likely win.
Originally posted by raulph Best thing is to get a new domain name as Disney is a big company and has the money for a lawsuit. If they do sue you and lose, you can lose a good 10,000 in lawyer fees. You don't have the advantages of negotiation like you do when dealing with smaller companies suing you.
So whats the line between parody and tarnishing someone's image. Not to mention that a sing that aims for a parody is one thing, but a site, listing porn, say he used a duck mascot, isnt really a parody of the character, and sounds more like something along the lines of using the characters fame to profit.
Originally posted by sacX yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.
It's a bad idea and most likely illegal to run an adult site on that domain name.
Query Zuccarini prison into google if you don't believe me
Zuccarini reportedly admitted to 49 counts of using domain names to direct minors to nudity or sexually explicit content. Each count is punishable by up to four years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Watch out... famous domain typo squatter John Zuccharini is now going to prison for misleading kids to porn sites. Apparently he owned typos of cartoons that lead to porn. The new law was bundled with the Amber Alert Bill. Pretty heavy penalties.
Originally posted by sacX yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.
It's a bad idea and most likely illegal to run an adult site on that domain name.
Query Zuccarini prison into google if you don't believe me
No matter how you look at it, it was regged based on Daffy Duck, there is no way you would be able to win in WIPO, no way in hell. I would certainly sue your ass so expect them to do the same.
Even if you decided to keep it and not have a Duck in your logo wouldnt make the tie in which is what you where going for wasnt it, a play on the characters name?
Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning
Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.
Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.
He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.
Originally posted by icedemon Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning
Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.
Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.
He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.
Go register something like playvoy.com and come back and let us know how much it would cost you to prove your point..
Originally posted by icedemon Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning
Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.
Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.
He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.
Im affraid you are very wrong on this one ice.......
They'll start out by sending you a cease and desist. Then they'll take it to court, whether it's parody or not. Eventually, either you'll win in court or run out of money. It won't come cheap though.
Originally posted by Rictor They'll start out by sending you a cease and desist. Then they'll take it to court, whether it's parody or not. Eventually, either you'll win in court or run out of money. It won't come cheap though.
Someone just fell off the turnip truck. The US has a law about misleading domains and they have been very successful in prosectuting people. I doubt WB will do much more than send a C&D but getting prosecuted by the attorney general's office isn't something I would want to take on.
Comment