USC should tell the BCS to Go Fuck Themselves! - GoFuckYourself.com

TheEnforcer · 12-07-2003, 08:01 PM

What a crock. #1 in both polls and they gotta be out of the "national title" game. Oklahoma doesn't deserve to be in the title game after the thumping they took. The BCS is pure BS!

triumph · 12-07-2003, 08:03 PM

Thats exactly what coach Pete said today, he said they will be hosting the national championship game at the rose bowl.

triumph · 12-07-2003, 08:03 PM

oh, btw all the OU and LSU fans that respond below can suck it all night long.

ChumpChange · 12-07-2003, 08:05 PM

it's because o.j. use to play for them and they don't wnat him showing up for the title game

TheEnforcer · 12-07-2003, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChumpChange
it's because o.j. use to play for them and they don't wnat him showing up for the title game

hahaha!!

Ok that was quite funny!!

Lonny · 12-07-2003, 08:11 PM

I agree fuck BCS, oklahoma may deserve some credits for having a good season, However does not belong in a title game because it is not the best team in its conference.

Quote:

Originally posted by TheEnforcer
What a crock. #1 in both polls and they gotta be out of the "national title" game. Oklahoma doesn't deserve to be in the title game after the thumping they took. The BCS is pure BS!

nap · 12-07-2003, 08:15 PM

how long are you going to piss and moan about this? maybe you should blame your team for losing to CAL. had your team had not lost you wouldn't be bitching now.

nap · 12-07-2003, 08:16 PM

odds are your team WONT beat the Wolverines

ChumpChange · 12-07-2003, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheEnforcer

hahaha!!

Ok that was quite funny!!

i'm serious..he's an ex-player right, all almuni's will be there and to see o.j. @ the 2nd biggest football game of the year will be kinda og awkward

TheEnforcer · 12-07-2003, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nap
how long are you going to piss and moan about this? maybe you should blame your team for losing to CAL. had your team had not lost you wouldn't be bitching now.

I'm NOT a USC fan at all. I'm from the Midwest and couldn't give a shit about any of the three teams involved other than I want the two teams who deserve to be playing in the "national title" bowl game to actually be playing in that game. And Oklahoma is not one of those two teams.

beergood · 12-07-2003, 08:54 PM

Sugar or Rose bowl. USC is still getting murdered. Michigan will bury their asses

GonePhishing · 12-07-2003, 09:03 PM

USC in the Rose Bowl against Michigan does make for a classic match up. It was hard to really feel know which 2 out of the three teams should face each other though.

I thought LSU, USC, and OU were impressive all year long. Though, I would say the AP does get to declare a national championship as well. Being that the Trojans are number 1 in both human polls, they still have a chance for a split national title. Okay, I know it's not what USC fans wanted... However, it is something to play for.

As a Michigan fan I am happy to see the Rose Bowl with a traditional big ten and pac ten match up. Take heart USC fans, there's still a chance... You'll have to beat the Wolverines though, and that ain't going to be a piece of cake.

M GO BLUE!

nap · 12-07-2003, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheEnforcer

I'm NOT a USC fan at all. I'm from the Midwest and couldn't give a shit about any of the three teams involved other than I want the two teams who deserve to be playing in the "national title" bowl game to actually be playing in that game. And Oklahoma is not one of those two teams.

apparently they are

Meni69 · 12-07-2003, 09:16 PM

LICK ME

With all due respect to #3 USC, the teams most deserving of invitations to the Sugar Bowl are #1 Oklahoma and #2 LSU
All 3 teams have 1 loss, and USC simply has not beaten anywhere near the caliber of teams that Oklahoma and LSU have beaten:
Based on teams' current rankings, Oklahoma and LSU have each played 2 games vs. better teams than USC's toughest opponent, and they have each played 5 games vs. better teams than USC's 2nd-toughest opponent
USC has not played a current top-15 team, and the Trojans are only 2-1 vs. the current top-40, despite playing #38 and #40
The best team USC has beaten is #18 Washington St., while Oklahoma has beaten #5 Texas, and LSU has beaten #12 Georgia twice
The 2nd-best team USC has played is #38 Cal, which beat the Trojans
Oklahoma and LSU have each lost only to a current top-25 team (#16 Kansas St. and #24 Florida, respectively), and they have combined for 9 wins over teams currently ranked higher than Cal
As the following list shows, USC has posted only 2 of the 10 best wins by these 3 teams (based on teams' current rankings): 1. Oklahoma over #5 Texas, 2. (tie) LSU over #12 Georgia (regular season), 2. (tie) LSU over #12 Georgia (SEC championship game), 4. USC over #18 Washington St., 5. Oklahoma over #19 Oklahoma St., 6. LSU over #20 Arkansas, 7. LSU over #23 Mississippi, 8. Oklahoma over #31 Texas Tech, 9. Oklahoma over #32 Missouri, 10. (tie) USC over #40 Auburn, 10. (tie) LSU over #40 Auburn
In sum, the Trojans' top wins are over much worse teams than the Sooners and Tigers have beaten, and the Trojans' loss is to a much worse team too: Oklahoma and LSU deserve to play in the Sugar Bowl

huey · 12-07-2003, 11:45 PM

Can you say strength of schedule. Pac 10 was fuckin weak this year. Are you telling me Cal is better than K state.

12-07-2003, 09:16 PM	#14
Meni69 Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Manchester, NH Posts: 440	LICK ME With all due respect to #3 USC, the teams most deserving of invitations to the Sugar Bowl are #1 Oklahoma and #2 LSU All 3 teams have 1 loss, and USC simply has not beaten anywhere near the caliber of teams that Oklahoma and LSU have beaten: Based on teams' current rankings, Oklahoma and LSU have each played 2 games vs. better teams than USC's toughest opponent, and they have each played 5 games vs. better teams than USC's 2nd-toughest opponent USC has not played a current top-15 team, and the Trojans are only 2-1 vs. the current top-40, despite playing #38 and #40 The best team USC has beaten is #18 Washington St., while Oklahoma has beaten #5 Texas, and LSU has beaten #12 Georgia twice The 2nd-best team USC has played is #38 Cal, which beat the Trojans Oklahoma and LSU have each lost only to a current top-25 team (#16 Kansas St. and #24 Florida, respectively), and they have combined for 9 wins over teams currently ranked higher than Cal As the following list shows, USC has posted only 2 of the 10 best wins by these 3 teams (based on teams' current rankings): 1. Oklahoma over #5 Texas, 2. (tie) LSU over #12 Georgia (regular season), 2. (tie) LSU over #12 Georgia (SEC championship game), 4. USC over #18 Washington St., 5. Oklahoma over #19 Oklahoma St., 6. LSU over #20 Arkansas, 7. LSU over #23 Mississippi, 8. Oklahoma over #31 Texas Tech, 9. Oklahoma over #32 Missouri, 10. (tie) USC over #40 Auburn, 10. (tie) LSU over #40 Auburn In sum, the Trojans' top wins are over much worse teams than the Sooners and Tigers have beaten, and the Trojans' loss is to a much worse team too: Oklahoma and LSU deserve to play in the Sugar Bowl __________________ Earn $40/Free Join with Cream Bling.. Exclusive content, tube clips

12-07-2003, 11:45 PM	#15
huey Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: vancouver Posts: 3,798	Can you say strength of schedule. Pac 10 was fuckin weak this year. Are you telling me Cal is better than K state. __________________ opinions are like assholes................. "They aren't after me, they are AFTER YOU! Im just in their way" -D.J. Trump

12-07-2003, 08:01 PM	#1
TheEnforcer Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 2,855	USC should tell the BCS to Go Fuck Themselves! What a crock. #1 in both polls and they gotta be out of the "national title" game. Oklahoma doesn't deserve to be in the title game after the thumping they took. The BCS is pure BS! __________________ Hit me up below for all your advertising needs!

12-07-2003, 08:03 PM	#2
triumph Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,433	Thats exactly what coach Pete said today, he said they will be hosting the national championship game at the rose bowl.

12-07-2003, 08:05 PM	#4
ChumpChange Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 329	it's because o.j. use to play for them and they don't wnat him showing up for the title game __________________ ticking

12-07-2003, 08:15 PM	#7
nap Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: midwest Posts: 2,765	how long are you going to piss and moan about this? maybe you should blame your team for losing to CAL. had your team had not lost you wouldn't be bitching now.

12-07-2003, 08:16 PM	#8
nap Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: midwest Posts: 2,765	odds are your team WONT beat the Wolverines

12-07-2003, 08:54 PM	#11
beergood Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: United States Posts: 2,918	Sugar or Rose bowl. USC is still getting murdered. Michigan will bury their asses

12-07-2003, 09:03 PM	#12
GonePhishing Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Blah Posts: 2,474	USC in the Rose Bowl against Michigan does make for a classic match up. It was hard to really feel know which 2 out of the three teams should face each other though. I thought LSU, USC, and OU were impressive all year long. Though, I would say the AP does get to declare a national championship as well. Being that the Trojans are number 1 in both human polls, they still have a chance for a split national title. Okay, I know it's not what USC fans wanted... However, it is something to play for. As a Michigan fan I am happy to see the Rose Bowl with a traditional big ten and pac ten match up. Take heart USC fans, there's still a chance... You'll have to beat the Wolverines though, and that ain't going to be a piece of cake. M GO BLUE! __________________ If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...