Media Blackout on HUGE Lawsuit against all members of Bush Admin! - GoFuckYourself.com

Massivecock · 12-05-2003, 04:34 AM

http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html

Click link to see the lawsuit claims filed in supreme court.

Read the background below!

BIG THINGS ARE HAPPENING!!

Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state of US journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again.

Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on Terrorism" for personal and political gain.

She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat.

The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashhahahahaha and Tenet":

1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or attempt to prevent it;

2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;

3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and

4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death.

The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony [that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead to??| an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and politically."

Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).

Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference to which nobody came.

(Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX News appears, tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.)

Now imagine the air time, column inches and talk show hysteria that same night devoted to the legal hassles of Michael, Kobe, and Scott Peterson, and divide that by the attention paid to our little case of mass murder, war profiteering and treason. (OK, this is really a trick question because no number divided by zero yields any answers whatsoever, which evidently in this case is the result preferred.)

When you present documented charges of official treachery behind the greatest national security disaster in modern history and the press doesn't show, doesn't listen, doesn't write - just what in fact is really being communicated? That despite all the deaths, lies, wars, and bizarre official actions that flowed from 9/11 there's actually nothing there to be investigated at all? That addressing desperate victim families' still unanswered cries for truth is not a legitimate journalistic concern? That news will now be what the corporate media say it will be, so drink your infotainment Kool-Aid and kindly shut up?

(While the 9/11 blackout is the most flagrant sign of current media dysfunction, it hardly stands alone. Where, for example, was our free and fearless press when Pentagon powerbroker Richard Perle confessed to a London audience last month that yes indeed, our war on Iraq was illegal as hell? He calmly explained that "in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing??| [it] would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone, and this would have been morally unacceptable."

(Guardian/UK, 11/20/03) And what news have we seen of the thousands of Depleted Uranium deaths and birth defects now desolating Afghanis, Iraqis and our own Gulf War troops? And whose looking into the $1.2 trillion the Pentagon admits is "missing" or the half trillion in laundered funds now propping up our banks? And how many times have you seen it reported that unbid Iraq contracts have pushed the worth of VP Cheney's 433,333 Halliburton stock options to $26 million plus? But to return to 9/11, the funny business has just begun. If you thought press performance after JFK's death was a cynical farce, you ain't seen nothing yet.)

A few years back Harold Evans of the London Sunday Times, observed that the challenge facing American newspapers "is not to stay in business -- it is to stay in journalism.'' As corporations' authoritarian, profit-driven consciousness comes to dominate both media and governance, you can expect a lot more serial celebrity scandals and even less news on the way things work or anything that really counts.

There is a clear method and message in this obscurantist madness. All this media consolidation and tightening control is strategically aligned with deregulation, privatization, social program-gutting deficits and free trade regimes. They are all convergent tactics to enforce corporations' full spectrum dominance over democratic humankind. If your progressive or conservative instincts bid you to arise against this coup, standing with our 9/11 widow is a good place to start. Her name is Ellen Mariani, her lawyer is Phillip Berg and their complaint is now online at http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html

liquidmoe · 12-05-2003, 04:41 AM

Everyone should be aware that journalism in America for a while now has been about business and not attempting to find out the truth or present the state of world affairs in an objective manner to the people.

But it is a bit shocking that despite knowing all of that, something as news worthy as this was completely shunned. I mean regardless of the amount of profiteering that is at the center of journalism you still think that if true news occurs they simply have to report it, well I guess that was a false hope.

Why · 12-05-2003, 05:02 AM

id mail that to a few million americans, but i fear i would be imprisoned. seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

BlueFly · 12-05-2003, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Why
id mail that to a few million americans, but i fear i would be imprisoned. seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

Which part of the patriot act does this? Have you read it? I have.

chemicaleyes · 12-05-2003, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Why
id mail that to a few million americans, but i fear i would be imprisoned. seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

that's good, so now your not aloud a public opinion on your government, free speech bs..

Rich · 12-05-2003, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
Which part of the patriot act does this? Have you read it? I have.

No, no you haven't. I don't like to call people liars, but no, you have not read the Patriot act, you're lying about that. Having Rush break it down for you on talk radio doesn't count. What Why said is absolutely true, the Unpatriotic act can be used against any organization opposing Bush.

liquidmoe · 12-05-2003, 11:55 AM

Finally a proper thread gets a bump. Bottom line is people have been held in jail once again in recent years without being charged with crimes formally or having their case presented before a judge, not exactly the road of freedom and free speech.

Rich · 12-05-2003, 12:09 PM

Do you guys think the mainstream media will ever pick this story up? MAYBE when he gets found guilty. Maybe.

I'm going to call CBC, I'm sure they'll run it if there's anything to this lawsuit.

Big Monkie · 12-05-2003, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Why
seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

Oh cmon, you know that isnt true! Its patriotic to speak out against the govt as long as you are talking about the govt CLINTON was running.

ytcracker · 12-05-2003, 12:13 PM

if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution

which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time

liquidmoe · 12-05-2003, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ytcracker
if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution

which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time

I remember a time you only needed a pitch fork and some fire-water to start a revolution.

digi · 12-05-2003, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
They dont come here... terrorists are not welcome here anymore

FriscoBecky · 12-05-2003, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ytcracker
if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution

which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time

After the revolution, all white ******s will be round up and shot.

ytcracker · 12-05-2003, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FriscoBecky

After the revolution, all white ******s will be round up and shot.

nice mouth

BlueFly · 12-05-2003, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich

No, no you haven't. I don't like to call people liars, but no, you have not read the Patriot act, you're lying about that. Having Rush break it down for you on talk radio doesn't count. What Why said is absolutely true, the Unpatriotic act can be used against any organization opposing Bush.

Read it for yourself here. Pretty fucking boring shit, but it really isn't as bad as some people make it out to be. Dianne Feinstein teamed up with the ACLU to shoot down this act. She did an her own investigation but when the ACLU could not provide her with a single case where rights have actually been violated, she changed her mind and spoke out in favor of the bill.

sperbonzo · 12-05-2003, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
Read it for yourself here. Pretty fucking boring shit, but it really isn't as bad as some people make it out to be. Dianne Feinstein teamed up with the ACLU to shoot down this act. She did an her own investigation but when the ACLU could not provide her with a single case where rights have actually been violated, she changed her mind and spoke out in favor of the bill.

Thanks Bluefly, you beat me to the punch...

BTW, I actually heard reports about thsi lawsuit on both the Rush Limbaugh program AND Fox news channel.......the irony is just over the top, don't ya' think?

jas1552 · 12-05-2003, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Why
id mail that to a few million americans, but i fear i would be imprisoned. seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

Yeah you better watch out man or you'll end up in one of those republican reeducation camps. I've seen people on this board time and time again say things like 'there's no political dissent allowed in this country anymore. If you speak out the Bush government will get you'. What a big fucking load of bullshit. Liberals complain about the Bush administration all day on national tv, radio, and print and aren't imprisoned or punished for it in any way. Why aren't they rounding up all the people that make all the anti-bush and anti-america websites? People talk shit about Bush on GFY constantly. Who here has been punished for it? Fucking drama queens.

You seem to be taking this seriously so I'm assuming you've never read Massivecocks nutty conspiracy filled posts before.

EscortBiz · 12-05-2003, 01:30 PM

some people just never get it

BlueFly · 12-05-2003, 01:35 PM

why is the word ASHCR0FT censored here?

jas1552 · 12-05-2003, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
why is the word ASHCR0FT censored here?

Because if someone were to say something bad about him using the real spelling his banned speech internet spider would alert him to the trouble makers on GFY and within 5 minutes big black suvs would pull up to the "troublemakers" houses and agents of a secret govenment agency that has no name would drag them away to guantanamo bay never to be heard from again. So yeah it's a way to obstruct justice.

Centurion · 12-05-2003, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ytcracker
if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution

which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time

What year did you start losing your sanity?
Wtf does guns have to do about the freedom of the press?
Talk about a whining conservative!

BlueFly · 12-05-2003, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ytcracker
if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution

which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time

Hey, ytcracker, do have a higher resolution copy of this picture?

hottoddy · 12-05-2003, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Massivecock
Media Blackout on HUGE Lawsuit against all members of Bush Admin!

Where's the part about a "Media Blackout?" The initial complaint was filed just last week. Lots of crackpot lawsuits are filed against gov't administrations. Most are simply attempts at gaining publicity, and 99% will eventually be dismissed outright. Where's your story then?

12-05-2003, 04:34 AM	#1
Massivecock Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 800	Media Blackout on HUGE Lawsuit against all members of Bush Admin! http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html Click link to see the lawsuit claims filed in supreme court. Read the background below! BIG THINGS ARE HAPPENING!! Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state of US journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again. Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on Terrorism" for personal and political gain. She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat. The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashhahahahaha and Tenet": 1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or attempt to prevent it; 2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day; 3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and 4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death. The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony [that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead to??\| an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and politically." Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission). Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference to which nobody came. (Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX News appears, tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.) Now imagine the air time, column inches and talk show hysteria that same night devoted to the legal hassles of Michael, Kobe, and Scott Peterson, and divide that by the attention paid to our little case of mass murder, war profiteering and treason. (OK, this is really a trick question because no number divided by zero yields any answers whatsoever, which evidently in this case is the result preferred.) When you present documented charges of official treachery behind the greatest national security disaster in modern history and the press doesn't show, doesn't listen, doesn't write - just what in fact is really being communicated? That despite all the deaths, lies, wars, and bizarre official actions that flowed from 9/11 there's actually nothing there to be investigated at all? That addressing desperate victim families' still unanswered cries for truth is not a legitimate journalistic concern? That news will now be what the corporate media say it will be, so drink your infotainment Kool-Aid and kindly shut up? (While the 9/11 blackout is the most flagrant sign of current media dysfunction, it hardly stands alone. Where, for example, was our free and fearless press when Pentagon powerbroker Richard Perle confessed to a London audience last month that yes indeed, our war on Iraq was illegal as hell? He calmly explained that "in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing??\| [it] would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone, and this would have been morally unacceptable." (Guardian/UK, 11/20/03) And what news have we seen of the thousands of Depleted Uranium deaths and birth defects now desolating Afghanis, Iraqis and our own Gulf War troops? And whose looking into the $1.2 trillion the Pentagon admits is "missing" or the half trillion in laundered funds now propping up our banks? And how many times have you seen it reported that unbid Iraq contracts have pushed the worth of VP Cheney's 433,333 Halliburton stock options to $26 million plus? But to return to 9/11, the funny business has just begun. If you thought press performance after JFK's death was a cynical farce, you ain't seen nothing yet.) A few years back Harold Evans of the London Sunday Times, observed that the challenge facing American newspapers "is not to stay in business -- it is to stay in journalism.'' As corporations' authoritarian, profit-driven consciousness comes to dominate both media and governance, you can expect a lot more serial celebrity scandals and even less news on the way things work or anything that really counts. There is a clear method and message in this obscurantist madness. All this media consolidation and tightening control is strategically aligned with deregulation, privatization, social program-gutting deficits and free trade regimes. They are all convergent tactics to enforce corporations' full spectrum dominance over democratic humankind. If your progressive or conservative instincts bid you to arise against this coup, standing with our 9/11 widow is a good place to start. Her name is Ellen Mariani, her lawyer is Phillip Berg and their complaint is now online at http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html

12-05-2003, 12:13 PM	#10
ytcracker stc is the greatest Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: rip sean murray Posts: 12,403	if you dont like the goverment, then get the fuck up and start a revolution which we could probably have done pretty effectively if you faggot whining liberals didn't try to take our fucking guns away all the time __________________ www.ytcracker.com \| www.digitalgangster.com i love you

12-05-2003, 01:30 PM	#18
EscortBiz Fuck Checks, CASH only! Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York City Posts: 19,422	some people just never get it __________________ Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts ICQ# 158802076

12-05-2003, 01:35 PM	#19
BlueFly Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NC, USA Posts: 716	why is the word ASHCR0FT censored here? __________________ Now Taking Hard Link Trades BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.com

12-05-2003, 04:41 AM	#2
liquidmoe Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NY Posts: 4,994	Everyone should be aware that journalism in America for a while now has been about business and not attempting to find out the truth or present the state of world affairs in an objective manner to the people. But it is a bit shocking that despite knowing all of that, something as news worthy as this was completely shunned. I mean regardless of the amount of profiteering that is at the center of journalism you still think that if true news occurs they simply have to report it, well I guess that was a false hope.

12-05-2003, 05:02 AM	#3
Why MFBA Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PNW Posts: 7,230	id mail that to a few million americans, but i fear i would be imprisoned. seeing that since the patriot act went into effect, to speak out against ones government makes one a terrorist.

12-05-2003, 11:55 AM	#7
liquidmoe Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NY Posts: 4,994	Finally a proper thread gets a bump. Bottom line is people have been held in jail once again in recent years without being charged with crimes formally or having their case presented before a judge, not exactly the road of freedom and free speech.

12-05-2003, 12:09 PM	#8
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	Do you guys think the mainstream media will ever pick this story up? MAYBE when he gets found guilty. Maybe. I'm going to call CBC, I'm sure they'll run it if there's anything to this lawsuit.