Should you Star out hardcore pic's on paysite tours? - GoFuckYourself.com

Va2k · 11-14-2003, 01:19 PM

Running a paysite in the states should you star out the asshole,and any insertion. If so Why? Explain...

TOM

Digipimp · 11-14-2003, 01:22 PM

Personally I always blur or mosaic it so you can still tell what's happening for the most part but you can't really see it. Personally I'm not down with all the free porn and hardcore for free as well kids being able to view all of it easily. I don't think blurring or mosaics will ever prevent anyone from signing up.

11-14-2003, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Personally I always blur or mosaic it so you can still tell what's happening for the most part but you can't really see it. Personally I'm not down with all the free porn and hardcore for free as well kids being able to view all of it easily. I don't think blurring or mosaics will ever prevent anyone from signing up.

good way to see it, Im also interested in other opinions

Va2k · 11-14-2003, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Personally I always blur or mosaic it so you can still tell what's happening for the most part but you can't really see it. Personally I'm not down with all the free porn and hardcore for free as well kids being able to view all of it easily. I don't think blurring or mosaics will ever prevent anyone from signing up.

Damn good point

Digipimp · 11-14-2003, 01:28 PM

Maybe it's just me but it's all twofold. I'm not down with all the fucking TGP, MGP , hardcore movie samples, hardcore pics on tours and all that shit. It fucking makes it harder to sell anything without pushing the limits as well as it's all easily accessible without any worries as to the age of the viewer.

If the govt would crackdown on that shit I would be cool with it, then my blurred and mosaic tours and shit would convert better and so would everyone elses, so conversions would go up dramatically and children wouldn't have as easy access to free hardcore.

brand0n · 11-14-2003, 01:32 PM

yes, star it out so it makes em break out the credit card

C_U_Next_Tuesday · 11-14-2003, 01:51 PM

I think its our duty as responsible adults to not show hardcore in the tour... all those kids that pop on a site anyhows will still see it..even with the little warning. I do it out of courtesy to all those parents that dont monitor their kids..

Loryn · 11-14-2003, 01:59 PM

YES!!!!

Va2k · 11-14-2003, 02:00 PM

Thanks everyone

http://www.virginiaamateurs.com/index1.html if you could take a look tell me if there is anything else you would blur out, the join page is being done now so dont need to look at it,

TOM

Shoehorn! · 11-14-2003, 02:48 PM

I think it's a good idea, it makes people wonder what the pictures look like without the censorship. Then they buy a membership. It works well in theory.

Digipimp · 11-14-2003, 02:51 PM

Damn Tom I have to admit I would blur almost every picture on your tour in one way or another, there are plenty of dicks, pussy, facials and I personally don't leave any of that showing, that's considered a hardcore tour to me. I think the most you'll ever catch on my stuff that's unblurred or no mosaic is a nipple.

Libertine · 11-14-2003, 02:53 PM

Funny how everyone here seems to agree that that stuff should be censored, when just about no sites actually have it censored in their tours.

Oh, and if you worry about kids seeing that stuff, it might be an idea to quit submitting explicit galleries to tgps/offering hosted galleries.

Bunch of hypocrites

Digipimp · 11-14-2003, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Funny how everyone here seems to agree that that stuff should be censored, when just about no sites actually have it censored in their tours.

Oh, and if you worry about kids seeing that stuff, it might be an idea to quit submitting explicit galleries to tgps/offering hosted galleries.

Bunch of hypocrites

I think that's pretty much what I said earlier, all the hardcore hosted galleries, tgp, mgp and hardcore tours, hardcore movie samples and so on do nothing to help this industry even one bit. They make conversions higher, kids can see it and it just generally only makes it so that you have to get more hardcore for free just to try and get a couple signups.

Furious_Female · 11-14-2003, 03:01 PM

I show little to no nudity on my pages and it converts better than showing

Va2k · 11-14-2003, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Damn Tom I have to admit I would blur almost every picture on your tour in one way or another, there are plenty of dicks, pussy, facials and I personally don't leave any of that showing, that's considered a hardcore tour to me. I think the most you'll ever catch on my stuff that's unblurred or no mosaic is a nipple.

good point again, im not tooooooooo worried with the cum on faces just wanted to censored the actual insertion parts. I may redo some more thnks
TOM

gothweb · 11-14-2003, 03:58 PM

You left out conversions as a reason to do it.

jreaka · 11-14-2003, 04:09 PM

Besides the 2257, lawyers told us it is the most important thing to do. GOV. was about to crack down on this shit, but 9/11 sidetracked them.

spooky181 · 11-14-2003, 11:18 PM

I use pics on my tour www.cheatingxxxwife.com that are very extreme hardcore but cover up the main action. The surfer knows what is going on but cant quite see the naughty bits. This seems to get them whipping out their cards..

beemk · 11-14-2003, 11:24 PM

i always thought it was for conversions.

EZRhino · 11-14-2003, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Personally I always blur or mosaic it so you can still tell what's happening for the most part but you can't really see it. Personally I'm not down with all the free porn and hardcore for free as well kids being able to view all of it easily. I don't think blurring or mosaics will ever prevent anyone from signing up.

Well said

Why · 11-14-2003, 11:30 PM

cock lover.

MrIzzz · 11-14-2003, 11:31 PM

honeslty i dont believe any blurring etc matters, kids today are giving out bjs as part of making out on a routine basis, theyre going to see hardcore sooner or later its just the real young kids i'm concerned about

NaughtyJenn · 11-14-2003, 11:32 PM

i think there are some pro's and con's bout it... i do agree that people should prevent children from looking at porn, not just hardcore... but if they were supervised they wouldnt be at the site in the first place.. i dont blurr stuff out but i also have a splash page which has no nudity on it... although i have seen some splash pages that are just as hardcore as the tour.. then again it all comes down to why are the parents not supervising or monitoring or controling what sites their children goto.. thats the problem in my mind

View Poll Results: Should you Star out hardcore pic's on paysite tours?
Yes its the law	3	11.11%
No it isnt the law	8	29.63%
Yes to be safe	6	22.22%
yes its the right thing to do.	10	37.04%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

11-14-2003, 01:19 PM	#1
Va2k I’m still alive barley. Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Va Posts: 10,060	Should you Star out hardcore pic's on paysite tours? Running a paysite in the states should you star out the asshole,and any insertion. If so Why? Explain... TOM __________________

11-14-2003, 01:22 PM	#2
Digipimp BP4L OT DL Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BP4L Swap Meet Posts: 13,481	Personally I always blur or mosaic it so you can still tell what's happening for the most part but you can't really see it. Personally I'm not down with all the free porn and hardcore for free as well kids being able to view all of it easily. I don't think blurring or mosaics will ever prevent anyone from signing up. __________________ Still Hosting at Webair and You Should Be Too

11-14-2003, 01:28 PM	#5
Digipimp BP4L OT DL Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BP4L Swap Meet Posts: 13,481	Maybe it's just me but it's all twofold. I'm not down with all the fucking TGP, MGP , hardcore movie samples, hardcore pics on tours and all that shit. It fucking makes it harder to sell anything without pushing the limits as well as it's all easily accessible without any worries as to the age of the viewer. If the govt would crackdown on that shit I would be cool with it, then my blurred and mosaic tours and shit would convert better and so would everyone elses, so conversions would go up dramatically and children wouldn't have as easy access to free hardcore. __________________ Still Hosting at Webair and You Should Be Too

11-14-2003, 01:32 PM	#6
brand0n been very busy Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: the queen city Posts: 26,983	yes, star it out so it makes em break out the credit card __________________ want to buy this spot for cheap? it is of course for sale. long term deals are always the best bet. brand0n/ at/ a o l dot commies.

11-14-2003, 01:51 PM	#7
C_U_Next_Tuesday WW4L Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: over the river and through the woods Posts: 10,581	I think its our duty as responsible adults to not show hardcore in the tour... all those kids that pop on a site anyhows will still see it..even with the little warning. I do it out of courtesy to all those parents that dont monitor their kids..

11-14-2003, 01:59 PM	#8
Loryn Super Connector Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 12,853	YES!!!! __________________ ~ loryn@loryntaylor . com ~ RIP TD

11-14-2003, 02:00 PM	#9
Va2k I’m still alive barley. Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Va Posts: 10,060	Thanks everyone http://www.virginiaamateurs.com/index1.html if you could take a look tell me if there is anything else you would blur out, the join page is being done now so dont need to look at it, TOM __________________

11-14-2003, 02:48 PM	#10
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	I think it's a good idea, it makes people wonder what the pictures look like without the censorship. Then they buy a membership. It works well in theory.

11-14-2003, 02:51 PM	#11
Digipimp BP4L OT DL Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BP4L Swap Meet Posts: 13,481	Damn Tom I have to admit I would blur almost every picture on your tour in one way or another, there are plenty of dicks, pussy, facials and I personally don't leave any of that showing, that's considered a hardcore tour to me. I think the most you'll ever catch on my stuff that's unblurred or no mosaic is a nipple. __________________ Still Hosting at Webair and You Should Be Too

11-14-2003, 02:53 PM	#12
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	Funny how everyone here seems to agree that that stuff should be censored, when just about no sites actually have it censored in their tours. Oh, and if you worry about kids seeing that stuff, it might be an idea to quit submitting explicit galleries to tgps/offering hosted galleries. Bunch of hypocrites __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

11-14-2003, 03:01 PM	#14
Furious_Female Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Upstate, New York Posts: 8,187	I show little to no nudity on my pages and it converts better than showing __________________ Skype: j3nn.com ICQ 160370494 My current favorite high-converting sponsor: CrakRevenue

11-14-2003, 03:58 PM	#16
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	You left out conversions as a reason to do it. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

11-14-2003, 04:09 PM	#17
jreaka Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: California Posts: 1,096	Besides the 2257, lawyers told us it is the most important thing to do. GOV. was about to crack down on this shit, but 9/11 sidetracked them.

11-14-2003, 11:18 PM	#18
spooky181 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: back of beyond Posts: 2,951	I use pics on my tour www.cheatingxxxwife.com that are very extreme hardcore but cover up the main action. The surfer knows what is going on but cant quite see the naughty bits. This seems to get them whipping out their cards..

11-14-2003, 11:24 PM	#19
beemk CLICK HERE Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 20,829	i always thought it was for conversions. __________________ I host with Vacares

11-14-2003, 11:30 PM	#21
Why MFBA Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PNW Posts: 7,230	cock lover.

11-14-2003, 11:31 PM	#22
MrIzzz If u touch it, I will cum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: long island Posts: 22,923	honeslty i dont believe any blurring etc matters, kids today are giving out bjs as part of making out on a routine basis, theyre going to see hardcore sooner or later its just the real young kids i'm concerned about __________________ WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?

11-14-2003, 11:32 PM	#23
NaughtyJenn Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 7,355	i think there are some pro's and con's bout it... i do agree that people should prevent children from looking at porn, not just hardcore... but if they were supervised they wouldnt be at the site in the first place.. i dont blurr stuff out but i also have a splash page which has no nudity on it... although i have seen some splash pages that are just as hardcore as the tour.. then again it all comes down to why are the parents not supervising or monitoring or controling what sites their children goto.. thats the problem in my mind