Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2003, 05:35 PM   #1
bena1975ca
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 157
Unexcusable sites

Would I be the only person in the house that considers this site...what's the word I'm looking for here...wrong?!

http://www.16-19crazyteenz.com/

Now, forgive me if I'm wrong (and I very well may be), but isn't implying that the girls in your material are under age just as illegal as them actually being under age?

For instance...the 16sweet16 picture where frankly, the chick may as well be topless implies that this chick is under age...illegal or legal?

Perhaps someone would like to tell me what the standing is on this...

Ta muchly,

Ben
__________________
Brad is a bitch he's a big fat bitch he's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world...
bena1975ca is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 05:41 PM   #2
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
If they actually have 16 year olds then of course its illegal in the US (US Federal age of consent is 18 although some states can go as low as 16).

If they are actually 18 year olds and over, then the site is misleading. And may still be subject to state obscenity prosecution. Run a google search on Ginsburg vs. New York (US Supreme Court holding that marketing NON Obscene materials as Obscene or illegal can lead to obscenity charges)
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 05:41 PM   #3
Brad-Wishing
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,415
My personal opinion is that it would be wrong - but then again I don't know the laws on this so I have no official word.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Brad-Wishing is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 05:52 PM   #4
Bigjohn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deep inside my mind
Posts: 1,118
Definately wrong anyway you look at it.
Bigjohn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 06:00 PM   #5
LadyMischief
Orgasms N Such!
 
LadyMischief's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Posts: 18,135
If a girl is portrayed strongly as being underage, engaging in activities considered to be strictly childlike activities, it doesn't matter HOW old the model is, in many cases it would still be considered CP.
__________________

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
LadyMischief is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 06:12 PM   #6
bena1975ca
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 157
I really don't feel that this site constitutes "childlike activities"...in fact, there's one link on it that claims 13-19 content...which I find really distasteful.
__________________
Brad is a bitch he's a big fat bitch he's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world...
bena1975ca is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 06:16 PM   #7
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Sorry to say this, but there's heaps of sites like that that pump traffic around (check out the toplist). This is the dirty world of <18 "non nude" *cough cough*
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 06:24 PM   #8
IntenseCash
Confirmed User
 
IntenseCash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,421
thats a site I would report... the girls on the site still look very young... report it!
__________________
IntenseCash.com
~ Chuck | ICQ: 444887112
Top converting sites:
BrokeStraightBoys.com, CollegeDudes.com & CollegeBoyPhysicals.com
IntenseCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 07:16 PM   #9
timboss
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 627
if you report it , what will happen?

I was getting spammed from a sleaze who kept emailing me links to join a 'lolita' site.

It was really fucked up, very young girls.

I reported this to the fbi, and as many agencies as possible,
nothing happened...

the guy was out of russia, is this how these fuckers get away with it? Are other countries so fucked up, there is no law against it?
__________________
ICQ:
338637464
timboss is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 07:58 PM   #10
ModelPerfect
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,862
For the lawyers out there: Wasn't there a recent US Supreme Court case that basically said you could pass a girl off as underaged as long as she wasn't actually a minor? I think this turned the old notion that having an 18+ girl surrounded by childish objects, such as lollipops + teddy bears, was arguably CP.

I agree it's wrong, but I do remember reading something about that maybe a year ago... Can anyone confirm or deny?
ModelPerfect is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 08:17 PM   #11
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
If they are outside the U.S. then the laws of their country may allow 16 years olds to be nude.

U.S. laws only apply to the U.S.
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 08:17 PM   #12
klik
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: san diego
Posts: 5,092
Quote:
Originally posted by rowan
Sorry to say this, but there's heaps of sites like that that pump traffic around (check out the toplist). This is the dirty world of <18 "non nude" *cough cough*
that same guy owns well over 100+ questionable domains.. check all those links out.
klik is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.