|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
The squeaky wheel gets the grease
Watch out Acacia, and here is a good reason to get involved in the fight.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In an unusual move, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is considering whether to revoke a patent that Internet experts claim could hobble Web browsing and online commerce. The office's top patent-examination official has ordered a review of a patent that covers the ability of Web browsers to display multimedia content, the office confirmed on Thursday. PTO Deputy Commissioner Stephen Kunin ordered the review after Internet engineers said the patent did not cover an original invention and would cause massive disruption for Web users, spokeswoman Brigid Quinn said. "The director has to have received quite a bit of input from the community" to order a review, Quinn said. The full article is here Essentially what this is saying is that if enough people complain to the patent office, they will review patents. What should be noted is towards the bottom where it says, The Patent Office receives roughly 400 requests for review each year, Quinn said, but fewer than 2 percent of them come from a director. Patents placed under director-ordered review are less likely to be upheld Do you think we could up that average a little by the end of the day? I do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
|
I agree, its worth a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
hey, they normally get 400 requests a year, I expect we can get that many in a matter of hours
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
I am going to keep bumping this for a while
|
|
|
|