Cam Guys

[sickkittens]

Do they actually make money on iFriends and sites like that? If 1 out of every 3 or 4 porn surfers is a girl, then would'nt these guys do well seeing how there like 10% guys vs. 90% girls on cam sites?

[freeadultcontent]

They make most of their money from other men. Humor is seeing men in a straight category fully thinking that 19 year old amy really is 19 and a female.

[who]

No because there's so many guys wanking on cam for free, just go into any 'teen' chatroom and write the magic words '14/f/cali'.

All the gay places have free live cams so for men it's not much of a 'pull'... err..

[sickkittens]

How do they do ($ wise) in comparison to females?

[Sean]

they dont make much at all

[detoxed]

my dreams are broken

[freeadultcontent]

Originally posted by sickkittens
How do they do ($ wise) in comparison to females?

If your speaking in regards to ifriends, it is way to friggen based on variables to give a number. I am not to up on many of the other cam sites though. Generally in comparrison the cash would suck ass. A guy would be lucky making 200-300 a week if he relied on the cam site. That is until you throw in the variables.

With the proper thought pattern, web ability, and motivation a guy could earn a hell of a lot more than the standard female chathost on ifriends. Easily in the 1500-2500 a week range.

[who]

They only do well in a couple scenario with at least one female.

[freeadultcontent]

Originally posted by .?.
They only do well in a couple scenario with at least one female.

That is very off base. In a couples feed the guy makes even less than he could solo. He must split it with the female which removes at least half the income. Then he has all of the performance issues to deal with that are technically insane.

[who]

With the proper thought pattern, web ability, and motivation a guy could earn a hell of a lot more than the standard female chathost

With the proper thought pattern, web ability, and motivation, ANYONE could make more than a standard female chathost.

A big factor is that there's not any number of gay/male studios around, maybe a few, but most of the guys are doing it from their bedroom or so on, meaning that there's no buffer of a studio income to back them up if they have a bad run.

And they often do, because iFriends and CamContacts don't encourage male chathosts even one iota.. they simply 'allow' it.

[who]

Originally posted by freeadultcontent


That is very off base. In a couples feed the guy makes even less than he could solo. He must split it with the female which removes at least half the income. Then he has all of the performance issues to deal with that are technically insane.

Yes but he's going to be involved in about 400% more sessions than if it was just him going solo.

[freeadultcontent]

Originally posted by .?.


With the proper thought pattern, web ability, and motivation, ANYONE could make more than a standard female chathost.

A big factor is that there's not any number of gay/male studios around, maybe a few, but most of the guys are doing it from their bedroom or so on, meaning that there's no buffer of a studio income to back them up if they have a bad run.

And they often do, because iFriends and CamContacts don't encourage male chathosts even one iota.. they simply 'allow' it.

Wasnt speaking on a studio standpoint, was assuming both female solo chathost and male solo chathost were both working from home on their own.

You are right about sites just allowing men though.

[hyatla]

I don't get it why gay guys pay to see a webcam. Go to a gym or a bathhouse, real men, real action.

[freeadultcontent]

Originally posted by .?.
Yes but he's going to be involved in about 400% more sessions than if it was just him going solo.

Really now? This would be based again on some of the variables. If the hosts are reling purely on the sites internal traffic yes, if they host is driving their own traffic no.

[who]

Originally posted by freeadultcontent


Wasnt speaking on a studio standpoint, was assuming both female solo chathost and male solo chathost were both working from home on their own.

You are right about sites just allowing men though.

Sorry, I misunderstood the word 'standard' to mean studio based, which is what I believe the vast majority of female CH's are.


Well the original question in this thread was do they make money.. well, they do, but not much, because there's just none that are promoted properly, perhaps from fear of being frowned apon by the owners of the cam sites.

Solo transvestites are probably making more money on camsites than solo guys.

[freeadultcontent]

Transvestites generally make more than nearly all solo girls, couples, and men.

[freeadultcontent]

Originally posted by .?.
Well the original question in this thread was do they make money.. well, they do, but not much, because there's just none that are promoted properly, perhaps from fear of being frowned apon by the owners of the cam sites.

Yes and there is the variable. If a performer can drive their own traffic and not rely on the sites often shrinking internal traffic anyone can do well, specially men if they do not mind catering to other men.

Using ifriends as an example. A performer that can drive their own traffic will always be way better off. Using a higher than average per minute rate (above 2.50 a minute) in combination with mass targeted gay feeder sites using clickcash. Which gets you 35.00 or so a sign up, plus 100% of the revenue when that person is watching you. Used in tandum with the 90% shopping cart, the 100% replay feeds, the 90% websites, and the fanclubs one can easily do very well per week.

[MetaformX]

lots of gays on ifriends