![]() |
Imagine if the US government had a video on its website, could Acacia then demand 2% of gross government revenue?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They believe in female equality. : ) Who wouldn't? |
What I do not understand is why would Plat Bucks settle if they are a Canadien corporation. I wonder how that worked out. Also remember there were a number of rounds of letters going out....
|
Quote:
for their digital transmissions called DMT ? |
Quote:
ZoiNk |
Quote:
That's why I asked earlier if NASA had to report to Acacia, and how that would work? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hear you. Are we ever going to meet? |
Quote:
"43 licences at $2000 each wow how great" also he said "I bet it will be around $100,000 form licences" To which you responded: "Thats funny cause my company settled and we should make up your entire pretiction of revenues alone. " (At least I think it was you. Platinum_Investor is you right?) So the guy is guessing $100k... you are suggesting you contributed that much or almost that much on your own. Dave, that's not a tiny part of their revenue. That's over half of what they reported for that past quarter. If you've been trading this stock... man, I dunno, but it can't be good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Damn
well..if you know your gonna settle..buy a bunch of stock,settle, turn over your affilates, then cash in big time! well..thats one hypothetical isnt it? pump and dump! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This whole thing just bums me out. :(
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the looks of the posts on yahoo finance... we are not the only ones who thing Acacia is shady |
Quote:
Far-L... any way these little guys can joint your suit ? The guys that are going to end up getting served soon? $35k is a lot for most of them to pay.. what about $3k or $4k?? |
Quote:
|
this thread got real boring somehow.
i guess that's what happens when i dont stay involved. |
Quote:
:winkwink: |
Quote:
I wonder what they would answer to that lol... "Ladies and Gentlemen, According to ACACIA's Claims of Owning the DMT Technology, every company using Such technology as "streaming" or "downloading" any form of video clip would be inclined to give 2% of the gross revenue away as a liscence. According to our observations, The US Government has been using the DMT Technology for quite some time... Please take the time to analyse if 2% of 4,000+ Billion dollars every year for the past XX years since the debut of the patent is a rightful claim. Would 80 billions a year for a liscence fee make any sense to you at all? Now each of the defendants don't gross 4000+ billions a year... but the same reasoning stand." LOL |
Quote:
We settled one week ago. So our revenue will go into their next quarter which they say will be 1 million plus. It was a guess before earnings came out, how much Acacia earned from licence agreements. |
Quote:
PULLING TEETH Hoopers show = An expensive ugly date that doesn't put out! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I received the Acacia letter a few minutes ago. The letter was addressed with my real name which is not known except by the companies I signed up as an affiliate. From the Acacia settlement list, I signed up with Hustler and Vivid only. My real name does not appear with my domain registrar.
Fuck you Hustler and Vivid. You get no business from me. You violated my right to privacy. I phoned Acacia to tell them that their patent didn't apply to me since I only dish out escort ads. Funny that the only two people that could legally explain the issues to me were 'out of town'. |
Quote:
Giorgio, Sorry, but you are 100% wrong and you should be careful about coming to fast assumptions and making false accusations. Your irresponsible and false accusations could hurt our business and we take that very seriously. Neither Hustler nor Vivid has given (or ever will give) Acacia ANY affiliate information. Period. I expect you to provide proof of your allegations or post a retraction and an apology immediately. |
THIER BEING BACKED BY THE US GOVERMENT , AOL , MS.
WHO IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK GAVE THEM YOUR INFO ? |
Why do so many people think that the published list includes all the companies that have signed? Odd notion.
|
Quote:
There are a number of threads where people have mentioned Matrix as a possible sell out. I don't know, I am just reposting what others have said here on GFY. |
Quote:
I am not liable for any apology. If my comments about Hustler and Vivid defame to the point of hurting your business, your business is already sunk. The last time I checked with Hoover's both Hustler and Vivid were both doing $100MM in sales a year. A poor little webmaster with 25,000 uniques make you feel scared? Hustler, et al shouldn't have cut a deal. |
Quote:
I have never purchased content from Matrix. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
the letter i got used a nickname i rarely use, and neither hustler, vivid nor matrix have that nickname. i'm pretty sure ce does not have it either.
any more ideas on who it could be? |
Quote:
|
damn, i had to read 2 pages to catch up since i left last night and didnt come up with anything worth reading. thanks guys:glugglug
|
Quote:
You said "You violated my right to privacy.". That is NOT a fact. This is a false statement and I don't take it lightly. We did not share your information, nor will we ever share any affiliate information unless we were forced to by a court order. Last night Fletch XXX jumped the gun and named Hustler as the possible culprit. Upon further investigation he apologized and acknowledged that he jumped to conclusions to fast. I was not happy with his initial statement, but he was smart enough to investigate further and man enough to admit his mistake. Are you? You are entitled to your opinion about Hustler and Vivid settling, however, you are not entitled to make false accusations. |
Quote:
Wait...first you were sure it was Hustler and Vivid and now you're gathering a list? Why am I not surprised..... I'm growing very tired of all the finger pointing without any hard facts. |
Quote:
I give you credit. You are one of the few standing here in defense of companies you work for. There are many companies that have not posted one word in their defense. I think Giorgio_Xo might be jumping the gun a bit but I think you are as well. You don't need to say "I'm gonna sue you if you talk bad about me" for people to know where you're coming from. A lot of people feel like they're drowning and don't need more threats when they come up for air. :2 cents: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123