So what you are saying is you would have to go to Hertz and sort it out. Sounds fine to me thanks for agreeing. :thumbsup

no I would just have to change info not pay again, and thats only because of their insurance - they wouldn't get any more or less money.

Why do you have such an license ?
What if he sells his name along with the sale then it's ok.
Just like a company.

Usally we setup a bunch of URLs along with the license.
If the pix is still on the url what different does it make if it's
not the guy fromt he start anymore ?

Here's a TIP when you sell a site:

Sell everything BUT you keep your name on the license
and you are a non profit partner for life without any
responsibilities regarding anything.

or like broke said, just use your business.

Exactly! People here need to learn about business practice before posting.


Youve obviously never rented a car, we have 5 cars on lease here, when someone leaves you think we phone up the leasing company? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

that was kinda implicit in "reading the license" but whatever.

Sounds logical.....

fiddy :glugglug

I had a brief conversation with Matrix regarding selling pre-made tours with their content and they said it was fine so long as the buyer was registered with Matrix so they could KEEP TRACK OF who had their content. They made no mention of additional fees of any type.

:2 cents:

And on business in general...falling back on "it says it's not transferable [in your license]" is silly. You wrote it. You can save your business by changing it. My terms of service say that I will not work without a 50% deposit. But guess what? I might if I know you and if I don't ...well ...it might be more

:winkwink:

Charly stop being a dumb fuck man. You aren't renting the fucking content for a monthly fee like a hertz rental :feels-hot

What is your problem with the content staying with the domain? It isn't exposing the content any more than it currently is. You have the reasoning of an old goat mate :thumbsup

Instead of screaming about acting as a business, may'be you should look at contracts before you click on the box that says "I agree"

Also acting as a business, he should get in contact with me before he makes an offer to sell something he does not own, or he may not. Also the majority of people who buy content from me do it as an INDIVIDUAL not as a company, also am I meant to go searching to see who he is, because of his mistakes?

Any reason he will not post the licenses before he gets his money, or am I being paranoid?

And yes I have contacted him by email and ICQ before I posted here.

hahah im arguing and disagreeing with myself cause I'm misreading... fuck it's time for bed..

Hes not selling your content hes selling his business.


A business is a item in its own entirety. The people who work for the business or even own the business are NOT the business, if a business changes shareholders or employees, that makes no difference it?s the same business, the debts are still due to that business whoever in the company run those debts up. They still own the assets and still owned money by their creditors.

forget it Johhny he will not understand or maybe doesn't want to understand.

do you give his money back when he dont use your content anymore ?

I think your right and its a good indication of his knowledge of the law..... I would seriously think about someone selling content who doesnt understand basic business practices, especially when buying content incase hes also managed not to have the proper paperwork reguarding important things like model id,s and permision..... makes you think before buying doesnt it

Kevin
I just want to know who he is selling it to and the courtesy of the guy doing business as he agreed to when he bought the content. Or is it just that you can agree to one thing one minute and then when it suits you just change the agreement?

Like today we can give you 50% of all sign ups and tomorrow we can't, and we will not tell you about it either. There are set ways to do business, one is to read a contract and if you agree to it, STICK TO THE DEAL.

Nice to see how many of you think licenses, contracts and aggreements are irrelevant when it suits you.

I think these things are important, If I don't agree to it I dont sign up to it. Just a different perspective I suppose.

I'm off to see Bob Dylan so you can carry on without me. :)

LOL very good point and knowing Charly's logic the older the content is the more valuable it is like wine or something :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

we are looking at it as businesses, how are you looking at it?

And nobody even has commented on why he wants out, any Australians out there better watch out....

Why? All Australians host their sites off shore which is perfectly legal here. You are allowed to have all your sites and content on your server in Victoria as long as you don't host it here LOL.

Another dumb law they have in Victoria is you can shoot hardcore pics but not video.

My business DVXPRESS licenced the content, my business is for sale. The business retains ownership of the content . My business Paypal account was used to transact these purchases, its open and closed.. no argument. Thats the end of the matter.

As far as the accusation that my site is a rip off of someone elses, it's not. It may look similar, but then again any teen site with pastel colours, love hearts, cupid arrows and bow style borders is bound to look similar in a world of black background sites with nasty looking whores and in your face text.

The "Sweet Teens" logo has been around since 1996.. the site colours have been in use on various incarnations of these and other sites for years.

:thumbsup

I'm selling my TGPs and domains. See sig or contact me.

like a hawk charly watchs his content

Funny how times have changed. From crazy rules to now he can't even give it away. Good job Paul!

This thread delivers :glugglug

lol WTF is this?

OMG started to read a fucking 9 years o;d thread and wondered why all the fucking links were dead.

I thought you retired ?

LOL holy crap I didnt even realize the dates

9 long years :)

Content should be limited to the site and not owner, because what if owner want to change niche? atleast to the domain thats resnoble... sorry spelling :)

+1 :thumbsup:1orglaugh

Funny how people now need to bump 9 year old threads to get attention.

KRL hasn't posted in 6 years... yet, - Last Activity: 06-24-2012 03:21 PM

People may be confusing persons with businesses, both legal entities in the eyes of contract law.

If AK's business is selling the site, content is non-transferable, because the content would need to be transferred to a new owner. If he is selling the business, the legal entity which licensed the content, then the content is not transferring, only ownership of the owner. In the latter case the content is NOT transferring.

If Pepsi licenses your content and new shareholders buy it, that is not your content transferring.

:1orglaugh