|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
10-15-2003, 11:04 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,159
|
Manual Patent Invalidation through Patent Office?
Has anybody ever tried to manually invalidate Acacia's patent? So many prior art posts with no solutions.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac.../2200_2214.htm "(a) Any person may, at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent, file a request for an ex parte reexamination by the Office of any claim of the patent on the basis of prior art patents or printed publications cited under § 1.501. The request must be accompanied by the fee for requesting reexamination set in § 1.20(c)(1)." |
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:05 AM
|
#2 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hanging by the neck until dead.
Posts: 4,660
|
Where is anyone here going to get $1,000?
|
|
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:06 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,159
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:08 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
then what would all the keyboard warriors argue about??? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:11 AM
|
#5 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere between my monitor and my chair
Posts: 3,214
|
Thats why many companies dont mention the patents they are going for until they are approved
 |
|
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:27 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
 Before anyone gets any wild ideas on this, please get with the defense group. The problem with filing a request for ex parte reexamination is that the initial arguments given in the filing are going to be the only arguments you're allowed. If a reexamination is granted, you're out of the loop from that point on. The holder of the patent and the PTO will then argue back and forth and if your one-time presentation is flawed in the slightest, the PTO will side with the patent holder. The prior art that was submitted, along with the failed argument, then becomes part of the patent's file wrapper (the background documents that are part of the overall record of the granted patent). The problem that arises then, is anyone else that could've presented a stronger argument regarding that prior art is hampered in the future because of the previous failure. So, again, before anyone gets any wild ideas on this, please get with the defense group.
__________________
<CENTER><A HREF="http://www.hot-off-bourbon.com/" target="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://www.hot-off-bourbon.com/images/hob-logosmall.jpg" border="0"></A> <FONT face="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="-1"><I>Mardi Gras, Spring Break, Wet-T, Night Club Action, UpSkirt, Oil Wrestling, Voyeur</I></FONT></CENTER> |
|
|
|
|
