GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Brad attacks Steve Lightspeed? You got to be fucking kidding (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=184738)

Spunky 10-10-2003 09:22 PM

100 ..Never trust a man who slams Canada

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw



Sleazy, I am not going to split hairs. This accomplishes nothing.I have my opinion of Steve's business model. We are not talking 18 looking like 17 here............ I think many of you here need to either hire a lawyer, or speak to a lawyer who deals in this business. They would explain to you, that images of 19 year old girls who are dressed to look 15 is not wise.

I've dealt with many lawyers in and out of this business.
I scorred a 95th percentile on the lsat exam myself.
any lawyer that is advising you that the 'clothing' of model could make them look a couple of years younger probally shouldn't be a lawyer to the adult business, as they SHOULD be more concerned with the documentation of the age of the model then their costume.

-=HOAX=- 10-10-2003 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw
I was eating dinner, I do not sit on gfy 24/7 sorry;-)

Each of us draw the line where we feel comfortable. I have no problem with our site, or the images contained on it. All of our websites have been approved by our legal council.

Our "school" girl site, the girls look 21, not even 18, lol. Not going to split hairs here. The images speak for themselves.

Yeah your models look 29 but you imply they're "Young Schoolgirls"...At least LS can find decent talent...brand them...and have men falling over themselves to join...

I got no beef or allegiance to anyone...but I gotta say..."Hypocrite" would be the right word...

Burn enough bridges and you end up stranded on an island...


"Might as well go work at wendy's"

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw



Sleazy, I am not going to split hairs.

typical - you always back away when someone smokes you.

DarkJedi 10-10-2003 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman

http://tourimages.com/tours/easyscho...xxvideo/06.jpg

What's a YOUNG SCHOOLGIRL Brad? 9 years old?

See it on Brad's page: http://link.siccash.com/cgi-bin/load...0114022/3710/1


http://sexy-celebs.net/hotlink/columbo.jpg

Buff 10-10-2003 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


I've dealt with many lawyers in and out of this business.
I scorred a 95th percentile on the lsat exam myself.
any lawyer that is advising you that the 'clothing' of model could make them look a couple of years younger probally shouldn't be a lawyer to the adult business, as they SHOULD be more concerned with the documentation of the age of the model then their costume.

Are we dropping standardized test scores? The LSAT was easy as fuck -- I got a 168 on it cold. That test doesn't have diddly shit to do with the actual statutes in question, so why would you even mention your LSAT score? But you know what? I think you're lying anyway. I doubt you broke 70%. on it. My guess is you scored low 150s at best, but more likely mid 140s.

I hate braggarts.

Odin88 10-10-2003 09:32 PM

Sorry, just had to change my pic ;)

I still have the other one saved, so if he ever does change it (which seems doubtful) just hit me up for it.

:)

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman


http://tourimages.com/tours/easyscho...xxvideo/06.jpg

What's a YOUNG SCHOOLGIRL Brad? 9 years old?

See it on Brad's page: http://link.siccash.com/cgi-bin/load...0114022/3710/1


to ME a "yound schoolgirl" is a 25 year old dressed up in a cheap plaid skirt big enough to cover her stretch marks and knee highs to hide the vericose veins...

Sleazy.. this is not about legal advise.. its about one persons personal opinion.. just like you are entiled to your opinion...btw i scored a 23 on my MCATS... which is a shit score. .. thus i'm a pornographer and not an OBGYN....

Buff 10-10-2003 09:34 PM

Damn Greg! That's pretty low for an Asian ;)

Bladewire 10-10-2003 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
my two cents, theres a bit of a difference between a blurb of text on a cookie cutter paysite with girls that dont look young, and building ones whole business on a foundation of a girl that is 18 and looks 16.
:thumbsup

Mike AI 10-10-2003 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


I've dealt with many lawyers in and out of this business.
I scorred a 95th percentile on the lsat exam myself.
any lawyer that is advising you that the 'clothing' of model could make them look a couple of years younger probally shouldn't be a lawyer to the adult business, as they SHOULD be more concerned with the documentation of the age of the model then their costume.

HAHAHA

"I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV..."

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -=HOAX=-


Yeah your models look 29 but you imply they're "Young Schoolgirls"...At least LS can find decent talent...brand them...and have men falling over themselves to join...

I got no beef or allegiance to anyone...but I gotta say..."Hypocrite" would be the right word...

Burn enough bridges and you end up stranded on an island...


"Might as well go work at wendy's"


True... LS can find some great talent and they do a great job of marketing them... and I'm sure they make great $$$... and they are great guys... and they are very hospitable.... and they are great philanthropist and they throw great parties.... and Tanker makes a great impression of an otter....

BUT

Brad is still entiled to his opinon
:Graucho

Wiseman 10-10-2003 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by THE WISEMAN


I am Very good friends with Brad and Steve!!!
And I feel these arguements between the two are very much useless and good for nothing except.....

Have I mentioned? QUICKBUCK IS STILL PAYING $50 PER $2.99 TRIAL through the end of the weekend!!!

I just wanted to let everyone know again!!

BradShaw 10-10-2003 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


I've dealt with many lawyers in and out of this business.
I scorred a 95th percentile on the lsat exam myself.
any lawyer that is advising you that the 'clothing' of model could make them look a couple of years younger probally shouldn't be a lawyer to the adult business, as they SHOULD be more concerned with the documentation of the age of the model then their costume.


Like I said, hire one of the top adult entertainment lawyers. You are not a lawyer, just because you scored well on the LSAT. I scored poorly, but I hired a lawyer to do the work for me.

Buff 10-10-2003 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI


HAHAHA

"I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV..."

Don't you have your Law Degree, Mike? How come you're not bragging about it?

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Damn Greg! That's pretty low for an Asian ;)

i'm not Asian.. i'm a sleepy mexican

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff


Are we dropping standardized test scores? The LSAT was easy as fuck -- I got a 168 on it cold. That test doesn't have diddly shit to do with the actual statutes in question, so why would you even mention your LSAT score? But you know what? I think you're lying anyway. I doubt you broke 70%. on it. My guess is you scored low 150s at best, but more likely mid 140s.

I hate braggarts.

i took several law school courses actually - loved them although not officically registered for them. With my LSAT score I could have gotten into any law school in canada, and that was after my first year of university, not second or third.

you're just bitter cause you didn't get in.

You read john grisham and listen to him talk about lawyers GOUGING their clients for $250/hour.

I read the same book and realized that I wanted to be the client that didn't care.

BradShaw 10-10-2003 09:41 PM

Going to spend time with my lady.













Bottom line is that my opinion is my opinion. I will keep spouting it when I see fit to do so. Steve can continue to butter up webmasters with drug filled parties and a little pussy that most could never get in their real lives. I will continue to laugh all the way to the bank being a businessman.

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw



Like I said, hire one of the top adult entertainment lawyers. You are not a lawyer, just because you scored well on the LSAT. I scored poorly, but I hired a lawyer to do the work for me.


brad, if you take anything away from this take this.

you tell your lawyers what you want to do and they find out how to get it done. NOT the REVERSE. NEVER the REVERSE.

any other way of interaction with MOST lawyers spells business disaster.

Bladewire 10-10-2003 09:44 PM

:glugglug

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw

Bottom line is that my opinion is my opinion. I will keep spouting it when I see fit to do so. Steve can continue to butter up webmasters with drug filled parties and a little pussy that most could never get in their real lives. I will continue to laugh all the way to the bank being a businessman.

I've never been to any party steve threw that was full of women and I've never even smoked a joint in my life so if you're infering those are the reasons I endorse Steve then you're on Crack.....

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream



brad, if you take anything away from this take this.

you tell your lawyers what you want to do and they find out how to get it done. NOT the REVERSE. NEVER the REVERSE.

any other way of interaction with MOST lawyers spells business disaster.


you look at your bank balance and brad will look at his.. then offer him more advice :winkwink:

Buff 10-10-2003 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


i took several law school courses actually - loved them although not officically registered for them. With my LSAT score I could have gotten into any law school in canada, and that was after my first year of university, not second or third.

you're just bitter cause you didn't get in.

You read john grisham and listen to him talk about lawyers GOUGING their clients for $250/hour.

I read the same book and realized that I wanted to be the client that didn't care.

Jackass. I was accepted to Loyola, New Orleans, Tulane, Stetson, and George Mason. But I was accepted for the JD/MBA program for each of those, not just Law School. I'll be going next fall.

So are you saying you dropped out?
My guess is you weren't making the grade or couldn't pass the bar (or whatever the Canadian equivalent is).

Bladewire 10-10-2003 09:47 PM

Man I came to GFY to make some money and pump up sales on my 3 year old site.... instead theres this bitchy he said she said crap....

Stop attacking eachother and work together to keep the money coming in!

Carrie 10-10-2003 09:48 PM

I wouldn't want a lawyer who is only concerned with the legal documentation and licenses for the content on my site.

I would want one who has enough experience to know that those things mean shit to a jury who is staring, wide-eyed and slack-jawed, at images the prosecuting attorney is putting before them and they are being asked to make a judgement based on those images.

Mr and Mrs Mom & Pop jury aren't going to care if your girl is legally 18, they're going to care that the images they're seeing look like 15 and 16 yr-old girls. Quite frankly, once they've gotten that impression from the images, it doesn't matter what the licenses or photo IDs say. You're done. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


I've never been to any party steve threw that was full of women and I've never even smoked a joint in my life so if you're infering those are the reasons I endorse Steve then you're on Crack.....



i've been to many lightspeed parties.. always hospitible... always good crowds and people... always lots of fun.. but ya know what...

brad will still have his own opinion... deja vu????

Bladewire 10-10-2003 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
I wouldn't want a lawyer who is only concerned with the legal documentation and licenses for the content on my site.

I would want one who has enough experience to know that those things mean shit to a jury who is staring, wide-eyed and slack-jawed, at images the prosecuting attorney is putting before them and they are being asked to make a judgement based on those images.

Mr and Mrs Mom & Pop jury aren't going to care if your girl is legally 18, they're going to care that the images they're seeing look like 15 and 16 yr-old girls. Quite frankly, once they've gotten that impression from the images, it doesn't matter what the licenses or photo IDs say. You're done. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

Good point.. it all comes down to obscenity and community standards... is the community more approvng of an older looking chick dressed like a schoolgirl or an 18 year old that dresses and looks much younger? What's legal and what's community standard is what decides these cases..

gregtx 10-10-2003 09:53 PM

ok.. i'm done pissing.. it makes me feel dirty... stupid and like i just wasted an hour of sleep...

hope everyone is doing well... Sleazy.. you are a stand up dude.. and I still like ya :thumbsup

Lensman.. thanks for the late night cap... I jsut wanted to check my email... but was summoned by wiseman to see all of the fun...
hope all is well... .ski season is coming up quick...

peace

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
I wouldn't want a lawyer who is only concerned with the legal documentation and licenses for the content on my site.

I would want one who has enough experience to know that those things mean shit to a jury who is staring, wide-eyed and slack-jawed, at images the prosecuting attorney is putting before them and they are being asked to make a judgement based on those images.

Mr and Mrs Mom & Pop jury aren't going to care if your girl is legally 18, they're going to care that the images they're seeing look like 15 and 16 yr-old girls. Quite frankly, once they've gotten that impression from the images, it doesn't matter what the licenses or photo IDs say. You're done. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

a good lawyer doesn't tell you the sky is falling.

Mike AI 10-10-2003 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


i took several law school courses actually - loved them although not officically registered for them. With my LSAT score I could have gotten into any law school in canada, and that was after my first year of university, not second or third.

you're just bitter cause you didn't get in.

You read john grisham and listen to him talk about lawyers GOUGING their clients for $250/hour.

I read the same book and realized that I wanted to be the client that didn't care.

I stayed at a Holiday Inn express....

$250/hour is cheap for attorneys.

BradShaw 10-10-2003 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
I wouldn't want a lawyer who is only concerned with the legal documentation and licenses for the content on my site.

I would want one who has enough experience to know that those things mean shit to a jury who is staring, wide-eyed and slack-jawed, at images the prosecuting attorney is putting before them and they are being asked to make a judgement based on those images.

Mr and Mrs Mom & Pop jury aren't going to care if your girl is legally 18, they're going to care that the images they're seeing look like 15 and 16 yr-old girls. Quite frankly, once they've gotten that impression from the images, it doesn't matter what the licenses or photo IDs say. You're done. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.


This about sums it up. Very well put. I agree, $250 is not going to get you a good lawyer who understands this business.

Blondie23 10-10-2003 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gregtx



to ME a "yound schoolgirl" is a 25 year old dressed up in a cheap plaid skirt big enough to cover her stretch marks and knee highs to hide the vericose veins...

....


haha love ya greg... but thats funny.. vericose veins at 25? .. dont you get them when you're about 80?
maybe you need to come check out us aussie girls:)

Ketadream 10-10-2003 10:02 PM

Granted this was created for print and possibly video it does say something...or shall I say it does not say something...

Now I know this is an Ultra Consertive list
And Paul Cambria is trying to be OVER consertive but the fact is with our administration shit could hit the fan any second.

But even with its ultra consertive nature there is no mention of younging girls down...which i thought was interesting.

Just some food for thought...

The Cambria List:

Box-Cover Guidelines/Movie Production Guidelines

Before selecting a chrome please check facial expression. Do not use any shots that depict any unhappiness or pain.


Do not include any of the following:

No shots with appearance of pain or degradation

No facials (bodyshots are OK if shot is not nasty)

No bukakke

No spitting or saliva mouth to mouth

No food used as sex object

No peeing unless in a natural setting, e.g., field, roadside

No coffins

No blindfolds

No wax dripping

No two dicks in/near one mouth

No shot of stretching pussy

No fisting

No squirting

No bondage-type toys or gear unless very light

No girls sharing same dildo (in mouth or pussy)

Toys are OK if shot is not nasty

No hands from 2 different people fingering same girl

No male/male penetration

No transsexuals

No bi-sex

No degrading dialogue, e.g., "Suck this cock, bitch" while slapping her face with a penis

No menstruation topics

No incest topics

No forced sex, rape themes, etc.

No black men-white women themes

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI


I stayed at a Holiday Inn express....

$250/hour is cheap for attorneys.

i agree, one of the ones I use is $450/hour (although that's canadian)

that's just the dollar amount I remember from the grisham books

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff


Jackass. I was accepted to Loyola, New Orleans, Tulane, Stetson, and George Mason. But I was accepted for the JD/MBA program for each of those, not just Law School. I'll be going next fall.

So are you saying you dropped out?
My guess is you weren't making the grade or couldn't pass the bar (or whatever the Canadian equivalent is).


Are you an idiot? Obviously
You don't goto the bar till AFTER you graduate with a law degree.
I said I didn't goto law school.

if you're going to law school obviously you failed in this biz.

Good luck with law school - maybe you'll wind up as some leather chair warmer for a fortune 500 company. By 40 you may have your student loans paid off.
at least you'll be able to tell you grandkids that when you were young you posted to GFY and actually spoke to some guys that run real adult sites.

Jimbo 10-10-2003 10:09 PM

sorry I was fucking a young schoolgirl

wanna join up brad? :Graucho

snuff boy 10-10-2003 10:09 PM

Steve reminds me of when the Hell's Angles do Santa runs at Christmas. :1orglaugh

OzMan 10-10-2003 10:10 PM

:rainfro :rainfro :rainfro :rainfro :rainfro <<<(almost as good as a flash banner)

Bladewire 10-10-2003 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream



Are you an idiot? Obviously
You don't goto the bar till AFTER you graduate with a law degree.
I said I didn't goto law school.

if you're going to law school obviously you failed in this biz.

Good luck with law school - maybe you'll wind up as some leather chair warmer for a fortune 500 company. By 40 you may have your student loans paid off.
at least you'll be able to tell you grandkids that when you were young you posted to GFY and actually spoke to some guys that run real adult sites.

WTF is up all all the hate?

BradShaw 10-10-2003 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snuff boy
Steve reminds me of when the Hell's Angles do Santa runs at Christmas. :1orglaugh

Great analogy. I recall him "fighting" child porn in a very public manner so that everyone was sure to see he was doing it, and even saying he would block traffic from the word lolita. Go to goggle, search for lightspeed lolita, or lightspeed underage..... Wonder if his great blocking software is working?

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw



Great analogy. I recall him "fighting" child porn in a very public manner so that everyone was sure to see he was doing it, and even saying he would block traffic from the word lolita. Go to goggle, search for lightspeed lolita, or lightspeed underage..... Wonder if his great blocking software is working?

is anything sic cash promotes blocking specific key words?


other than 'honest' 'reliable' and 'trustworthy' .........

JFPdude 10-10-2003 10:19 PM

Well not that my opinion makes a difference but hey wouldn't want to be left out on this. I know Steve have worked with him, had breakfast with him, talked to him many times, and maintained his servers for him Brad on the other hand I have never met and the only thing I know about him is third party.

But with that being said I have the utmost respect for both party's. As far as I know from my customers and associates both programs convert very well. Some people like Steve way of doing things and some people like Brads way of doing things.

To the little guys like me watching all this bashing going on leaves a bad taste in my mouth. This filters down to when I am choosing a sponsor for a project. Both people can ban me from their programs personally and not lose a dime. But if either banned all my freinds I have recommended to both they would both lose money. I feel this whole thing should not be aired in the manner it is.


Brad said this ...

Steve did this ...

Grow up folks this isn't the kids playground. We have much bigger problems in this industry at hand. Acacia, Visa, and the justice department to name a few.

In reality brads comments had some merits to them. But to put that on a video and play it on a sponsors website was totally wrong. I will continue to reffer people to both programs but I will look long and hard as to the question of is it worth me sending anybody to purecash.tv as they are the people that is using this propaganda to promote thier program. Is this a good avenue to use to promote a business? Find 2 big players in the industry and lets get them to butt heads?

It goes to show who we are marketing ourselves to on these boards. Where is the business sense? More and more we are getting annoying sound wavs on banners, Banners that are really stupid like "do you think brad shaw is an asshole? well buy his content" This is all during the biggest shake up this industry has seen yet. There are a lot of eyes on this board from people outside this industry right now and this pissing contest is just another bad mark on all of us.

This issue should be put to rest. It isn't doing Steve or Brad or anybody else in this industry any justice at all.

Thats my :2 cents: if anybody really gives a shit.

Wiseman 10-10-2003 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by THE WISEMAN


I am Very good friends with Brad and Steve!!!
And I feel these arguements between the two are very much useless and good for nothing except.....

Have I mentioned? QUICKBUCK IS STILL PAYING $50 PER $2.99 TRIAL through the end of the weekend!!!


OH BTW EVERYONE!!!!!

Yngwie 10-10-2003 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff


Greg, do I still look 18? Think I could market ChatRoom Romeo to Catholic Priests?

well, even 20 year olds wear WHITE panties.. wear pj's.. have teddy bears.. So what's the difference? Girls under 18 dress in a way to make themselves look older.. So i guess this would be the same if they dressed up an 80 year old in a 15 year olds close, put teddy bears in the room and called her a schoolgirl.. lol

Now, what Lens what statinmg about on your tour where it says YOUNG SCHOOLGIRLS.. that right there is saying "we have very young girls on this site" who do you think that caters to? Podophiles... it's just like using young teens of young girls..

Now if you would have used barely legal schoolgirls at least that gives the impression that they are 18 or just turned 18.. a young schoolgirl on the other hand gives the impression that the girls are 14, 15, 16.. not 18+..

the point is there is putting teddy bears MAY give the impression that she's younger in some way.. but young schoolgirls does that in a more profound way. Im in no way taking anyones side but before you judge the way someone else does things look at things you do, things you have done.. Some sposors will not allow webmasters to use the words schoolgirls, young teens etc.. let alone YOUNG SCHOOLGIRLS. And I for one would never use those 2 words together.. And notice that you not only used young schoolgirls but innocent young schoolgirls.. very bad use of thoose three word.. Giving the impression of a 15, 16, 17 year old virgin schoolgirl.. personally I would change those words.. Since you own the sites how about checking the age of most of the members? i bet at leat 60% are 40 to 60 years old and looking for one thing... and you can guess what that is.

Yngwie

Lensman 10-10-2003 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yngwie


well, even 20 year olds wear WHITE panties.. wear pj's.. have teddy bears.. So what's the difference? Girls under 18 dress in a way to make themselves look older.. So i guess this would be the same if they dressed up an 80 year old in a 15 year olds close, put teddy bears in the room and called her a schoolgirl.. lol

Now, what Lens what statinmg about on your tour where it says YOUNG SCHOOLGIRLS.. that right there is saying "we have very young girls on this site" who do you think that caters to? Podophiles... it's just like using young teens of young girls..

Now if you would have used barely legal schoolgirls at least that gives the impression that they are 18 or just turned 18.. a young schoolgirl on the other hand gives the impression that the girls are 14, 15, 16.. not 18+..

the point is there is putting teddy bears MAY give the impression that she's younger in some way.. but young schoolgirls does that in a more profound way. Im in no way taking anyones side but before you judge the way someone else does things look at things you do, things you have done.. Some sposors will not allow webmasters to use the words schoolgirls, young teens etc.. let alone YOUNG SCHOOLGIRLS. And I for one would never use those 2 words together.. And notice that you not only used young schoolgirls but innocent young schoolgirls.. very bad use of thoose three word.. Giving the impression of a 15, 16, 17 year old virgin schoolgirl.. personally I would change those words.. Since you own the sites how about checking the age of most of the members? i bet at leat 60% are 40 to 60 years old and looking for one thing... and you can guess what that is.

Yngwie

I can't say it better. Who are we all kidding? We know what the site is supposed to appeal to.

Brad, you can't compare your site to CE Cash or anyone else, THEY are not attacking Steve Lightspeed, you are.

-=HOAX=- 10-10-2003 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gregtx



True... LS can find some great talent and they do a great job of marketing them... and I'm sure they make great $$$... and they are great guys... and they are very hospitable.... and they are great philanthropist and they throw great parties.... and Tanker makes a great impression of an otter....

BUT

Brad is still entiled to his opinon
:Graucho

You're right...he is entitledd to his opinion. But opinions aren't necessarily facts. However, the opinion that he has expressed...has made him a hypocrite..and that my friend...is a fact.

Theo 10-10-2003 10:42 PM

Conclusion. We are our own worse enemies.

JFPdude 10-10-2003 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
Conclusion. We are our own worse enemies.

Very Very True :thumbsup

BradShaw 10-10-2003 10:48 PM

Conclusion, love me, hate me, I am consistent. Been here 7 years, when some of you guys were still in diapers. Nothing will change, Brad Shaw is at the top of his game, both business wise and personally. In the end, I will laugh to the bank, while man of you are still telling stories of how mean I was to you.

SleazyDream 10-10-2003 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradShaw
Conclusion, love me, hate me, I am consistent. Been here 7 years, when some of you guys were still in diapers. Nothing will change, Brad Shaw is at the top of his game, both business wise and personally. In the end, I will laugh to the bank, while man of you are still telling stories of how mean I was to you.
Truly - I feel sorry for you.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123