Hillary to run? - GoFuckYourself.com

The Truth Hurts · 10-07-2003, 01:11 PM

Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392

Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

smack · 10-07-2003, 01:13 PM

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MrIzzz · 10-07-2003, 01:15 PM

hillary can suck on both of my nuts while i brand her forehead with my cock............to hell with her for fucking with guilliani back during the race for senate

Tala · 10-07-2003, 01:15 PM

Quick, assassinate her now and avoid the rush!

johnnycocker · 10-07-2003, 01:17 PM

what does it matter if she runs? more then likely wil not have a chance of winning, but what does it hurt?

galleryseek · 10-07-2003, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mystery Man
atleast she wouldnt run your country into the shitter like bush has done!!

bush owns the clintons.

boardersweetie · 10-07-2003, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mystery Man
atleast she wouldnt run your country into the shitter like bush has done!!

My thoughts exactly. I'd vote for her over Bush.

The Truth Hurts · 10-07-2003, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mystery Man
atleast she wouldnt run your country into the shitter like bush has done!!

Yeah, her husband already took care of that before he left office.

MrIzzz · 10-07-2003, 01:20 PM

shes a dirty bukkake loving old ass hahahaha.............i can't stand the way she handles politics. shes done nothing for ny or for the usa except make money on her book.

SuckOnThis · 10-07-2003, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tala
Quick, assassinate her now and avoid the rush!

You just committed a Federal Felony dumbass. No need to delete, a copy has already been sent to the FBI

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 01:22 PM

I will tell you this much.. love her or hate her, if she runs, she WILL represent the democratic party.

If this is true (her bid for presidency) she will give Bush more then he can handle. If this country is still in the shitter come November of next year, people will vote on the Clinton name more then anything else.

MrIzzz · 10-07-2003, 01:23 PM

GULLIANI FOR PREZZZZZZZZZZ

freeadultcontent · 10-07-2003, 01:25 PM

Plus come on, First man Mr. Clinton. I need to see this.

Face it Clinton haters, he is popular and that is why repubs still bash him every second they can.

Carrie · 10-07-2003, 01:25 PM

She's been officially registered with the Federal Election Commission to run in 2004 for years - I remember checking it right after Gore lost and her name was already there.

xxxdesign-net · 10-07-2003, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

Yeah, her husband already took care of that before he left office.

blind partisan... Thanks for the laugh!

Tala · 10-07-2003, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis

You just committed a Federal Felony dumbass. No need to delete, a copy has already been sent to the FBI

Like I'd delete that. For fuck's sake, dude, try to terrify someone who gives a fuck.

Tala · 10-07-2003, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mojo Rizin
I will tell you this much.. love her or hate her, if she runs, she WILL represent the democratic party.

If this is true (her bid for presidency) she will give Bush more then he can handle. If this country is still in the shitter come November of next year, people will vote on the Clinton name more then anything else.

And this is what bothers me. This is very true.

Keev · 10-07-2003, 01:28 PM

Fuck....

Arrrnold will terminate her

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
Plus come on, First man Mr. Clinton. I need to see this.

Face it Clinton haters, he is popular and that is why repubs still bash him every second they can.

Very Valid point...

Hillary would simply be the mouthpiece for the man behind the scenes running the show.

CraigA · 10-07-2003, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

Yeah, her husband already took care of that before he left office.

Oh really. Spending surplus, low unemployment, moderate growth in military spending.
Not quite the same today, is it?

MrIzzz · 10-07-2003, 01:28 PM

i am now going to run for president myself...............

i will gladly take donations through paypal

nothing less than $500 us please

and god bless america

wizz · 10-07-2003, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Keev
Fuck....

Arrrnold will terminate her

Phoenix · 10-07-2003, 01:30 PM

the democrats need to get back in power...fiscal responsibilty needs to be the focus....especially as the us is now committed to spending easily 2-3 trillion dollars in iraq thanks to Mr.Bush

nosey · 10-07-2003, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrIzzz
i am now going to run for president myself...............

i will gladly take donations through paypal

nothing less than $500 us please

and god bless america

MrIzzz · 10-07-2003, 01:33 PM

i will be the voice of the people

so long as we raise the presidential salary to $1000000 a year

The Truth Hurts · 10-07-2003, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CraigA

Oh really. Spending surplus, low unemployment, moderate growth in military spending.
Not quite the same today, is it?

it was a budget surplus that only existed on paper, not in reality.
unemployment figures will vary based on what set of numbers benefit you on any given day.
growth in military spending, yeah, to make up for all the cuts he'd made earlier.

The Truth Hurts · 10-07-2003, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

blind partisan... Thanks for the laugh!

Said it before... I've never voted for a Republican

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

it was a budget surplus that only existed on paper, not in reality.
unemployment figures will vary based on what set of numbers you benefit you on any given day.
growth in military spending, yeah, to make up for all the cuts he'd made earlier.

The 2nd largest deficit in this nations history shouldnt be of any concern because its "only on paper"

The Truth Hurts · 10-07-2003, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mojo Rizin

The 2nd largest deficit in this nations history shouldnt be of any concern because its "only on paper"

read what I was replying to.

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

read what I was replying to.

I did, and the point remains

rooster · 10-07-2003, 01:47 PM

that the clintons would be popular with anyone shows how big of sheep people are.

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
that the clintons would be popular with anyone shows how big of sheep people are.

Why because they have a past involving controversy?

Name me a presidency that hasnt..

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

Yeah, her husband already took care of that before he left office.

Oh yeah! This country is SOOOOOOO much better now under Bush than Clinton. Our economy is better, our foreign policy has us more secure with no loss of lives or troops.
Our environment is just that much more clean.
Jobs are abundant.
Everyone has medical care!
The war on drugs has been won!
The war on porno will be won!

What a rigid rightist you are to make grand comments that aren't even close to the truth!

ESPECIALLY the whole notion that Hillary is going to run in '04.
She isn't you idiot child!

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
She's been officially registered with the Federal Election Commission to run in 2004 for years - I remember checking it right after Gore lost and her name was already there.

Anyone can put someone's name on that list! DOH!

rooster · 10-07-2003, 02:00 PM

If I was a democrat, I would just want someone better than a very far left hag.

I just get sick of people on the left that try to pass them off as angels. Like the constant "all bill did was get a blowjob". yea sure, thats the only bad thing he ever did in his life

Why is it that pretty much every close friend of the clintons is either in prison or in hot water of some kind.

Oh thats right, its the far right conspiracy theory that Hillary likes to talk about.

If a democrat were to win, it needs to be someone more moderate and without so much baggage. There would be nothing but gridlock and scandals if she got in. A total waste of time.

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

Oh yeah! This country is SOOOOOOO much better now under Bush than Clinton. Our economy is better, our foreign policy has us more secure with no loss of lives or troops.
Our environment is just that much more clean.
Jobs are abundant.
Everyone has medical care!
The war on drugs has been won!
The war on porno will be won!

What a rigid rightist you are to make grand comments that aren't even close to the truth!

ESPECIALLY the whole notion that Hillary is going to run in '04.
She isn't you idiot child!

Has she totally ruled out the idea?

I knew at one time she said she would wait till 2008, but I think that was before Gore officially made his announcement.

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

it was a budget surplus that only existed on paper, not in reality.
unemployment figures will vary based on what set of numbers benefit you on any given day.
growth in military spending, yeah, to make up for all the cuts he'd made earlier.

You do SO live in the "un-real world"!
I'm sure you're now going to tell us that the U.S. deficit is on "paper" only?

DUDE...of course it's on paper..it's called the "NATIONAL LEDGER" that is used to calculate the budget!

Hey everyone..following TTH's advice..ANY debts you have are just on paper..so they aren't real! You don't have to pay them! Aren't you LUCKY!?

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
that the clintons would be popular with anyone shows how big of sheep people are.

And anyone that likes Bush shows what PIGS they are!

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

You do SO live in the "un-real world"!
I'm sure you're now going to tell us that the U.S. deficit is on "paper" only?

DUDE...of course it's own paper..it's called the "NATIONAL LEDGER" that is used to calculate the budget!

Hey everyone..following TTH's advice..ANY debts you have are just on paper..so they aren't real! You don't have to pay them! Aren't you LUCKY!?

Form your own arguements

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mojo Rizin

Has she totally ruled out the idea?

I knew at one time she said she would wait till 2008, but I think that was before Gore officially made his announcement.

She's not running..except for the rightist quacks on gfy and radio/tv who say that...any RESPONSIBLE person in politics will tell you she ain't running.

That's the whole stink about Wesley Clark. A lot think the Clinton's talked him into running to fuck up the democrats (like they NEED help) so Bush will win, and then Hillary can run in 2008.

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mojo Rizin

Form your own arguements

I just did! Where's yours?

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

She's not running..except for the rightist quacks on gfy and radio/tv who say that...any RESPONSIBLE person in politics will tell you she ain't running.

That's the whole stink about Wesley Clark. A lot think the Clinton's talked him into running to fuck up the democrats (like they NEED help) so Bush will win, and then Hillary can run in 2008.

That doesnt make any damn sense..

They are in desperate need of someone to represent the party.. She right NOW is prime for the taking.

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

I just did! Where's yours?

read up.. I already used that

Nas7782 · 10-07-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392

Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

Hilary should not enter the race. She'll only divide the party. Some Dems dislike her as much as the Republican. Repubs. should be very happy if she enters, since most of the Dem grassroots do not like her.

rooster · 10-07-2003, 02:14 PM

the problem in this country is it has become way too partisan with so much spin.

Its just a difference of philosophy.

The democrats raise taxes and start a bunch of ineficient socialistic programs. Cut military fbi cia, create a bunch of low paying jobs, and take a total hands off policy to foreign policy.

For Clinton, that worked for his popularity because we were in the internet boom and making big money. But it was all a mirage. All the worldcom etc were going on at the end of his presidency, the internet boom bombed because it was built on garbage business plans, and guys like bin laden were ignored because he didnt want to do anything that could possibly reduce his popularity.

I think the best way to describe that 8 years was ignorance. Going through life with blinders on.

I personally dont agree with that philosophy. Although republicans arent perfect, I for the most part agree with what they do and feel safer in the fact that they arent afraid to do something for fear of polls.

xxxdesign-net · 10-07-2003, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

Said it before... I've never voted for a Republican

trying to get some credibility here?

You republicans make me laugh...

You have mentionned more than one time you were a republican... If you havent vote republican... its because you dont even vote...

Centurion · 10-07-2003, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster

The democrats raise taxes and start a bunch of ineficient socialistic programs. Cut military fbi cia, create a bunch of low paying jobs, and take a total hands off policy to foreign policy.

Ok..I'm going to call you on that. Instead of your usual pontificating, please give SPECIFICS to you above "arguments".
Anyone can spout general nonsence like that!

Back it up now with some proof please!
Please show where they cut the military, fbi, cia. Would love to see your facts on that one!

What is a low paying job? $10.00 an hour? How many low paying jobs were created in the 8 years Clinton was Pres?

Raised taxes? Which ones..how much?
Give a list of the "socialistic programs" that were started and why they were "ineficient".

Waiting for your answers!

xxxdesign-net · 10-07-2003, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
the problem in this country is it has become way too partisan with so much spin.

Its just a difference of philosophy.

The democrats raise taxes and start a bunch of ineficient socialistic programs. Cut military fbi cia, create a bunch of low paying jobs, and take a total hands off policy to foreign policy.

ofcourse rebuplicans economic experts are better and then the democrate ones!

You have it all figured out

Probono · 10-07-2003, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Presented by the Federal Election Commission
CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392

Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2004
State: Presidential Candidate
District: 03
Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

Link please

according to CNN

"Clinton has ruled out a run for the White House in 2004 and has said she has no intention of launching a presidential campaign for 2008. Many Republicans, however, believe she is interested in running for president, and her political ambitions are the subject of much commentary."

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLIT...llary.clinton/

Mojo Rizin · 10-07-2003, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Probono

Link please

according to CNN

"Clinton has ruled out a run for the White House in 2004 and has said she has no intention of launching a presidential campaign for 2008. Many Republicans, however, believe she is interested in running for president, and her political ambitions are the subject of much commentary."

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLIT...llary.clinton/

Interesting

10-07-2003, 01:11 PM	#1
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,305	Hillary to run? Presented by the Federal Election Commission CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM ID: P00003392 Office Sought: President Election Year: 2004 State: Presidential Candidate District: 03 Party: DEM (Democratic Party)

10-07-2003, 01:13 PM	#2
smack Push Porn Like Weight. Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Inside .NET Posts: 10,652	NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! __________________ Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

10-07-2003, 01:15 PM	#3
MrIzzz If u touch it, I will cum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: long island Posts: 22,923	hillary can suck on both of my nuts while i brand her forehead with my cock............to hell with her for fucking with guilliani back during the race for senate __________________ WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?

10-07-2003, 01:15 PM	#4
Tala Fucked if I know Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Do you have a flag? Posts: 23,368	Quick, assassinate her now and avoid the rush! __________________ ICQ: 11120676 \| Google: mindcrime \| Skype: suitemindcrime\|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com\|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!\|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.

10-07-2003, 01:17 PM	#5
johnnycocker Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 122	what does it matter if she runs? more then likely wil not have a chance of winning, but what does it hurt? __________________ quality email lists for sale, or let us mail for you at $175.00 per mil delivered, contact me at [email protected] or ICQ #260963762

10-07-2003, 01:20 PM	#9
MrIzzz If u touch it, I will cum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: long island Posts: 22,923	shes a dirty bukkake loving old ass hahahaha.............i can't stand the way she handles politics. shes done nothing for ny or for the usa except make money on her book. __________________ WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?

10-07-2003, 01:22 PM	#11
Mojo Rizin Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Chandler, AZ Posts: 1,089	I will tell you this much.. love her or hate her, if she runs, she WILL represent the democratic party. If this is true (her bid for presidency) she will give Bush more then he can handle. If this country is still in the shitter come November of next year, people will vote on the Clinton name more then anything else. __________________ Start Making Reel Profits Today! VOIP Technology Is NOW

10-07-2003, 01:23 PM	#12
MrIzzz If u touch it, I will cum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: long island Posts: 22,923	GULLIANI FOR PREZZZZZZZZZZ __________________ WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?

10-07-2003, 01:25 PM	#13
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	Plus come on, First man Mr. Clinton. I need to see this. Face it Clinton haters, he is popular and that is why repubs still bash him every second they can. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

10-07-2003, 01:25 PM	#14
Carrie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Virgin - nee Posts: 3,162	She's been officially registered with the Federal Election Commission to run in 2004 for years - I remember checking it right after Gore lost and her name was already there.

10-07-2003, 01:28 PM	#18
Keev Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 5,335	Fuck.... Arrrnold will terminate her __________________ ReliableServers.com - NO REF LINK!

10-07-2003, 01:30 PM	#23
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	the democrats need to get back in power...fiscal responsibilty needs to be the focus....especially as the us is now committed to spending easily 2-3 trillion dollars in iraq thanks to Mr.Bush __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

10-07-2003, 01:33 PM	#25
MrIzzz If u touch it, I will cum Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: long island Posts: 22,923	i will be the voice of the people so long as we raise the presidential salary to $1000000 a year __________________ WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?

10-07-2003, 01:47 PM	#31
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	that the clintons would be popular with anyone shows how big of sheep people are.

10-07-2003, 02:00 PM	#35
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	If I was a democrat, I would just want someone better than a very far left hag. I just get sick of people on the left that try to pass them off as angels. Like the constant "all bill did was get a blowjob". yea sure, thats the only bad thing he ever did in his life Why is it that pretty much every close friend of the clintons is either in prison or in hot water of some kind. Oh thats right, its the far right conspiracy theory that Hillary likes to talk about. If a democrat were to win, it needs to be someone more moderate and without so much baggage. There would be nothing but gridlock and scandals if she got in. A total waste of time.

10-07-2003, 02:14 PM	#45
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	the problem in this country is it has become way too partisan with so much spin. Its just a difference of philosophy. The democrats raise taxes and start a bunch of ineficient socialistic programs. Cut military fbi cia, create a bunch of low paying jobs, and take a total hands off policy to foreign policy. For Clinton, that worked for his popularity because we were in the internet boom and making big money. But it was all a mirage. All the worldcom etc were going on at the end of his presidency, the internet boom bombed because it was built on garbage business plans, and guys like bin laden were ignored because he didnt want to do anything that could possibly reduce his popularity. I think the best way to describe that 8 years was ignorance. Going through life with blinders on. I personally dont agree with that philosophy. Although republicans arent perfect, I for the most part agree with what they do and feel safer in the fact that they arent afraid to do something for fear of polls.