That's just incredible. Someone who believes politicians.

Oh well, I guess there's one born every minute.

he thinks she goes too far by calling treason treason. I don't.
McCarthy was a hero. You have no idea how many government spies were in our government during the cold war.

how cute. again, you have no facts, no ideas, just your cute little liberal slogans.
good luck with life dopey.:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Coulter is a head case. Right and left wingers agree on this.

Saying the things she does, in any other time in history she'd probably be committed.

But instead, Fox put her on TV.

The end doesn't justify the means.

keep toeing the liberal party line, you'll convert us, I swear.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

you don't even know the means. the movie you got your "facts" from is wrong.

You admitted you believe everything that comes out of a politician's mouth.

That truly is shocking.

Talk about gullible.

Oh well.

I have plenty of examples. But you'll have a standard answer for each one I'm sure.

Like for example:

This war was based on the threat of WMD's. None have been found.

Was Bush lying, badly informed, or has Saddam hidden them all up his sleeve?

Can you give a straight answer to a straight question? I'd be interested to find out. I'm not holding my breath.

I've no interest in "converting" anyone. Just wondering if you can be at all pragmatic.

I know you believe what you say. But I'd like to see if you actually have any facts to back up your beliefs, or are you so blinded by idiology?

A woman named Coulter cried "Treason."
She did it without any reason.
Though we know that she lied,
'Twas perhaps justified:
On her brain, I'm afraid, there's a lesion.

CHAPTER 3/ You Know Who I Don't Like? Ann Coulter - from 'Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them' by Al Franken

:Graucho

He had 10 years to hide them up his sleeve.

here's a link to PBS, you know, that bastion of right wing lies.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/front.../defectors.html
to quote:
n 1995, Saddam Hussein actually appeared to be winning in his strategy of cheat and retreat. He had actually managed to hide so many of his weapons that many of the U.N. weapons inspectors thought that he had turned over most of them, and were prepared to make that kind of recommendation. And it was only on the defection of his son-in-law and cousin [Kamel] that the international community realized how much he really still had. The whole crisis actually might have ended at that point, if it hadn't been for that very ... defection. ...

so, if not because of *ONE* bit of luck (saddam's son in law's defection) the UN and the hey, saddam is really a good guy" europeans would have given iraq a clean bill of health about WMDs only to be fooled again


got any other lies, fool?
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You sound like Death in Monty Python's the meaning of life.

I love people who take their political guide from a failed comedian.

It's common knowledge he HAD WMD's.

The Iraq war was to get rid of the threat of them NOW.

That was the basis for the quick march to war.

No WMD's have yet to be found.

Maybe he did have WMD's but he would have had to hide them fucking well.

And if they're so well hidden, could they really have been deployed in 45 minutes?

The whole point is: this war was waged against "the threat of WMD's"

None have been found.

I'm sure Bush and Co had their reasons to go to war, but the evidence points towards the threat of WMD's not being a credible one.

So was he lying, or just badly informed?

failed. hmmm. let's see: original writer for saturday night live. performer on same show. fairly successful box office on movie starring himself as character from saturday night live. now author of TWO NYT bestselling books...failed.

ahhhh, so its ok for saddam to *have* WMD's as long as he doesn't wave them around.
silly liberal.

also, saddam hussien hasn't been found yet either. does that mean he never existed?
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

face it, if your president isn't getting blow jobs from ugly chicks, you just can't identify with him

Actually, what I said was he USED to have WMD's. We know that.

The UN largely disarmed him.

Maybe he had some left over. Do we know for sure? No. Because no one can find them.

So in your eyes, was there a credible threat from WMD's? Why when none have been found?

If there was, are you saying that the US and UK armies are so incompetant that 100,000+ soldiers can't find them?

former. very former.
10 years ago? you and I have a different idea of success.
were they joke books? I didn't know.

but hey, I'll conceed your point.

I love people who take their political guide from a comedian :1orglaugh

then you *do* believe there was no such thing as saddam hussien!
The UN saw him before the war too but now he's gone. I guess he, like the WMDs, don't exist.

Two spurious arguments in an otherwise possibly interesting conversation.

Stay on subject 12clicks. Prove to us you're more than emoticons and tired insults.

oh, to live in such a simple world.:thumbsup

political satirists, and humorists have been around for centuries, and I'm sure there are a few you've enjoyed...what's your point?

Which syllable of the word "disarmed" do you not understand?

Well?

answer the question einstien. do you believe saddam exists even though we haven't found him yet?

he only had about a month to hide but had 10 years to hide his WMDs.

You're a disappointment.

You can trade insults, but not much more.

I'm sure you have a link proving your disarmed *theory*

you can't just prattle on pretending your statements are facts.:1orglaugh

well, i'm glad you love me. i love you too even though you're an asshole. :winkwink:

ahhhh, when corned to proved facts or show reason, you resort to name calling.
typical liberal.:1orglaugh

I'm only an asshole to the wrong. :winkwink:

I wonder if you see the irony in this post.

well, I gotta go grill some stakes.
I'll pick this up later.

Do you actually keep up with the news?

After Iraq War I, the country was crawling with weapons inspectors with positive results.

I never said he was fully disarmed.

But again I ask - where are these weapons we invaded for?

Just answer me that one simple question. You probably won't.

ahh. then i'm safe! :thumbsup

yes, I see you making a statement you can't back up about disarming saddam and using a double standard about not finding WMDs or saddam and then going into name calling.

When I call you an idiot, I back it up with proof.:1orglaugh

Now while I'm away you can either run away or you can go get some facts on this fantom disarming of saddam
lets see what you do.:1orglaugh

ahhh, backpeddle!

hidden as is saddam. if this is your best comeback, don't bother.
you're a joke.
when I return, I'll post all of hans blixes statements about WMDs that have not been accounted for. (there, you have plenty of time for a rebuttle)

kids these days asre so easy.

see you later. dinner's calling.

go rent the movie amp, its a pretty good flick

As I already said, you're able to trade insults, but little of any substance.

I understand your political mentally exactly. You're pretty much a cliche. You're an extremist, who believes his president always speaks the truth, and thinks Coulter is an authority on anything.

Funny, funny, shit.

And you keep deflecting, and not actually answering a simple question -

Where are the WMD's we went to war over?

That's it.

We went to war because "There was a threat from WMD's"

NONE have been found.

That's it.

You can try to deflect this point or avoid the issue, but that is a fact.

You were duped.

And you don't seem to mind.

You'll retort to this with another lame comback. Or some facts you believe are related.

But you won't actually answer the question.

And that greatly makes me doubt the efficacy of your judgement.

If you can't see you were led into a war over false pretenses, then who am I to care?

Your obvious ignorance and naivity gives me plenty of entertainment.

Not sure why you waste so much energy on this sick fuck. He is in some serious need of professional help but he'll never get it because in his mind all shrinks are liberals. His ability to survive this long with a severe mental handicap is a marvel of nature.

It is not proven that WMD's don't exist. So they must exist. Guilty until proven otherwise.