GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Visa Bans Public Nudidty Transaction

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Visa Bans Public Nudidty Transaction (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=177739)

Even though this doesn't affect me, it's interesting... bump

all in the wake of the ggw fiasco. something needs to be done.

Where are all the payment processors replies :ticking

Quote:

Originally posted by Stud Money
Where are all the payment processors replies :ticking

Three parties this weekend. LA, Montreal and NY.

The rest don't post on weekends.

Quote:

Originally posted by Dravyk
Three parties this weekend. LA, Montreal and NY.

The rest don't post on weekends.

Ah thatll be why then thanks Drav :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips

You know Igor?

Only via email. Chatted with him years ago when we were toying with doing a toon for his site. He seems to be a smart guy who knows what he wants. I'm sure this VISA thing will roll off his back.

Quote:

Originally posted by EscortBiz
ytou are right, like i said they are talking about requiring every paysite to have 50% of the members area exclusive stuff or they wont allow billing, makes no sense but thats whats in the works

Not only does it not make sense, it is neither something I've heard, nor something that could be enforced...

Public nudity rox :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally posted by Stud Money

Was actually posted on another forum by one of the PSW Billing sales people.

Dang..they're STILL in biz?

Quote:

Originally posted by goBigtime

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by KRL
Well if that is the case, about no user submitted sexual pics in a members area, AdultFriendFinder is going to have some major problems with their 10 Million members who mostly all use sex pics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And/or ifriends.

I don't get it.
What's the problem with iFriends in this?

Quote:

Originally posted by gornyhuy
I wouldn't be surprised if Igor just pixelates or blacks out the genitals on his free voyeurweb pages and forces everyone to go to RedClouds to get any actual nudity. I would be willing to bet his sales would skyrocket.

"In addition, no membership sites may contain user/member submitted pictures either via a picture post or message board that contains nudity or sexually explicit depictions."

Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't say anything about it being wrong in the free area and ok in the pay area. So I don't think that method would work for VW. Too bad, though.

However, the wording does make me wonder exactly what's acceptable and what's not. Let's say that VW keeps accepting user submitted pics in the free area, to bring in the traffic... But converts RedClouds to 100% licensed content. (or licensed, plus any members who actually submitted a model release and ID, etc...) Would that be acceptable? Is the wording implying that only the actual members area is under this scrutiny? Or would there still be a problem because user submitted pics appear in the free area?

Also, the wording specifically says: "either via a picture post or message board". Both of these imply (to me) allowing the user to upload their own pics without approval first. What if VW views and approves all pics first, and thus is not an "automated" picture post or message board. Would that make a difference I wonder?

Quote:

Originally posted by MarcoTC

I don't get it.
What's the problem with iFriends in this?

Yeah I don't see how this would effect iFriends, seeing that they have full documentation on hand for every single performer on their site (copies of ID's, signed contracts, age documentation sessions).

Cassie