Patriot Act: Slippery slop has begun... - GoFuckYourself.com

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 02:40 PM

http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/14...tid=123&tid=99

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid...&cat=terrorism

"New Terror Laws Used Against Common Criminals"

And I think that answers Pathfinder's question...

directfiesta · 09-14-2003, 02:50 PM

No surprise. He is a ... piece of shit.

FROM ANOTHER ARTICLE:

Quote:

But in a plan announced this week to expand counterterrorism powers, President Bush adopted a very different tack. In a three-point presidential plan that critics are already dubbing Patriot Act II, Mr. Bush is seeking broad new authority to allow federal agents without the approval of a judge or even a federal prosecutor to demand private records and compel testimony

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...stoprivatedata

Fletch XXX · 09-14-2003, 02:54 PM

'...Federal Government Overlords....

Oh wait, we've had them since 1776. DOH!!'

rossiya2 · 09-14-2003, 03:05 PM

Most lawmakers admit that they never read the bill before voting on it. Put simply, from October 23 to October 26, a massive piece of legislation was rammed through both the House of Representatives and Senate, without public hearings of any sort. The USA Patriot Act was sold as the legal measures required to prevent future terroristic attacks on U.S. soil. In the wake of the September 11, 2001 Massacre, the American people were gripped in fear. Any and all measures of self-protection seemed desirable. But in the hysteria, the people of this country allowed its President, aided and abetted by both houses of the federal legislature, to essentially violate the U.S. Constitution and, in turn, strip away the basic civil liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights. This was done in the name of "national security".

The USA Patriot Act (PA) is composed of many laws already on the books that are designed to counter terrorism in the U.S. What distinguishes the Patriot Act from these pre-September 11 laws is its ENABLING characteristics. Put simply, the criminal statutes, investigative rules and court procedures which safeguarded our constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties in previous anti-terror legislation were stripped away. They have been replaced by a system Executive Branch fiat, now institutionalized in the department of Homeland Security. How did the USA Patriot Act accomplish this feat?

The USA Patriot Act effectively eliminated:

FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious labor, and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records requests.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.

RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.

FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' personal records, business documents and telephone/internet activity without probable cause to assist terror investigation.

RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront the witnesses against them.

While many Americans were led by the Bush administration to believe that the Patriot Act was solely directed at foreign nationals in the U.S. who may pose a military threat to citizens and property (specifically people of Southwest Asian and North African descent--a vulgarian version of racial profiling), it swiftly emerged that the actual day-to-day targets of the Patriot Act were U.S. citizens and legal aliens. Overwhelmingly, they have suffered the abuses of federal police policies which have led to public humiliation, invasion of personal privacy, intimidation, movement control and monitoring, capricious arrest and detention, and denial of legal remedy in the court system.

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 03:09 PM

This makes me quite scared, and indeed ashamed, to be headed back to my Homeland. I hope my vote can do something to help undo this. A patriot is someone who makes their country the place it should be, not someone who lets the government do anything.

Rorschach · 09-14-2003, 03:11 PM

It was only a matter of time...

The whole "chemical weapons" thing would be great comedy if it didn't involve some dumb tweaker getting locked up for life.

Mr.Fiction · 09-14-2003, 03:16 PM

Bush's Justice Department is using unconstitutional anti-terror laws against gamblers and drug users, who have nothing to do with terror.

I thought right wingers wanted "less government"?

ThunderBalls · 09-14-2003, 03:18 PM

goBigtime · 09-14-2003, 03:20 PM

Can the Patriot Act be removed with another president or vote or something?

Honeyslut · 09-14-2003, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
'...Federal Government Overlords....

Oh wait, we've had them since 1776. DOH!!'

hehehe...

I am clicking on your link....

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rossiya2

The USA Patriot Act effectively eliminated:

FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious labor, and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records requests.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.

RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.

FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' personal records, business documents and telephone/internet activity without probable cause to assist terror investigation.

RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront the witnesses against them.

Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?

Rare injustices in the system have ALWAYS existed. It's not often that you hear about your normal, middle class, by all association "innocent" neighbor being hauled off to jail and awaiting an indefinite court date... if they didn't do something suspicious or that breaks the law.

You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?

Rare injustices in the system have ALWAYS existed. It's not often that you hear about your normal, middle class, by all association "innocent" neighbor being hauled off to jail and awaiting an indefinite court date... if they didn't do something suspicious or that breaks the law.

You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.

Were you dropped on your head when you were a child?

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

Were you dropped on your head when you were a child?

I'm not sure how to answer such an intelligent question

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

I'm not sure how to answer such an intelligent question

Let me point out your stupidity then.

Imagine someone getting busted for speeding.
Now imagine that person getting sentenced for armed robbery for the speeding thing because of some weird little loophole in the law.
Now, imagine some dumb fuck saying "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" about the whole thing.

That dumb fuck is you.

Now, if you were dropped on your head as a child, at least you'd have an excuse.

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?

Rare injustices in the system have ALWAYS existed. It's not often that you hear about your normal, middle class, by all association "innocent" neighbor being hauled off to jail and awaiting an indefinite court date... if they didn't do something suspicious or that breaks the law.

You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.

For a justice system to have any justice in it at all, it must treat everyone the same. The assumption has to be that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. This law allows the assumption of certain kinds of guilt to change the process, such that a fair defense is not possible. This affects all of us, because it could affect any one of us.

VirtuMike · 09-14-2003, 04:29 PM

I forget - what was the difference between the FBI and KGB?

pornguy · 09-14-2003, 04:31 PM

Well if anyone of you want to know if any of this shit is true, let me tell you first hand that it is..

In 1999 my wife was accused of a felony, and due to the fact that our attorneys caught the officers in the case lying, and refusing to take evidence that would hurt the states case,and the assistant state attorney did nothing about it, we decided not to risk what they may have written in the reports. They offered that if she woulf help them in a case, they would offer her probation instead of 5 years. So she took the probation. 340 days.

Now my wife is from Cuba and holds a green card. She has been here for over 10 years.. Well she served her time for what she was accused of.

On the 28th of August 2003, INS came to our house at 6am and took her into custody. She has been sitting in jail since then waiting to see a judge. They took her from here (m Gainesville ) to a county jail 200 miles north of here and told her that she would then be sent to Orlando. They told her that she would only be there 4 days. 14 days later they transported her to Orlande, where she spent one night, and then they moved her to Miami. She has been there for 3 days now, and we think that she may see a judge, by the 30th. We have been told by out attorney that most likely she will do another 90days, because she plead guilty. And then there is a CHANCE that she will be let go. But there have been and still are some cubans that are being held, with no chance to be released until cuba is free. Those people that are being held have already served their sentence. .

This is a sad day in america. Now it looks like the only way that I can get her out is to find another country that will allow the US to deport her there. Which means that I an american citizen by birth am being forced out of the US!

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

Let me point out your stupidity then.

Imagine someone getting busted for speeding.
Now imagine that person getting sentenced for armed robbery for the speeding thing because of some weird little loophole in the law.
Now, imagine some dumb fuck saying "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" about the whole thing.

That dumb fuck is you.

Now, if you were dropped on your head as a child, at least you'd have an excuse.

Let me point out your ignorance.

Things like this have already happened, before the Patriot Act. How many people were sentenced to death for murders they didn't commit? What about 50 or 60 years ago, a black man in the south being sentenced to life, for what most would consider to be, petite larceny?

I have heard a lot of cases, where judges and juries have given harsh sentences for minor crimes. I remember one story on Court TV and Dateline once, about a jury that aquitted a young boy and girl for murdering their abusive grandfather, but convicted the boy of a younger charged of armed robbery for taking the few hundred dollars the grandfather had on him, when he was killed. So the judge turned around and gave the guy life in prison for the robbery. Is that fair? You decide. This happened long before 9/11 and the Patriot Act.

Like I said, rare injustices in the system have always existed. I guess you weren't aware of them before or just want something to bitch about now...?

But I am just a dumb fuck... what do I know?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-14-2003, 04:37 PM

"Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?"

Yes.

Talking shit about the leadership can now lead to your arrest and the seizure of your assets. We used to have the right to speak out but the muzzle is comming on.

Organise a protest and you will be labled something so an invistigation can be made on you. That sound like freedom?

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Let me point out your ignorance.

Things like this have already happened, before the Patriot Act. How many people were sentenced to death for murders they didn't commit? What about 50 or 60 years ago, a black man in the south being sentenced to life, for what most would consider to be, petite larceny?

I have heard a lot of cases, where judges and juries have given harsh sentences for minor crimes. I remember one story on Court TV and Dateline once, about a jury that aquitted a young boy and girl for murdering their abusive grandfather, but convicted the boy of a younger charged of armed robbery for taking the few hundred dollars the grandfather had on him, when he was killed. So the judge turned around and gave the guy life in prison for the robbery. Is that fair? You decide. This happened long before 9/11 and the Patriot Act.

Like I said, rare injustices in the system have always existed. I guess you weren't aware of them before or just want something to bitch about now...?

But I am just a dumb fuck... what do I know?

Ehm... what the fuck does that lengthy post have to do with you saying "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." about this?

You are attacking something I didn't say a word about... you're a dumb fuck indeed

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by VirtuMike
I forget - what was the difference between the FBI and KGB?

The FBI still exists.

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Things like this have already happened, before the Patriot Act. How many people were sentenced to death for murders they didn't commit? What about 50 or 60 years ago, a black man in the south being sentenced to life, for what most would consider to be, petite larceny?

(snip)

Like I said, rare injustices in the system have always existed. I guess you weren't aware of them before or just want something to bitch about now...?

The fact that bad things have happened before does not make them okay when they happen now. That's a horrible principle.

Also, I think this goes a lot further than the stuff you are talking about. This is more insidious. Laws are being passed that take away freedoms. The whole system is being changed, and it's getting worse. What makes it worse is that it is all being done in the name of a patriotic war against terror.

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

Ehm... what the fuck does that lengthy post have to do with you saying "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." about this?

You are attacking something I didn't say a word about... you're a dumb fuck indeed

Ummm... my post had nothing to do with "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." .... It had to do with YOU giving an example of an unfair sentence for speeding. I replied with other examples of how this has already been happening for decades.

I never said it was right that these things happen then or now.

You are the dumb fuck that doesn't even remember what you said in your own post.

ThunderBalls · 09-14-2003, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?

I guess in your mind the boats not sinking until YOUR feet are wet.

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb

The fact that bad things have happened before does not make them okay when they happen now. That's a horrible principle.

Also, I think this goes a lot further than the stuff you are talking about. This is more insidious. Laws are being passed that take away freedoms. The whole system is being changed, and it's getting worse. What makes it worse is that it is all being done in the name of a patriotic war against terror.

What I find frightening is the possible scale of this. This being used routinely in regular lawsuits and such could be a great threat to freedom. If it holds up in court, it could mean the end of quite a few constitutional rights.

brand0n · 09-14-2003, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rorschach
It was only a matter of time...

The whole "chemical weapons" thing would be great comedy if it didn't involve some dumb tweaker getting locked up for life.

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Ummm... my post had nothing to do with "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." .... It had to do with YOU giving an example of an unfair sentence for speeding. I replied with other examples of how this has already been happening for decades.

I never said it was right that these things happen then or now.

You are the dumb fuck that doesn't even remember what you said in your own post.

You literally said "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.". Really, just scroll up.

In your original post, you said you thought this wouldn't be dangerous for "everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens". After that, you made the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." remark.

My example shows how ridiculous the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." remark is in this case. The fact that that has been happening for decades has nothing whatsoever to do with that. And, the remark would've been ridiculous in any of those examples you gave as well.

So, what was your point exactly with the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time" thing?

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

You literally said "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.". Really, just scroll up.

In your original post, you said you thought this wouldn't be dangerous for "everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens". After that, you made the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." remark.

My example shows how ridiculous the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time." remark is in this case. The fact that that has been happening for decades has nothing whatsoever to do with that. And, the remark would've been ridiculous in any of those examples you gave as well.

So, what was your point exactly with the "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time" thing?

Yes I know I said that, but my previous post didn't pertain to my comment about that. My previous post was just an example of how inappropriate sentences have already been happening.

My point with "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time" is simply don't deliberately put yourself in a position, that the consequences could ultimately be more than you are willing to face.

The new laws, are for extreme cases. Your speeding with armed robbery sentence for a loophole, could have already happened long before these new laws againgst terrorism came about. Ever hear of racial profiling? I just don't see extreme things like you said, happening on a regular basis, to ordinary people, that aren't affiliate with any type of major crime. This country is too civilized and advanced for that to float. Like I said, it ALREADY DOES happen though and that's what the system is for. There's countless people already in prison, appealing their convictions. This is nothing new, to me at least. I've read and seen so many cases of unfair treatment and abuse of loopholes, I completely understand what you are saying, but I am also saying, as a whole, this will not be much different than rare instances that already occur.

When I actually feel my freedoms have been taken away, then I will say "Ok I was wrong"... but as of now, it doesn't effect me and I don't plan on organizing any protests anytime soon, so I am STILL grateful for all the freedoms I utilize everyday.

People are quick to point out the rare instances of injustice when it comes to a harsh sentence, but how many people commit felonies and get away with a slap on the wrist? Murderers and rapists serving less time than people writing bad checks etc. There are unfair loopholes that go both ways.

directfiesta · 09-14-2003, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Bunch of horseshit.

If I fucked you up the ass with my big hard dick, would you still say that there is nothing up your poop shoot???? just by denial of getting butt fucked?

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

If I fucked you up the ass with my big hard dick, would you still say that there is nothing up your poop shoot???? just by denial of getting butt fucked?

huh?

Do you even live in the US?

USA Is Doomed · 09-14-2003, 05:34 PM

All we need now is Colin pointing to a few statistics (usually Government statistics ;-) that reveal that everything is actually 'a okay and always will be'.

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

I guess in your mind the boats not sinking until YOUR feet are wet.

Very well said.

directfiesta · 09-14-2003, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

huh?

Do you even live in the US?

Yes, 5 months out of 12. US corp, US taxes ( probably more in a year than you in a lifetime), US bank accounts and I love the americans. I do despise their actual administration.

But you seem to need help onn the question: Do you fucking feel it??? Yes or no ?

Analogy: you are getting ass fucked by your gov and you are in constant denial in ALL threads... Or maybe you like getting butt fucked.....

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Yes I know I said that, but my previous post didn't pertain to my comment about that. My previous post was just an example of how inappropriate sentences have already been happening.

My point with "You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time" is simply don't deliberately put yourself in a position, that the consequences could ultimately be more than you are willing to face.

The new laws, are for extreme cases. Your speeding with armed robbery sentence for a loophole, could have already happened long before these new laws againgst terrorism came about. Ever hear of racial profiling? I just don't see extreme things like you said, happening on a regular basis, to ordinary people, that aren't affiliate with any type of major crime. This country is too civilized and advanced for that to float. Like I said, it ALREADY DOES happen though and that's what the system is for. There's countless people already in prison, appealing their convictions. This is nothing new, to me at least. I've read and seen so many cases of unfair treatment and abuse of loopholes, I completely understand what you are saying, but I am also saying, as a whole, this will not be much different than rare instances that already occur.

When I actually feel my freedoms have been taken away, then I will say "Ok I was wrong"... but as of now, it doesn't effect me and I don't plan on organizing any protests anytime soon, so I am STILL grateful for all the freedoms I utilize everyday.

People are quick to point out the rare instances of injustice when it comes to a harsh sentence, but how many people commit felonies and get away with a slap on the wrist? Murderers and rapists serving less time than people writing bad checks etc. There are unfair loopholes that go both ways.

Yes, it has happened in the past, and probably will continue to happen in the future. That doesn't mean much though... murders, racism, child molestation, rape - all have happened and will probably continue to happen in the future. That doesn't mean people shouldn't care about it or shouldn't fight it.

"Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" becomes a very odd expression if you also use it for random, unjust sentences. Makes it sound like you support random, unjust sentences.

As for the "It doesn't affect me, so I won't protest" thing:

Quote:

When they came for the Communists, I did not stand up,
because I was not a Communist.
When they came for the Jews, I did not stand up,
because I was not a Jew.
When they came for the Catholics, I did not stand up,
because I was a Protestant.
When they came for me, there was no one left to stand up.
- Martin Niemoller

smack · 09-14-2003, 05:41 PM

i just got my telescreen today. came ups priority. ashahahahaha says it's gotta be installed in the wall next week. and i got a letter from the ministry of love too..... this doesn't look good.

noshit · 09-14-2003, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?

Rare injustices in the system have ALWAYS existed. It's not often that you hear about your normal, middle class, by all association "innocent" neighbor being hauled off to jail and awaiting an indefinite court date... if they didn't do something suspicious or that breaks the law.

You know what they say about not doing the crime, if you can't pay the time.

Another "it's never affected me personally so it must be ok" loser. Fucking clueless.

Lane · 09-14-2003, 05:46 PM

i think republicans believe in ideology enforcement

kinda reminds of things from history

ThunderBalls · 09-14-2003, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

When I actually feel my freedoms have been taken away, then I will say "Ok I was wrong"... but as of now, it doesn't effect me and I don't plan on organizing any protests anytime soon, so I am STILL grateful for all the freedoms I utilize everyday.

Uh...hello. Are you truly that ignorant? And people wonder why the rest of the world think Americans are stupid.

Read and try thinking:

"When they came for the Catholics I said nothing because I was not a Catholic.

When they came for the Jews I said nothing because I was not a Jew.

When they came for the union members I said nothing because I was not a union member.

When they came for me no one said anything because they all had already been taken."

Lutheran minister Neumeuller

theking · 09-14-2003, 06:06 PM

The Patriot Act was brought into effect to help fight the enemy within...terrorists...inside the USA...and outside the USA.

Some of you do not like the Patriot Act. Specifically what measures would you employ to help fight the enemy within and outside the USA...none?

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 06:08 PM

I understand that being pro-Bush and Republican isn't trendy to a lot of you ignorant and paranoid assholes, but I am not trying to win your votes. Flame away

USA Is Doomed · 09-14-2003, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The Patriot Act was brought into effect to help fight the enemy within...terrorists...inside the USA...and outside the USA.

Some of you do not like the Patriot Act. Specifically what measures would you employ to help fight the enemy within and outside the USA...none?

shut up faggot.

we ain't got no space for white trash here.

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The Patriot Act was brought into effect to help fight the enemy within...terrorists...inside the USA...and outside the USA.

Some of you do not like the Patriot Act. Specifically what measures would you employ to help fight the enemy within and outside the USA...none?

Anything that can be used just as easily against people who aren't the enemy is going too far. Also, anything that takes away peoples' rights, just because we lump them into the category "enemy" is going to far.

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female
I understand that being pro-Bush and Republican isn't trendy to a lot of you ignorant and paranoid assholes, but I am not trying to win your votes. Flame away

A pro-Bush pornographer?

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 06:11 PM

Why would a Republican bother to win votes. Don't they just steal them? ;)

ThunderBalls · 09-14-2003, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The Patriot Act was brought into effect to help fight the enemy within...terrorists...inside the USA...and outside the USA.

Some of you do not like the Patriot Act. Specifically what measures would you employ to help fight the enemy within and outside the USA...none?

Personally I would have rather seen the borders closed and all middle easterners that were not born here deported.

gothweb · 09-14-2003, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Personally I would have rather seen the borders closed and all middle easterners that were not born here deported.

Well done. A solution that is equally insane, but builds in an even healthier dose of racism.

Furious_Female · 09-14-2003, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

A pro-Bush pornographer?

I'm not breaking the laws. I just promote adult content.

I said Republican, not saint

Arnold is running for Cali governor under the Republican party... him posing in speedos, showing his body are more pornographic than some images I have promoted as "adult"

USA Is Doomed · 09-14-2003, 06:19 PM

people like theking, colin, rooster, and the rest of the naive souls who start from the point of believing the government and believing the government is there for the common good (

) then very occasionally find a reason to possibly doubt the motives of the government for just a few minutes...

people like that are irrelevant anyway. they're like all the Russians who supported and believed in the USSR right to the very end.

"The USSR is big, strong and powerful with a huge military - nothing can touch us"

I know what's going to happen, and it's going to be very, very amusing to watch.

And then we'll find that suddenly, the cat's got theking's tongue.

the US is fucked. and theking, rooster, Colin, 12clicks and the rest of that confused bunch can post on here, and retort 'til the cows come home.

won't do any good though. and it will be very amusing watching them scramble around, trying to grab hold of something that still makes sense to them.

The US is fucked. Totally fucked.

It's clear for all to see.

You can either stick your head in the sand until it's too late.

Or jump the sinking ship.

Libertine · 09-14-2003, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

I'm not breaking the laws. I just promote adult content.

I said Republican, not saint

Arnold is running for Cali governor under the Republican party... him posing in speedos, showing his body are more pornographic than some images I have promoted as "adult"

You're right. Bush and Ashcroft would never try to outlaw porn or other things they consider "obscene". Nor would they take action against porn with existing laws, for instance by sending out a bunch of prosecutors to hunt for porn. Right?

theking · 09-14-2003, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb

Anything that can be used just as easily against people who aren't the enemy is going too far. Also, anything that takes away peoples' rights, just because we lump them into the category "enemy" is going to far.

That did not answer the question...what measures would you employ to fight the enemy within and outside the USA...whose goal is to kill as many Americans as possible. Surely you do not think new laws...new methods of enforcement...should not be employed?? You do not like what Congress passed...let us see what you would propose.

PimpMeNot · 09-14-2003, 06:25 PM

directfiesta: I thought you were a small cocked Canadian faggot...

punkworld: Why don;t you go back to Romania?

Furious_Female: Don't mind most of the retards here, they are anti-Bush because it seems the thing to be nowadays.

USA Is Doomed: When you are done sodomizing your mama's camel; why don't you shut up your ignorant pie hole?

ThunderBalls: Rush?

You've got a guy, who graduated college because daddy made a big donation, for President.
You've got a future Reverend, who thinks that kissing your girlfriend before you are married will put you in hell, for Attorney General.
You've got an ex General, who does not understand how the world works, for Secretary of State.
And your best hope for salvation from these clowns is Mr Dean

09-14-2003, 02:40 PM	#1
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	Patriot Act: Slippery slop has begun... http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/14...tid=123&tid=99 http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid...&cat=terrorism "New Terror Laws Used Against Common Criminals" And I think that answers Pathfinder's question... __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

09-14-2003, 02:54 PM	#3
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	'...Federal Government Overlords.... Oh wait, we've had them since 1776. DOH!!' __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

09-14-2003, 03:09 PM	#5
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	This makes me quite scared, and indeed ashamed, to be headed back to my Homeland. I hope my vote can do something to help undo this. A patriot is someone who makes their country the place it should be, not someone who lets the government do anything. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

09-14-2003, 03:16 PM	#7
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	Bush's Justice Department is using unconstitutional anti-terror laws against gamblers and drug users, who have nothing to do with terror. I thought right wingers wanted "less government"? __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

09-14-2003, 04:29 PM	#16
VirtuMike Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Seat 1A Posts: 2,483	I forget - what was the difference between the FBI and KGB? __________________ Host it in AMSTERDAM at EUROTIVITY! - We also offer BACKUP SERVICES! XYZZY4L

09-14-2003, 03:05 PM	#4
rossiya2 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 287	Most lawmakers admit that they never read the bill before voting on it. Put simply, from October 23 to October 26, a massive piece of legislation was rammed through both the House of Representatives and Senate, without public hearings of any sort. The USA Patriot Act was sold as the legal measures required to prevent future terroristic attacks on U.S. soil. In the wake of the September 11, 2001 Massacre, the American people were gripped in fear. Any and all measures of self-protection seemed desirable. But in the hysteria, the people of this country allowed its President, aided and abetted by both houses of the federal legislature, to essentially violate the U.S. Constitution and, in turn, strip away the basic civil liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights. This was done in the name of "national security". The USA Patriot Act (PA) is composed of many laws already on the books that are designed to counter terrorism in the U.S. What distinguishes the Patriot Act from these pre-September 11 laws is its ENABLING characteristics. Put simply, the criminal statutes, investigative rules and court procedures which safeguarded our constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties in previous anti-terror legislation were stripped away. They have been replaced by a system Executive Branch fiat, now institutionalized in the department of Homeland Security. How did the USA Patriot Act accomplish this feat? The USA Patriot Act effectively eliminated: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious labor, and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records requests. FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation. RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes. FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' personal records, business documents and telephone/internet activity without probable cause to assist terror investigation. RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial. RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront the witnesses against them. While many Americans were led by the Bush administration to believe that the Patriot Act was solely directed at foreign nationals in the U.S. who may pose a military threat to citizens and property (specifically people of Southwest Asian and North African descent--a vulgarian version of racial profiling), it swiftly emerged that the actual day-to-day targets of the Patriot Act were U.S. citizens and legal aliens. Overwhelmingly, they have suffered the abuses of federal police policies which have led to public humiliation, invasion of personal privacy, intimidation, movement control and monitoring, capricious arrest and detention, and denial of legal remedy in the court system.

09-14-2003, 03:11 PM	#6
Rorschach So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,579	It was only a matter of time... The whole "chemical weapons" thing would be great comedy if it didn't involve some dumb tweaker getting locked up for life.

09-14-2003, 03:18 PM	#8
ThunderBalls So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Mesosphere Posts: 2,926	<center><img src="http://www.whitehouse.org/homeland/images/chaos.gif"> <img src="http://www.whitehouse.org/homeland/images/panic.gif"> <img src="http://www.whitehouse.org/homeland/images/paranoia_anim.gif"> <img src="http://www.whitehouse.org/homeland/images/apathy.gif"> <img src="http://www.whitehouse.org/homeland/images/stupor.gif"></center>

09-14-2003, 03:20 PM	#9
goBigtime Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 7,761	Can the Patriot Act be removed with another president or vote or something?

09-14-2003, 04:31 PM	#17
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Well if anyone of you want to know if any of this shit is true, let me tell you first hand that it is.. In 1999 my wife was accused of a felony, and due to the fact that our attorneys caught the officers in the case lying, and refusing to take evidence that would hurt the states case,and the assistant state attorney did nothing about it, we decided not to risk what they may have written in the reports. They offered that if she woulf help them in a case, they would offer her probation instead of 5 years. So she took the probation. 340 days. Now my wife is from Cuba and holds a green card. She has been here for over 10 years.. Well she served her time for what she was accused of. On the 28th of August 2003, INS came to our house at 6am and took her into custody. She has been sitting in jail since then waiting to see a judge. They took her from here (m Gainesville ) to a county jail 200 miles north of here and told her that she would then be sent to Orlando. They told her that she would only be there 4 days. 14 days later they transported her to Orlande, where she spent one night, and then they moved her to Miami. She has been there for 3 days now, and we think that she may see a judge, by the 30th. We have been told by out attorney that most likely she will do another 90days, because she plead guilty. And then there is a CHANCE that she will be let go. But there have been and still are some cubans that are being held, with no chance to be released until cuba is free. Those people that are being held have already served their sentence. . This is a sad day in america. Now it looks like the only way that I can get her out is to find another country that will allow the US to deport her there. Which means that I an american citizen by birth am being forced out of the US! __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

09-14-2003, 04:37 PM	#19
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	"Does anyone believe these modifications will actually sacrifice liberties of everyday upstanding, law abiding citizens?" Yes. Talking shit about the leadership can now lead to your arrest and the seizure of your assets. We used to have the right to speak out but the muzzle is comming on. Organise a protest and you will be labled something so an invistigation can be made on you. That sound like freedom? __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

09-14-2003, 05:34 PM	#30
USA Is Doomed So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 132	All we need now is Colin pointing to a few statistics (usually Government statistics ;-) that reveal that everything is actually 'a okay and always will be'.

09-14-2003, 05:41 PM	#34
smack Push Porn Like Weight. Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Inside .NET Posts: 10,652	i just got my telescreen today. came ups priority. ashahahahaha says it's gotta be installed in the wall next week. and i got a letter from the ministry of love too..... this doesn't look good. __________________ Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

09-14-2003, 05:46 PM	#36
Lane Will code for food... Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Buckeye, AZ Posts: 8,496	i think republicans believe in ideology enforcement kinda reminds of things from history __________________

09-14-2003, 06:06 PM	#38
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	The Patriot Act was brought into effect to help fight the enemy within...terrorists...inside the USA...and outside the USA. Some of you do not like the Patriot Act. Specifically what measures would you employ to help fight the enemy within and outside the USA...none? __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

09-14-2003, 06:08 PM	#39
Furious_Female Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Upstate, New York Posts: 8,187	I understand that being pro-Bush and Republican isn't trendy to a lot of you ignorant and paranoid assholes, but I am not trying to win your votes. Flame away __________________ Skype: j3nn.com ICQ 160370494 My current favorite high-converting sponsor: CrakRevenue

09-14-2003, 06:11 PM	#43
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	Why would a Republican bother to win votes. Don't they just steal them? ;) __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

09-14-2003, 06:19 PM	#47
USA Is Doomed So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 132	people like theking, colin, rooster, and the rest of the naive souls who start from the point of believing the government and believing the government is there for the common good () then very occasionally find a reason to possibly doubt the motives of the government for just a few minutes... people like that are irrelevant anyway. they're like all the Russians who supported and believed in the USSR right to the very end. "The USSR is big, strong and powerful with a huge military - nothing can touch us" I know what's going to happen, and it's going to be very, very amusing to watch. And then we'll find that suddenly, the cat's got theking's tongue. the US is fucked. and theking, rooster, Colin, 12clicks and the rest of that confused bunch can post on here, and retort 'til the cows come home. won't do any good though. and it will be very amusing watching them scramble around, trying to grab hold of something that still makes sense to them. The US is fucked. Totally fucked. It's clear for all to see. You can either stick your head in the sand until it's too late. Or jump the sinking ship.

09-14-2003, 06:25 PM	#50
PimpMeNot Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Pimp Land Posts: 342	directfiesta: I thought you were a small cocked Canadian faggot... punkworld: Why don;t you go back to Romania? Furious_Female: Don't mind most of the retards here, they are anti-Bush because it seems the thing to be nowadays. USA Is Doomed: When you are done sodomizing your mama's camel; why don't you shut up your ignorant pie hole? ThunderBalls: Rush? You've got a guy, who graduated college because daddy made a big donation, for President. You've got a future Reverend, who thinks that kissing your girlfriend before you are married will put you in hell, for Attorney General. You've got an ex General, who does not understand how the world works, for Secretary of State. And your best hope for salvation from these clowns is Mr Dean __________________ yes