pedo

Hamburger.

<img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/archives/indc/td/davinci/dvntour_july6.jpg">

:1orglaugh

I can't believe a serious debate on underage plastic dolls.

OMG LOL, this board has become a fucking insane asylum.

:1orglaugh

I think the idea is fucking brilliant, and if the BP crew doesn't do it, I probably will. CP is disgusting and nasty, not because it's illegal, but because it hurts children.

This ain't the same thing by a long shot.

hmmmm.... this is a complicated issue... but think...

ok making underage dolls isnt going to hurt any human or non human being....

but you are obviously selling to someone who has fantasies with underage girls... is that correct?

let me give another example...

selling real guns to criminals isnt right.... if I produce a gun that is made of plastic and wouldnt hurt anyone, should I still produce it and sell it to the criminal?

my point is.. the fact alone isn't wrong... but the final point of this... can be considered legal/ethic?

anyway.... its complicated.. :)
gepe

You start mfg. and selling kid sized fuck toys and you'll be so swarmed by the Feds you won't know what hit you.

Not :thumbsup But :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Put up the dolls in a NY park. Each time someone closes up, chop them heads off with a machine.
:Hollering :eek2 :eek7 :Hollering

Maybe this is only a *slight* point, but your analogy would have been more accurate if you said this:

Selling real guns to criminals isn't right. If I produce a gun that is made of plastic and wouldn't hurt anyone, should I still produce it and sell it to the *person who fantasizes about being a criminal*

Well.. if that were your question, I would say this. I have no strong moral objections to toy gun manufacturers, and neither do MOST americans -- I am not advocating selling child-dolls to child molestors.. I am advocating selling child-dolls to people who FANTASISE about being child molesters.

All you people who have pictures of chicks in school girl uniforms on your website, and who are still arguing with me are hypocrites, or too blind to tell the difference between fantasy and reality.

BTW.. I agree with you on that 100% !! I still don't think it's wrong. Hurting children is wrong -- fantasizing is not. I'd rather a guy has sex with a fake child-doll than a real child.

Sorry dude, that's the hand of a 16 year old.

if you say so...

shit BP.. why didn't you bring this up before?

i have a few of these already made.

hit me up next time you want to hit dolphin yo. i'll bring a couple along.

I don't know man. I sure the hell wouldnt like the idea of my neighbor fucking some kid doll fantasizing about molesting kids with my kid wandering around outside.

You are my secret hero :winkwink:

Man, you get more stupid with every post.

http://www.hackcanada.com/canadian/f.../doll-sex.html

Man had sex with child-like doll

The Edmonton Sun, Friday, May 1, 1998
Gretchen Drummie, Sun Media

TORONTO- A cameraman for Toronto's city-TV was given a one-year conditional sentence yesterday over sex with an anatomically correct mail-order child mannequin only five minutes after he took delivery.

Oliver Weedon, 25, pleaded guilty to two charges of possessing child porn - a foam rubber doll in the image of a girl aged 10 to 12; and a series of computer-made pictures.

"The inference was he obviously had relations with the doll within 20 minutes... and broke the doll's leg when having sex," prosecutor Calvin Barry said, adding semen was found in the doll.

On April 16, 1997, Barry said, a Canada Customs investigator alerted the Toronto police pornography section to their interception of a child-like dummy.

The mannequin, with physical features of a young girl, had been imported to Canada from Japan and was to be delivered to Weedon in Toronto, said Barry.

He said Weedon paid $800 US for the dummy, which came with a wig, panties and pubic hair. He said police also seized material that included pornographic cartoons.

Police were told that customs had also intercepted a large quantity of imported child porn meant to be delivered to Weedon, including videotapes that depicted bondage, degradation, sex assault, bestiality and child porn, said Barry.

Police showed the material and the doll to forensic psychiatrist Dr. Peter Collins, who determined it to be the type which a pedophile would collect. A week later, a "controlled delivery" of the mannequin was made to Weedon's home.

Barry said Weedon signed for it and 20 minutes later police executed a Criminal Code search warrant and found the doll under a bed.

its a good thing you posted that article,

I was thinking about luring this one over to my place, but I better not,


http://www.ori-int.com/images/gallery/g-mayu3.jpg

PS do you guys think she does anal?

She's a shy one, won't even take her clothes off to take a bath.

Yeah but it's the shy one's you have to look out for...


:winkwink:

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

He prolly got busted for the images.
There's no way one would get arrested for fucking a doll.

Whats if one fucks a teddybear ? Will he get arrested for "being cruel to animals" ??

because it's an old thread.

well in all seriousness, I guess its context,

if someone is a suspected pedo, I dont think you shoudl leave them alone with there toys until they go to far,

best to be proactive,

but I mean if I bough a underage real doll, and used, it for shock value, marketing, a joke, or some sick, twisted nead to colect stupid shit,

I dont see why that would be ilegal or why I would be worried,

but also on retrospect, I dont think that site is a joke, like the post was meant to be,

the picture with the girl , shes in a bath rube with bath toys,

shes is posed even younger than her body looks looks,

Id place the dolls body at around 114 or 15,

but the maketing, and surounding place the age much lower,

IM actually starting to feal a bit guilty about making sick jokes, as I write this,

good eye.

Better to be fucking a doll that looks like it is 12 than grabbing some 12 year old girl off the street to full fill his desires.

I think it's wrong... for the same reason that people buy pets because they are lonely...

Get a life, not a doll.

Dolls are for kids.