This is fucking ridiculous

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • completetosser
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 1419
    #1

    This is fucking ridiculous

    Just had my latest knockback from google adwords - a term that has been OK for three days isn't acceptable today because it 'doesn't reflect adult content'

    The phrase is 'sex pics'

    If anyone can tell me how that doesn't reflect 'adult content' please let me know, because I'm fucked if I can figure it out.
    Tags: None
    • X37375787
      #2
      maybe 12 year olds search for information on interhuman sexual intercourse. can't serve them porn!!

        Comment

        • completetosser
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2003
          • 1419
          #3
          What amazed me was they suggested 'sex clips' as an alternative - what's the difference? I would have thought if anything that 'sex pics' was more 'adult'

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...