You keep indicating that Easton is DOING coke, or the model is DOING coke off of his cock....

I see nowhere that he is actually DOING the coke. This is "LIBEL" my friend. You weren't there... your words are merely speculative.

Copyright, I have a screenshot of these images being hosted on YOUR server. This is copyright infringement. If you don't think so, maybe you should read more.

Defamation, again, what is he DOING in these pics other than taking a pic with a small bag of white powder?????

Keep it coming you clueless ass monkey.

:321GFY

MY EYES! MY EYES! DEAR GOD I AM FUCKING BLIND.

May I suggest that you call the law school that gave you your degree and demand a refund. Apparently you didn't learn anything.

id need the purest coke in columbia to hit that

FRANKENSTEIN, let Easton sue me. I will lose no sleep at all. Give me a fucking break.


Would be entertaining for sure, he has a problem with coke, thats no secret. There is a reason those photos were removed, is he now ashamed? Was not long ago he was gloating.............

This is only the start, I will ramp it up real good next week kiddies, I promise!

If you need an attorney, mine will help you. There are so many weak bastards out here, that I will have to admit...you, Serge, and FM are about the only ones left with balls!:evil-laug

It's not libel unless he is defaming an innocent Easton and Easton's lawyers can prove so in a court of law (or compel Brad to settle out of court). The burden of proof is on the accuser to prove defamation and libel, not the accused to prove jack shit.

So if Easton wants to win a defamation suit, all he has to do is prove that he didn't do coke or have someone do coke off his cock at the porn convention and that Brad made it up to slander him.

I'm gonna have to go ahead and say that Brad is pretty safe here.

I tried Google Image search but could not find that image.

:1orglaugh

Lets start a fund against brad on defaming easton

If anything it will cost him alot in attorney fee's
unless he just like's to throw money away.

Or post what you know about brad shaw and whoever has the best dirt gets the pot. Ha Ha ha


everyone has skeletons in there closet

The issue wouldn't be specifically if someone did coke off his cock. That has nothing to do with the defamation and libel. The issue is simply whether or not Easton does coke. From what I have heard and read, the witness list to that point would be pretty long.

Technically I suppose that fubar could sue for C.I. Although, proving damages would be difficult, I don't see any. I also don't think that they would have much time to spend on the C.I. case while they defend themselves from the countless misappropriation suits filed against them by all the people in the pictures on their website that never gave consent to be published. Ok...kind of a run on sentence, but I believe it makes my point.

JMM when are you going to law school? I would love to put you on retainer!!

Tell me where to donate, I will throw in the first $100!

It's a shame to see Kimmy have to be dragged through this shit you people feel the need to sling.

:(

My life has been thrown all over gfy the past couple years, not sure there are many skeletons left! Someone could base a good soap opera off of it, just make sure I get my cut.

Yeah you are to busy to look around because you are here talking about it ... :1orglaugh

Funny you should ask, talking to a few schools right now. Trying to start around the first of the year.

I am planning on representing Brad on all these lawsuits the GFY geniuses are planning against him. It's a few years from now, but I'm pretty sure this thread will still be alive and kicking at that time.

LMAO

At least you have a good sense of humor about it.

What you are forgetting Sir the pictures are my property! You have absolutely NO permission to use them, or to have them on your server or any place else. You are stealing content from me! Cease and Desist !

I'm kinda glad Brad Shaw is back on the boards too. :glugglug

JFK, do you have a signed release from every person in every picture on your website giving you their consent to publish their image and likeness?

Does the newspaper photographer grab signatures when he takes a photo of an event?

No, but he still owns the rights to the image.

I didn't say that he didn't. In fact, if you scroll up, you will see where I did point that out. That's not the point.

Threads like this are making me a Brad Shaw fan. Keep up the good work man. I hope you take those pics and print them out and make some fliers to pass out around the Vegas internext.

So why is it relevent that he has a signed release from every person on his site?

Here is an idea for you, how about reading all the posts in a thread. It is extremely relevant. Yes, he could probably sue Brad for infringement. What would he collect? Little to nothing. Damages in this case are minimal, if even existent at all. In addition, FUBAR pics are hotlinked and used all the time, has he sued all of those people as well?

Once he is done suing Brad for CI, he can expect that he may be sued by every person in every picture on his site for misappropriation of likeness. I see mega damages there. Private citizens, attending private parties, having their image and likeness published on a porn webmaster board. Believe it or not, there are a lot of people in our business who don't tell others what they do for a living.

See my point now?

Not really.

All those people were at private parties with loads of photographers taking pics; with JFK taking pics for his website which has only pics of webmaster events.

Kinda like Girls Gone Wild?

That point aside, i think it is wrong to take someone else's photo and put it on your server.

As a content person, i would have thought you would have agreed on that?

What I think is funny is how people twist things.

When sexeducation had stolen pics, no one was on his side.
Which is correct.

Some time ago there was a public event photographer that had his pics stolen, people were on the photographers side.
Someone stated that the photographer had the law on his side.

Now we have the same issue, but now people (at least JMM and Brad) are NOT on the photographers side.
They state they have the law on their side.


Funny how things works.

Are you one of those mongoloids I have been reading about that are offered Internet access through public funding? Can't you detect sarcasm when you read it?

Fuck off idiot.

I don't care if he keeps coke, sugar, anthrax or dehydrated dog shit in those packets.

edited to add:
If you knew anyone that had diabetes you would know that they often keep a sugary snack on hand in case their blood sugar gets too low. Fuckhead. Not that I was even implying that was the case here. You fucking piece of dirty foreign shit. And they don't inject sugar into their arms, they inject insulin. If I could reach through this screen I would choke the ignorant breath out of your lungs.

JFK, only mail I read should be certified. My address is easy to find..... Are those your pictures, you sure????

Oh, so these were PRIVATE parties? If I understand correctly, GGW is possible because of PUBLIC parties.

Please correct me if I'm wrong...

It is scary to see the ignorance of basic legal issues. Don't they teach the basics in school anymore?? I took intro to business law in High School....

I would have to say ignorance of legal issues is one of the big things that get webmasters into trouble...

JMM has a keen understanding of the law, better then many people I went to law school with....

JMM I am serious about putting you on retainer!! :winkwink:

When it comes to legal issues, I just call Jeff. Saves me alot of $.

Hi Sly.

I'm not sure what you call "private", and what you call "public" ?

I thought the issue with GGW, is that the people that appeared on film *knew* there were photos being taken of them, due to the general activity of mardi-gras, and the fact that they have a dozen lens shoved in their faces.

To me, if you value your privacy, and dont want anyone to know that you are involved in the adult industry, then you dont go to conventions; least of all to wild porno parties which are world reknowned for their photographic reporting.


No comment on that from JMM?

I'm not a lawyer, but that doesn't mean i can't have a reasonable debate with people who are:

who the fuck are you you fucker ! is this some personal vendetta .. next internex ill jam a fucking pound of coke up your fucking ass and take a picture... if this so disturbs you get out of the fucking business and move to newfounland asshole.

:1orglaugh