I thought Acacia owned digital audio downloads?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ludedude
    Suck it!
    • Jun 2001
    • 4432

    #1

    I thought Acacia owned digital audio downloads?

    Heh apparently patents are not mutually exclusive

    Microsoft sued for digital audio downloads

    http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5090679.html
  • iroc409
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 4728

    #2
    pathetic.


    "We'll likely take action to protect our past rights in the United States in a not-too-distant future," Angowitz said.
    <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a>


    icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0
    Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

    Comment

    • FightThisPatent
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2003
      • 4090

      #3
      Originally posted by Ludedude
      Heh apparently patents are not mutually exclusive

      Microsoft sued for digital audio downloads

      http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5090679.html


      Besides Acacia, there is SightSound suing CDNOW/BMG over the paid downloades of digital audio/video, and USA Video suing Movielink.com for downloads of video faster than real time.

      Burst.com has a patent earlier than everyone, and could be the next Acacia.. they are currently targeting Microsoft.

      Another player into this mix is E-Data.... i was going to post about them, but decided this is all too much... we should just focus on one battle at a time against this war on business and patent abuse.

      Fight the Patent!

      http://www.t3report.com
      (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
      http://www.FightThePatent.com
      | ICQ 52741957

      Comment

      • crockett
        in a van by the river
        • May 2003
        • 76818

        #4
        man the patent office needs to get it's act together... IMO you shouldn't beable to patent an Idea... if you can't build it.. then you shouldn't beable to own a patent for it. This would be a direct way to stop all this BS patent abuse.



        pretty soon someone will own the patent for thinking.
        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

        Comment

        • Scootermuze
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2001
          • 4513

          #5
          Originally posted by crockett
          man the patent office needs to get it's act together... IMO you shouldn't beable to patent an Idea... if you can't build it.. then you shouldn't beable to own a patent for it. This would be a direct way to stop all this BS patent abuse.



          pretty soon someone will own the patent for thinking.
          Patents are supposed to be for the purpose of protecting inventors, yet these inventors can turn around and sell their patent to any Joe Schmuck that wants to pay the price.. So now Joe Schmuch can claim patent rights to an invention that he had nothing to do with..
          The patent then becomes a business tool and defeats the purpose of a patent..
          Patent law definitely need to be changed..

          Comment

          • FightThisPatent
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2003
            • 4090

            #6
            Originally posted by Scootermuze


            The patent then becomes a business tool and defeats the purpose of a patent..
            Patent law definitely need to be changed..


            Here is an article for you that addresses your point:
            http://www.fighthepatent.com/v2/MakingMoney.html



            Fight the Patent!

            http://www.t3report.com
            (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
            http://www.FightThePatent.com
            | ICQ 52741957

            Comment

            Working...