That $8000 is for 100Mbps and two high-end servers. Also note, that next to that price it says that discounts are available.

We are offering a co-location special (on the specials page) - 100Mbps for 5000 / MRC. Good until Friday.

Interesting ... a little expencive but I guess you have the best *nix boxes and good technical experience. Si I understand the concept.

Good luck with the project and we might come around one day.

A little expensive compared to whom?

Compared to my mindset and maybe RS

Lensman did you miss this post? I'd like to know why you require a 12 month comittment. That's the only thing keeping me from setting up a server there.

Kudos

It's really ironic to see a Candid Hos.... banner that even speaks at the top when I read this thread.

By the way. I love your webpage layout for your new hosting company. Good job.

Lenny - Hit me up on ICQ. 74335014

Not bad for a Tier 4 provider :winkwink: Up +433

http://www.hostcount.com/cgi-bin/cgifind.exe?Find="jupiterhosting.com"


It took me a while to get to Tier 1 but it's nice to have
the peering agreements we have in place now.

http://www.hostcount.com/cgi-bin/cgi...ubm it=Search

I'd just like to say, I was pushing XFR here long before Lensman aquired XFR. The day he aquired XFR, they only got better. It was top notch pro shit back then and it is un-fucking-paralleled now. Launching Jupiter gives you guys an open window to get some serious hosting and rise above the entry-level shit you're on.

If you're gonna run with the big dogs, you know where to go. If you're a punk poser forehead-cocksmear.... well, we know what you do already.

Bash if you must, but at the end of the day, these servers are up and running strong. And that's the bottom line.

Congrats Lensman! The site looks excellent and I'm sure that your company will have true staying power in our industry if your hosting company has the same level of integrity as all your other ventures :)

Reliable, HostCount doesn't mean shit... Their results for most hosts are so far off the mark it's completely laughable! Although, it's entertaining to see all of us with nice rankings.

Cheers,

Brad

Yea now that's really smart. Host all your sensitive data with your competitor's hosting company! :thumbsup

I'm so excited!! Thanks Lensman, for everything! :thumbsup

wha? You lost me....

everything I have is on XFR servers.

hmm well I use it to gauge the size of the network and see if they have peering agreements, etc

As for tracking it's uptime and downtime.. it seems to try to place companies based on a group of IP's and their performance.. so that could be quite biased.. who knows what IP's they are tracking right?

But the size and peering agreement information is fairly accurate and much of this information can be found at fixedorbit.com

Ummm... what? You do realize that these are two different companies. That ICS's involvement extends only to the board room. Read the post.

I think he's been.... you know.... smokin' tha ganja again. Either that or sniffing some really high grade silver spray paint.

OMG - Are you kidding me??

Fixed orbit only lists adjacencies and you know that. It does not list all of your peers. Hell, we have 20+ more peers than what fixedorbit lists (LOL). Hostcount only counts the number of domains you host in DNS and whois info.. I could spoof hostcount and be in the top 25 (but apparently you already knew that). Give me some credit and get your own thread.

100 bitches.

I never said it was 100% accurate, but the info that is available is useful enough.

When I drop a 2 lbs. t-bone steak in front of my doggie and ask him not to touch it - then leave him alone & check back later - will the steak still be there? lol :glugglug

useful enough to??????? what? Make a hosting decision on? LOL

Like finding you purchase transit with cogent and charge almost 2 X what we charge for bandwidth? Your right.. it is usefull.

http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/22/AS22781.htm

dude... you are making zero sense. I think you're a little confused on the exact nature of all this.

You right.. how could I have been SUCH a fool. Adult.com has nothing else better to do than to engage in illegal activities like what your insinuating.

(evel eyes looking back and forth)... Mmmwoo ha ha..

Fun thread.. but time for dinner!

Company A has 500 million members on there site and they are hosted on a company that Company B owns.

Make any sense now?

Alot of sensitive materials that Company B would LOVE to get their hands on :)


Not saying they would, but who knows, I think thats what Madball is saying.

Let me get this straight.. the host with the most overloaded DNS Servers is best?

That's not one of the metrics I use to measure the quality of a host, but that's just me!

Well, unlike your graphics guy you at least got the point hahahaha :glugglug Have a good dinner!

some of you people live in a very warped disillusioned world.

A² + B² = C²

I'm glad I don't have to spend my day thinking like a thief and trying to cover every possible scenario that a thief could come up with.

more power to ya.

So, this then applies to CaveCreek, Candid, and SinHost (no offense guys) along with any other hosts who have direct or indirect involvement in any other aspects of the adult industry.

hmmmm. okay. I understand.. it's part of the decision making process. If this is the worst aspect of my company, then I am a happy man.

it applies to anyone in the service departments.... including me. Sure, I'm in a position to do some major ripping off....


like I said... I'm glad I don't think that way. Must be a pretty shitty existence and not one I care to live.

I guess no one should host with Candid, or Flying Croc either, because they have paysites.

Your logic is flawed, just because a host doesn't have paysites, he is not interested in your email lists?

You must think we are the stupidest people on earth! Imagine if we stole a mailing list from a customer, don't you think those things are seeded like crazy? They would know it in about 2 seconds. They go public with it am I'm outta business with 12 different businesses we current operate. If anything, we would have much less incentive to access your data because we have much more to lose than a hosting-only company.

Think before you speak.

Just my :2 cents: but Ray is good person to work with and Ben and Josh also

Brian

But it's GFY, do we hafta?

GFY wouldn't be any fun if people did that..........................

Hey Amp/Lens does this mean that your servers won't crash for the 2,000,000 post contest like they did for the millionth? That was some good times though. =)

Mark

haha

Haha, wasn't a datacenter issue. But we've got some plans for that one.

the program looks really good lens.