![]() |
Of coarse, your country's probably in good hands with Bush...
http://www.bigleaguebetting.com/bush...it_graphic.gif P.S. 50 |
12clicks:
Quote:
Tis amusing you got this blinkered "socialist" thing going - I ain't been pigeon-holed as a socialist too much!! :1orglaugh Some news for you... I do not rely for one thing on "you buying so much". It may comes as news to you in your "US bubble", but there is a whole world outside the bubble! Stupid asshole! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Ummmm....
Specific to Canada, and I don't if you've been there, the US dollar is very strong against Canada, yet the prices in shop windows look the same US prices, i.e., something costs you $100 in the US you're likely to see it as $100CAD (Canadian dollars) in Canada. $100CAD = $73US. So workers for example, that cost US companies $30000US in Canada would cost the company $21983 in Canada to pay them an equivalent salary with the same buying power. It's easier to bring the price down on something when your labor is cheap, and contrary to Asian countries where labor is cheap and conditions horrible, Canada as an industrialized country can produce the same quality and good working conditions. (Better actually, due to socialized healthcare). Now here's a couple more facts. More Than Half of All U.S. Automotive Exports Go to Canada Canada and the United States are involved in an integrated and mutually profitable trade in automobiles, trucks and auto parts. In 2001, transportation equipment accounted for almost a third of both U.S. merchandise exports to and imports from Canada. U.S. manufacturers sold over $23 billion in motor vehicle parts, engines and engine parts, and $13 billion worth of automobiles and trucks to Canada. The United States bought $40 billion worth of autos and trucks and $14 billion in parts and engines from Canada. U.S. exports to Canada also included $12 billion in high-tech equipment, in particular, $6 billion worth of computers and $2 billion worth of tubes and semi-conductors. The United States supplied Canada with a variety of other goods, including $8 billion in agricultural products, $3 billion in pharmaceuticals, $2 billion in organic chemicals and $2 billion in paper. Canada Is the United States' Leading Foreign Source of Energy Canada's energy exports to the United States totalled $35 billion in 2001. Exports included $17 billion in natural gas, $10 billion in crude petroleum, and $6 billion in petroleum and coal products. In addition, Canada supplied close to 100% of U.S. electricity imports, worth $2 billion. Canadian forest product exports amounted to $20 billion and included $6 billion in softwood lumber and $5 billion in newsprint. The United States also purchased $8 billion in airplanes, their engines and parts; $4 billion in aluminum and aluminum alloys; and $3 billion in office machines. The United States' Current Account Deficit with Canada Amounts to Only 6% of All Bilateral Transactions The U.S.-Canada current account ? the balance of trade in goods, services and income flows ? has shifted back and forth over the past few decades. In 2001, Canada's current account surplus decreased from $30 billion to $27 billion. The U.S. current account with the world showed a negative balance of $393 billion, 14% of all its international transactions. Canada Ranks Second in U.S. Investment Abroad Investment ? both inflows and outflows ? is a key contributor to job creation and international competitiveness. In 2001, a record $25 billion in new direct investment flowed into Canada from the United States. The total U.S. stock in Canada at the end of the year amounted to $139 billion. The United States is by far the largest foreign source of capital in Canada, accounting for 67% of the total stock. This represented 10% of all U.S. direct investment abroad. The bulk of U.S. investment in Canada, 39%, was in the manufacturing industries, led by transportation, which made up 10% of the total. Finance, insurance and real estate together accounted for 27%, and petroleum for 17%. Canada Led New Foreign Investment in the United States in 2001 Canadian investors spent almost $17 billion to acquire or establish businesses in the United States, more than any other country invested. Half of all Canadian direct investment abroad is in the United States. At the end of 2001, Canada had an accumulated total of $109 billion invested there, 8% of all foreign direct investment in the United States. Almost 37% was in the manufacturing sector, led by machinery firms with 15% of the total. Finance, insurance and real estate accounted for another 36%, and service industries for 5%. The United States Has a Surplus in Services Trade with Canada The United States leads the world in the export of services, ranging from computer software, to transportation, to professional expertise. Canada continues to be a top customer, with purchases of $24 billion in 2001. U.S. exports of services to Canada rose by 3% over the previous year, while its exports to the world fell by 4%. Canada provided the United States with $18 billion worth of services in 2001. In recent years, the United States has consistently posted a surplus in services trade with Canada, while Canada has recorded a surplus in the exchange of goods. The United States Has Sold More Goods to Canada Than to Any Other Country in Each of the Last 56 Years Historically, Canada has been the leading foreign export market for U.S. goods. U.S. merchandise exports to Canada have consistently exceeded exports to other countries by wide margins. In the past 20 years, U.S. merchandise exports to Canada have quadrupled. In 2001, Canada was the leading export market for 37 of the 50 states. We don't need them?? Yah...right. -doug |
Rich:
Quote:
But.. tis his mouth that I was wondering about...... |
A "Trade War" between the US and Canada? Wouldn't NAFTA cause a few problems with that?
Also, in terms of who needs who, something to think about: In any transactions, both sides need eachother. Without a buyer, you can't sell. Without someone to buy from, you can't buy. Which direction the cash flows in isn't the whole story. |
Quote:
I already knew that. And yes, on many issues I come across as being pro-US......... because on those issues I am right. Arguments such as international security and what is best for the world in general, or "was the US wrong to drop the bomb on Japan" etc, you bet your lame limping ass I'll speak up for what is right. But step over the fucking line with me and start saying that the Canada-US trade flow is all one-sided, or have a tax-dodging psuedo-American like Kmanrox saying that the US can "do what it wants to Canada" and I will speak up as well, and of course come across as being anti-American. Right. What I am is a realist. Period. If something is right, I will support it. If it is wrong, no matter who is pushing for it, I will denounce it. I supported Bush and the US's decision to go after Saddam, but should Bush ever take his fight to the internet and go after sites like the ones I run or that of my sponsors, I will denounce him on that. Make no mistake about it. It's really not about being pro-US or Anti-anything...... it is about recognizing truth and calling out bullshit when it arises. Don't like it? Tough shit. |
Quote:
:winkwink: Softwood is another issue. Lumber companies in Texas cried over the fact that canadian lumber was far cheaper and in the end, a tariff on canadian lumber was implemented....good example of 'fair trade' first of all.....secondly....let Texas cut away at their lumber, and when they are done, Canada will be ready to sell it's softwood once again...but it will probably be more expensive. ;) |
Quote:
|
Fuck any Anti-American people.
Someone needs to take charge or there is no order, thus the US has taken charge and look at the world. I'm all for the US. I dislike the 'blame canada' shit that's coming about after South Park but what can you do... Needless to say, the enemy is across the Atlantic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lawked:
Quote:
First... news for you - the US has not taken charge of the world, but rest assured, where it "assumes" some charge... sheesh... yea.. look at it - sad shit!! |
Quote:
9/11 compounded the problems that the tech boom bubble burst created. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Second: Yeah there's problems but imagine Pakistan running the world or any eastern country that hates whites. US does run this world. |
best Canada-US trade...
Celine Dion... for nothing, man did canada luck out on that one. |
Quote:
They really don't give a shit about the US and sure ain't indebted to the US. In fact, the rest of the world owns about 50% of US govt bonds and 10% of Wall Street and are getting more tired daily dealing with a totally fucked up economy! As for Pakistan, you "ally"!! Nobody is interested in Pakistan running the world either - much the same as they are not interested in the US running the world. Where do all these inflated ideas come from in the US? Is the education system so bad it produces such crap? Is it because you are just plain stupid? May be because you no nothing whatsover about the next State to you and hence zero about the rest of the world? Tis clear you are totally ignorant - but who taught you all the crap that you keep spouting when you have clearly have no clue what you are talking about? Keep watching CNN and eat some more Big Macs! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
What country are you in? Seems like you don't realize the military might of the US. Ever seen an Aircraft Carrier? Probably not because on 2 countries have em. (US+Britian) The US can almost do whatever it wants right now, it runs the world. Maybe it doesn't matter in your country at the "peasant level" but the important people in your country kiss US ass just like ours does. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:thumbsup |
Quote:
can't really imagine them in front of a computer they've probably got better things to do |
Fletch XXX:
Quote:
|
Quote:
:) |
Fletch XXX:
Quote:
How's things in UK SexySarah? :winkwink: |
Fletch XXX:
Quote:
|
lawked:
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's no big deal, it's an opinion (heh, a correct one at that). :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Rich:
Quote:
|
lawked:
Quote:
TIP: It's kinda embarassing.... |
Quote:
Respectfully you show pride in your country, that's fine... If you don't think the US controls the world, who does? I'm talking all aspects... |
Quote:
You've got a government in Canada as well you know? |
Quote:
Rub one out so you don't have such a hardon for me. What role does the US play in this world? I only see THEM stepping up to the plate for almost everything in this world. They control the world economically and numerous things. Enjoy. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
therefore we are earning much more towards our bottom line per person and i can see us going through some very rough times at first, but we don't have to trade with anyone..we are totally self reliant in terms of all natural resources required to develop a prosperous nation. however the states is unable to produce enough electricity and water for it's own populace, that is why we sell it to you, at a very cheap price..that is where the states has power, but rest assured unless ww3 is what you want, and anyone saying the states can just invade canada should think about how the UN and all other world countries including China would view an attack on Canada anyway to talk about invasion is crazy talk.... now since i really should be kissing your ass as i want to do biz..i will stop my rampage here...lol |
oh..and when i eat at mcdonalds in the staes it costs me about 5-7 dollarsamerican...when i eat at mcdonalds here it costs about 5-7 dollars cdn:1orglaugh
hehe |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
USA's population 280M so we're less than 10 times smaller. And the USA are ranked 2nd in the world in terms of earnings per capita, and Canada is 15th. See: http://www.aneki.com/richest.html |
Quote:
hmmm see i didn't have the stats...but i could swear the us population is higher then 280 i had though somewhere close to 500-560 |
Quote:
so touchy when your bullshit is called out:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Should stick to Yiddish. :321GFY |
Quote:
and debating the effects of a trade war. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Their plan of fiscal responsibility can be spelled out as, "looky here billy, we've got more money than we know how to spend" it had nothing to do with fiscal responsibility. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123