SexEducation.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sexeducation
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jun 2003
    • 7315

    #841
    Originally posted by LadyMischief


    I am not the one pretending that I am qualified to give advice or instruction to other people's children and teenagers about sex education. I think you need to shut the fuck up, because you're immoral, greedy, and fully taking advantage of innocence. You aren't advancing any knowledge at all, because you have none that's relevant. I wish you were in the states so you would be covered by that new law about misleading domains. You deserve to go to jail.
    YA - WAY TO GO PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ...
    Any links to this new law handy?
    BINGO - ....
    NEXT STEP ....

    "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME"

    YEHAAA .... mega ... I did not know about this new law.
    MEGA KEWL ...

    Comment

    • sexeducation
      So Fucking Banned
      • Jun 2003
      • 7315

      #842
      Originally posted by mule

      You can repeat that stupid question as often as you want. The fact that you have no idea what the answer is, speaks for itself.
      Answer it then ...
      yes or no? with a reason...

      Comment

      • LadyMischief
        Orgasms N Such!
        • Sep 2002
        • 18135

        #843
        Originally posted by sexeducation


        YA - WAY TO GO PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ...
        Any links to this new law handy?
        BINGO - ....
        NEXT STEP ....

        "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME"

        YEHAAA .... mega ... I did not know about this new law.
        MEGA KEWL ...
        You are a psychopath who has no place "teaching" children. You're immoral and conniving. You are now also benieth my notice. I hope you go to jail soon, or get hit by a bus, or mauled by wild animals or something. Nobody in the world has earned it more.

        ICQ 3522039
        Content Manager - orgasm.com
        [email protected]

        Comment

        • sexeducation
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jun 2003
          • 7315

          #844
          Originally posted by mule

          You can repeat that stupid question as often as you want. The fact that you have no idea what the answer is, speaks for itself.
          Oh -- you are wrong ...
          I never ask a question that I don't already have the answer to.
          I have an answer - and the proof - to it.
          But no-one else has answered it.

          I have to scoot for 30 minutes ...maybe 45 ...but I will be back...

          CHEERS - PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ..
          yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

          Comment

          • DJRCyberAVS
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2002
            • 493

            #845
            Originally posted by sexeducation


            Oh -- you are wrong ...
            I never ask a question that I don't already have the answer to.
            I have an answer - and the proof - to it.
            But no-one else has answered it.

            Well if you never ask a question you don't already have the answer to, then that makes you a moron. I normally want to better myself by asking questions I don't know the anwsers to otherwise you just go round in circles.... kinda like this thread...

            BTW - It depends on the laws of your country dipshit..... You still think you know it all don't you ?

            PLEASE BAN THE SexED ASSWIT!

            Comment

            • Webby
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Oct 2002
              • 14956

              #846
              sexeducation:

              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              "What qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?"
              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              I have the same qualifications that ALL Mothers & ALL Fathers have.
              OK.. why don't you simply say that you have NO QUALIFICATION?


              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              "Also... What does the education of parents have to do with, for example, images of adults involved in anal sex with children ?"
              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              There are NO images of children having sex on my websites!
              Except for some banners (which the current is being replaced) and swoit.com graphics and some clipart - there are no graphics on my website - at all.
              True.. there are "no images of children having sex on my websites" - NOW!

              BUT THERE *WERE* IMAGES OF ADULTS INVOLVED IN ANAL SEX WITH CHILDREN and related sick imaging on your "website".

              How do I know? Because I have copies of your complete website before it was pulled. It may come as a surprise to you that others have been looking at your website for many months and already have copies of your "content" plus a considerable amount of further related information. There is NO QUESTION that this is CHILD PORN.

              Webby - would SexEducation.com as a UBB board be more acceptable to you?
              You have SERIOUSLY GOT TO BE JOKING!!!
              OR, you just don't get any of the threads that have been posted here. Try reading the follow twice:

              What is "acceptable" to me is totally irrelevant, - I have nothing to do with your "website" and have no qualification - the same as you, - to engage in giving "opinions" in this area.

              SexEducation.com is a totally messed up domain currently the subject of several avenues of inquiry by several law enforcement agencies. These people are in no hurry to speak to you - it's called "research" - there are avenues still partially investigated, and, to use a quote, "Mr 'Beacock' is not going anywhere...".

              Under these circumstances there is little doubt that you would need to raise considerable amounts of cash to pay *anyone* to take control of your "websites". They are not even worth the $10 registration fee. They are totally contaminated.

              Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain?
              Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites. "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.

              Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.

              FINALLY, - YOU HAVE NO QUALIFICATION TO OFFER ANY "OPINONS" EITHER WITHIN THE ADULT INDUSTRY OR RELATED TO SEX EDUCATION. YOU HAVE ALREADY MESSED UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN - IN FACT YOU ARE A LIABILITY.

              Now...
              XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

              Comment

              • LadyMischief
                Orgasms N Such!
                • Sep 2002
                • 18135

                #847
                Webby is my goddess.

                ICQ 3522039
                Content Manager - orgasm.com
                [email protected]

                Comment

                • Webby
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 14956

                  #848
                  LadyMischief:

                  Webby is my goddess.
                  Well... maybe a "God" by some unsuspecting person!

                  But mainly "idiot", "halfwit", "communist", "liberal" and a string of other terms which were pulled to suit the situation!
                  XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                  Comment

                  • sexeducation
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 7315

                    #849
                    Originally posted by Webby
                    [B]sexeducation:



                    Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites.
                    Because no adult webmaster has ever provided a reason to why - "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME" ... including yourself ...

                    EVER!

                    "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.
                    That would be interesting news ...
                    Take this "hamburger flipping" Father to court ...
                    after I admitted I had made mistakes ...that would be the best "news media" event I could imagine ...
                    bring it on ...bring it on ...

                    Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.
                    So GFY now all of a sudden limits what can be discussed here ?


                    FINALLY, - YOU HAVE NO QUALIFICATION TO OFFER ANY "OPINONS" EITHER WITHIN THE ADULT INDUSTRY OR RELATED TO SEX EDUCATION. YOU HAVE ALREADY MESSED UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN - IN FACT YOU ARE A LIABILITY.
                    That's not what common sense says.
                    I defend the rights of women and children - tell that to the judge.
                    Last edited by sexeducation; 07-18-2003, 05:27 PM.

                    Comment

                    • sexeducation
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 7315

                      #850
                      "No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name."

                      John E. Beacock
                      [email protected]
                      1-403-619-2739

                      Comment

                      • CoolE
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 451

                        #851
                        SexEducation certainly is fucked in the head. I'm tempted to write a very long post to try to help him understand that, but instead I just take quiet pleasure in knowing that he won't be around forever. One day he will just stop posting and no one will miss him. ASACP.org, the FBI, Calgary Police Services and the RCMP have all been told about this guy. He thinks he is safe because he has furiously been removing the child porn from his site. But I don't think he understands the concept of a web cache and that the evidence is still there and is well-documented I am sure. He will get his due.

                        Once a child pornographer always a child pornographer SexEducation. You can never be one of us (a legitimate adult website owner) as hard as you try. You are starting to sound desperate in your posts - trying to legitimize yourself. It's getting sad and embarassing for you really.

                        Comment

                        • Webby
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 14956

                          #852
                          sexeducation:

                          Originally posted by Webby
                          [B]sexeducation:

                          Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites.

                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Because no adult webmaster has ever provided a reason to why - "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME" ... including yourself ...
                          No webmaster needs to enter any "discussion" on "reproductive fluids" for the reason "THIS IS NOT ANY LEGAL TERM AND IS NOT A GUIDELINE FOR ANY WEBSITES".

                          I am thinking you are some aborted bodily fluid.


                          [quote]
                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.
                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          That would be interesting news ...
                          [quote]


                          You find this "news"??? You clearly don't even know this has been the method of operation of courts for some centuries now.

                          after I admitted I had made mistakes ...that would be the best "new media" event I could imagine ...
                          bring it on ...bring it on ...
                          Mistakes?? What mistakes would these be????

                          Tell that to the investigation team and the courts - they don't seem to acknowledge some inability or ignorance to comprehend the law. It is either an offense or not. The "mistakes" routine is down to your defence lawyer to use in mitigation of your plea and possibly reducing your sentence.

                          Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.
                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          So GFY now all of a sudden limits what can be discussed here ?
                          If you are asking that the opinions on GFY are of legal value, I'll let you into a well kept secret - they ain't.

                          I defend the rights of women and children - tell that to the judge.
                          That's an odd comment from a PEDO, - but not unusal.
                          I am sure any judge will disappear underneath the bench unconcious when you reveal that stunner.
                          Is that why you are a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER AND THEIF - to "defend the rights of women and children"???

                          Now... once again...
                          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                          Comment

                          • sexeducation
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 7315

                            #853
                            Originally posted by CoolE
                            SexEducation certainly is fucked in the head. I'm tempted to write a very long post to try to help him understand that, but instead I just take quiet pleasure in knowing that he won't be around forever. One day he will just stop posting and no one will miss him. ASACP.org, the FBI, Calgary Police Services and the RCMP have all been told about this guy. He thinks he is safe because he has furiously been removing the child porn from his site. But I don't think he understands the concept of a web cache and that the evidence is still there and is well-documented I am sure. He will get his due.

                            Once a child pornographer always a child pornographer SexEducation. You can never be one of us (a legitimate adult website owner) as hard as you try. You are starting to sound desperate in your posts - trying to legitimize yourself. It's getting sad and embarassing for you really.
                            Keep deflecting the issue ...
                            OR ...
                            answer the question ..

                            Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be immediately shown on any directly accessed domain name?"

                            What is the answer?

                            Comment

                            • Webby
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 14956

                              #854
                              sexeducation:

                              Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be immediately shown on any directly accessed domain name?"

                              What is the answer?

                              OK... NOW IT IS WELL OVERDUE THAT YOU FUCK OFF YOU STUPID PEDO!


                              XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                              Comment

                              • sexeducation
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Jun 2003
                                • 7315

                                #855
                                Originally posted by Webby
                                sexeducation:




                                OK... NOW IT IS WELL OVERDUE THAT YOU FUCK OFF YOU STUPID PEDO!


                                Still "fluff and fodder" ... ANSWER THE QUESTION... !!!

                                Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any directly accessed domain name?

                                Will anyone - within the adult industry answer this one question?

                                Comment

                                Working...