One will identify himself if and when he chooses and the other already has and is a well known member of this board. Do a fucking search dumb "ASS".

Read the post below Clueless.

Can't you ever answer a question?

That is because you are not very bright...Clueless.

Note: In EVERY thread when King starts losing the argument, he always tries to nail you to the wall with his vicious retorts!:1orglaugh

I did.

Quoting yourself and two unnamed sources to prove that you aren't pathfinder makes your answer extremely credible, yes.

You see how he answers questions, so we should not be surprised when he see's nothing wrong in Bush side stepping the truth.

He is lying I do not know anyone here other than him who knew PF, when asked a direct question he gives an indirect answer.

No you did not answer the question. Two reasons;

(1) You are lying.
(2) You are lying.

When you say they knew him, they met him or swapped emails? Or maybe bodily fluids.

I got it theking and PF were lovers in the army together. :1orglaugh

This from an ex soldier, what corp were you in? Catering, Admin or Latrines.

I am not here to prove anything to anyone...I use the board for my amusement...and do not give a fuck if you find any answer I give to any question to be credible. If you are interested use the fucking search feature...I get bored with rehashing the same shit over and over.

FYI Cluless...I was a member of the elite 82nd Aiborne Division...an E-7 Platoon Sgt...Infantry.

Smokescreens don't prove that you aren't pathfinder. If you really get so uptight about no-one believing you, you're gonna have to do better than that.

funkmaster unlike your friend Donald i've said it many times before the war started that we wont find any real WMD weapons in Iraq. And i have supported the war and still do.

the fall of Iraq was to bring major changes to the middle east and we're seeing them right now. Assad is running scared.
Iran is in trouble http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtri...reaking_9.html

Saudies are fighting terrorists inside their own country finally

and we're seeing some progress in Israel

if you cant see the bigger picture i can let you barrow my glasses :)

What makes you think that I get up tight about anything that is said on this board? It is white text on a black background and that is all you or anyone else on this board is.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

The haters of America and/or Bush are blinded by their hatred and/or are just to stupid to see the big picture.

we don't hate and we're not stupid. We know when we're being lied to. If there is a big picture please tell us honestly, we don't want the bullshit. The end justifies the means?.. sure sometimes

theking if you can't see how desperate Rummsfeld, Bush etc were to promote Hussein as a clear and present danger then you just can't read spin at all. You lapped it up, why don't you just admit it? In some ways it'd be nice to live in your innocent world where you can believe what you're told by the Whitehouse (oh no wait they're trying to scare you into following). I'd have thought by your age you'd be a bit more cynical.

Watch my lips dumbness.

We do not hate America, Americans or even Bush.

We hate the fact that he lied to us and continues to do so.

slavdogg
Then why did they not tell us this in the first place or were the French and the Russians the truthful ones?

Plus what right does a US President have to make major changes in a country 10,000 miles away?

Those were some interesting "conclusions" ya posted.

"the fall of Iraq was to bring major changes to the middle east and we're seeing them right now. Assad is running scared."

Running where? Last time I looked he was still firmly in control of Syria and still ruthlessly running the country. That's "running"?
----------
"Iran is in trouble" The students & intellectuals have been protesting for years in Iran..yet the clerics remain firmly in control.
------------
"Saudies are fighting terrorists inside their own country finally"
Royal family doesn't like being made a fool. Arresting a few people is not exactly a large scale crackdown in terrorism.
-----------------------------
"and we're seeing some progress in Israel"
Huh..was it just my imagination that buses are being blown up left & right still and the Israelis are still lobbing missles into the midst of the Palestinians. THAT'S progress??

"if you cant see the bigger picture i can let you barrow my glasses :)" No offense meant..but I think YOU need a new prescription for your eyes so YOU can see the big picture better.

It's actually white text on a grey background.

This does not matter to the "uptight right".
If you DISAGREE with THEIR policies, you are a "hater".
A hater of what though..LIES??

From the state of the union address:
-----------------
The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
------------------

From everything that I've read, that information was completely know by everyone in the administration to be bogus, yet still he spoke it in the State of the Union.

He had ten years to hide his stuff. It's going to take time to find everything. Of course the whiny liberals would like the US population to think otherwise.

That fucking pervasive liberal hegemony at work!

they did, you just didnt listen well enough
The russians and French were after their own self interests


>> Plus what right does a US President have to make major changes in a country 10,000 miles away?

Congress gave him the right, twice !
We were enforcing 18 UN resolutions that Saddam failed to comply with.

Yeah, check out what this whiny liberal said:

Krugman is right to suggest a possible comparison to Watergate. In the three decades since Watergate, this is the first potential scandal I have seen that could make Watergate pale by comparison. If the Bush Administration intentionally manipulated or misrepresented intelligence to get Congress to authorize, and the public to support, military action to take control of Iraq, then that would be a monstrous misdeed.

- John Dean, former Counsel to President Nixon

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030606.html

I have a serious question.

I pasted a Rumsfeld quote earlier in this thread where he stated on March 30th, 2003 that they knew where the weapons were hidden.

Obviously that makes what you said above false.

What I'm curious about is.. what happened when you saw the quote which allowed you to believe that something completely contradictory is true?

Are you a selective amnesiac? Do you not even remember seeing it? Does your brain automatically filter out things you don't want to be true?

Is it at all possible that he could of been bluffing about them. He was definitely bluffing about the size and effectiveness of his army.

My cousin has just returned and said the army he saw was a joke, no working artillery, tanks and most of the solidiers demoralised and ready to run.

Given that situation and with Iran on the border was Saddam bluffing his mighty army and resources?

With a sworn enemy on his doorstep it's possible.

Is it time to enforce the 20 bazillion UN resolutions Israel is in breach of? Please gimme a break, enforcing UN resolutions was the least of the reasons for invading Iraq

And Bush has who's interest at heart? That is the funniest thing on this thread.

Then the UN should have given the go, not Bush. The UN actually said no.

Simple isn't it.

And we've set an example for the world now. As many said about the pre-emptive war idea, it would lead to others adopting the same stance:

EU Backs Possible Use of Force Against WMD Threats
By REUTERS

Filed at 7:23 a.m. ET

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - The European Union, in a significant shift toward U.S. thinking, said Monday the use of force might be necessary where diplomacy failed to address threats from weapons of mass destruction.

EU foreign ministers endorsed a strategy to combat the spread of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons that for the first time included a reference to possible military action against states or terrorist groups that acquired such arms.


``When these measures (including political dialogue and diplomatic pressure) have failed, coercive measures under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter and international law (sanctions, selective or global, interceptions of shipments and, as appropriate, the use of force) could be envisioned,'' it said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/...978593,00.html

Seems like the aussies could se it was " garbage"....

Now, If you WANT to be conviced or WANT to convice somebody otherwise, then you can make beleive it is GOLD mainly if you do not show or doctor the evidence,,,

TheKing, as days goes by, not only the US ( who refused the help of UN specialist ...) don't find even traces of WMD but the world community finds evidence of lies and deceipt.

Obviously, all means were good to this hawk administration to PREVAIL...

The world community is free to find what they think is evidence of lies and deception...but in the US it will be members of Congress that will be the determiners of evidence of lies and deception. Members of the Intelligence Select Committees are reviewing intel reports and if they conclude that lies and/or deception has been committed by the administration there will then be full blown investigations by the House and the Senate.

Good thinking on the part of the "EU foreign ministers".

jimmyf is one of them

Do you not live on Earth? Might is right.

Clueless...would you consider quoting the resolution where the UN said no?

How's about you quoting the resolution where they gave the go-ahead, pathfinder?

I'm puzzled.

Who actually reads theking's posts?

did you know the only two millitary actions the un ever supported in its history were korea and gulf war 1. And korea only passed because the Russians didnt show up to vote that day.


But im sure the 800,000 rhwandans that got killed think the un is neato.

I do. They're hilarious :)