Rather than thinking about sponsors in terms of "which shave and which dont", I think in terms of my conversion stats. I promote sponsors with low conversions 1:<500, and dont promote sponsors with high conversions 1:2000+. Simple.
Originally posted by SomeCreep Rather than thinking about sponsors in terms of "which shave and which dont", I think in terms of my conversion stats. I promote sponsors with low conversions 1:<500, and dont promote sponsors with high conversions 1:2000+. Simple.
Well 1/500 with topbucks is like 1/5000 at ARS.
Remember the different sponsors track hits differently. 1st/2nd/join page clicks etc.
If you said my out clicks show sponsor A at 1/500 and sponsor B at 1/1500 then that would be fair.
Ratio's mean shit unless you are getting the ratio from your own outclick stats.
Originally posted by SomeCreep Rather than thinking about sponsors in terms of "which shave and which dont", I think in terms of my conversion stats. I promote sponsors with low conversions 1:<500, and dont promote sponsors with high conversions 1:2000+. Simple.
I agree 100%
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Send 10,000 hits to a couple programs, compare the bottom line and use the one that makes you the most $$$...that?s it! Ratios, shaving wtf? If you would know that a sponsor shaves but you make with him $1000 and a other program that doesn?t shave makes you $500 on the same traffic, who would you use?
Webmasters are smart and they know where they have to send the traffic to make $$$, a program can?t just shave a huge percentage of sales without losing webmasters?
Comment