![]() |
yes
now post some mpeg that you probably had hidden of a mieorucuilgloeio eating an f50 for lunch :321GFY |
Quote:
I actually wonder myself which car would be quicker around the track, the'd both be pretty close I'd imagine, pretty similar engine & performance specs... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you'll both be owned. :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:Graucho Wrooooooom! *shiver* |
|
hehe how can you compare f-50 to Murcielago ?
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2L V12 580HP ___ VS ___ Ferrari F50 4.7L V12 520HP well.. test by Best Motoring Japanese: Ferrari F50 Total Time = 5'02"029 & Lamborghini Murcielago Total Time = 5'08"307 --------- best laps !!!! Ferrari F50 : 1'38"604 Murcielago: 1'39"795 actually I'm not talking about f-50 GT (bad monster) :Graucho even porshe gt2 can beat Murcielago :winkwink: |
50 Bitches :glugglug
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Vlad, where are you finding these test results? I would like to compare some other cars
|
Quote:
the batmobile doesn't have a radio either |
Quote:
I bet those seets feel so comfortable to sit in.... damn they look sweet! |
A McLaren F1 owns everything posted so far and it comes with a lightweight 6 cd changer.
Boo-yah. |
Quote:
|
|
Now if we could only get TheHun to get his ass here, he'd confirm that the Countach is one stiff, uncomfortable ride.
|
LAMike , well it`s from official jp website http://www.bestmotoring.jp
but if you would like to compare few cars , give a try to www.supercars.net. It`s just a great site for those who really like such toys , message me 32978671 and I will give you a password to platinum membership for free :glugglug |
Quote:
If society still liked their women as curvy as this, imagine how much better the porn would look. Rrrrrowww! |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123