How do you check if content was generated by ChatGPT (OpenAI GPT-3/3.5/4)?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • just a punk
    So fuckin' bored
    • Jun 2003
    • 32393

    #1

    How do you check if content was generated by ChatGPT (OpenAI GPT-3/3.5/4)?

    I've tried these:

    https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
    the results are about this:
    6% likely this comes from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

    https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/
    the results are about this:
    97%
    HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT
    Fantastic!

    https://gptzero.me/
    the results are about this:
    Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human

    https://www.zerogpt.com/
    the results are about this:
    Your Text is Human written
    0%
    AI GPT*

    The problem is that I've been trying to check the content generated by OpenAI GPT 3.5 Turbo for my websites. It is not human-written for sure, so all those results are absolutely wrong.

    Is there any online service that is really able to detect a GPT generated text? Is there something that actually works?
    Obey the Cowgod
  • Rochard
    Jägermeister Test Pilot
    • Dec 2001
    • 75733

    #2
    LOL. If it says "In conclusion" it it most likely written by Chat GPT.
    Herschel Savage
    Brooklyn, NY

    Comment

    • Klen
      • Aug 2006
      • 32235

      #3
      I use zerogpt too, however it does detect most of AI content as AI but not everything so you just happen to get negative result.

      Comment

      • just a punk
        So fuckin' bored
        • Jun 2003
        • 32393

        #4
        Originally posted by Rochard
        LOL. If it says "In conclusion" it it most likely written by Chat GPT.
        With a 6% probability? Nice point, Sherlock

        Originally posted by Klen
        I use zerogpt too, however it does detect most of AI content as AI but not everything so you just happen to get negative result.
        All posts give about the same result. I just ask GPT to write "as a human" and use my plugin's built-in synonymizer, which sometimes replaces "that" and "this" with "the". That's all I actually do, and none of these online checkers are able to detect GPT there...

        Maybe OpenAI has changed something on their side and improved the quality of the generated content. Anyway, it seems that all these GPT checkers are just useless. I'd like to find a working one to play with. Any suggestions?

        P.S. That was checked with Turbo GPT-3.5 model only. As a developer, I have an access to GPT-4 model, but it's too expensive and very slow. So ATM GPT-3.5 is a my favorite.
        Obey the Cowgod

        Comment

        • DrGentle
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2019
          • 32

          #5
          Originally posted by CyberSEO
          Anyway, it seems that all these GPT checkers are just useless.
          I 100% agree with this.
          graphic design — webdesign — NSFW text creator — prompt engineer — loading ■ ■ ■

          Comment

          • Klen
            • Aug 2006
            • 32235

            #6
            Originally posted by CyberSEO
            With a 6% probability? Nice point, Sherlock



            All posts give about the same result. I just ask GPT to write "as a human" and use my plugin's built-in synonymizer, which sometimes replaces "that" and "this" with "the". That's all I actually do, and none of these online checkers are able to detect GPT there...

            Maybe OpenAI has changed something on their side and improved the quality of the generated content. Anyway, it seems that all these GPT checkers are just useless. I'd like to find a working one to play with. Any suggestions?

            P.S. That was checked with Turbo GPT-3.5 model only. As a developer, I have an access to GPT-4 model, but it's too expensive and very slow. So ATM GPT-3.5 is a my favorite.
            You should be happy if it passes as human content lol. Furthermore, I am confident that in the future, AI content will go completely undetected. And also what i noticed, how content that states facts, for example, if you prompt "generate an article about historical facts," will pass as human content.

            Comment

            • just a punk
              So fuckin' bored
              • Jun 2003
              • 32393

              #7
              I also think OpenAI will improve their models to be undetectable. Even now, a proper prompt might pass all those online GPT checkers. Personally, I'd like to get access to the one used by Google, but of course that's an impossible dream.

              Anyway, a simple built-in synchronizer allows anyone to cheat any online checker with ease. DeepL translation of a GPT-generated text and/or the old text spinners from 2010's also work just perfectly. All these methods can be used in a fully automated way, so autoblogging is alive again and now I don't see anything that can stop it.

              Human blog writers and obsolete. Period.

              Obey the Cowgod

              Comment

              • TheLegacy
                SEO & GEO Connoisseur
                • Apr 2003
                • 18078

                #8
                Sad really when you think that a well drafted article by a human with a good command of the English language suddenly can be accused of AI. It's one of the lost arts of our times that was lost in the school system.

                That being said - I haven't found an accurate system that can be relied upon to spot AI generated text - the only way is really knowing the author and ask, "are they really that smart?"

                RobertWarrenSEO.com
                Telegram: @TheLegacy54

                Comment

                • Klen
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 32235

                  #9
                  google just announced how they will publish tools to recognize AI content.

                  Comment

                  • CaptainHowdy
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 94730

                    #10
                    Originally posted by CyberSEO
                    Human blog writers and obsolete. Period.
                    More free time to work on that quirky novel, guys . . .

                    Comment

                    • just a punk
                      So fuckin' bored
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 32393

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Klen
                      google just announced how they will publish tools to recognize AI content.
                      They'll be useless as well
                      Obey the Cowgod

                      Comment

                      • elron
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 1553

                        #12
                        aren't those cheap versions of the Alan turing test from 80 years ago?

                        Comment

                        • emmasexytime
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2015
                          • 4512

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Rochard
                          LOL. If it says "In conclusion" it it most likely written by Chat GPT.
                          Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet!
                          I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in.
                          live camss > How to make a live cam site backlinks > hardlinks.org

                          Comment

                          • Klen
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 32235

                            #14
                            I did another test with following prompt:
                            write a description for meal with following ingredients : Baked chicken gyros in Mexican sauce with cheese, American potatoes

                            First i did chat gpt 3.5 - detected as 100%
                            Then did bing chat which is based on gpt 4 - detected as 66%
                            And finally i changed prompt to "write in style of food critic" then it went to zero.

                            Comment

                            • TheLegacy
                              SEO & GEO Connoisseur
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 18078

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Klen
                              I did another test with following prompt:
                              write a description for meal with following ingredients : Baked chicken gyros in Mexican sauce with cheese, American potatoes

                              First i did chat gpt 3.5 - detected as 100%
                              Then did bing chat which is based on gpt 4 - detected as 66%
                              And finally i changed prompt to "write in style of food critic" then it went to zero.

                              Curious - I don't think readers will care and it does not hurt you SEO wise by Google. In a recent post, Google confirmed that AI-generated content is not against its search engine guidelines

                              https://developers.google.com/search...and-ai-content

                              RobertWarrenSEO.com
                              Telegram: @TheLegacy54

                              Comment

                              • Klen
                                • Aug 2006
                                • 32235

                                #16
                                Originally posted by TheLegacy
                                Curious - I don't think readers will care and it does not hurt you SEO wise by Google. In a recent post, Google confirmed that AI-generated content is not against its search engine guidelines

                                https://developers.google.com/search...and-ai-content
                                There is FB group called "Chatgpt and SEO" and people inside claim how google recognize AI content but bing does not so you still get traffic.

                                Comment

                                • TheLegacy
                                  SEO & GEO Connoisseur
                                  • Apr 2003
                                  • 18078

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Klen
                                  There is FB group called "Chatgpt and SEO" and people inside claim how google recognize AI content but bing does not so you still get traffic.
                                  Search Engine Market Share: According to SimilarWeb

                                  https://www.similarweb.com/engines/

                                  As of April 2023

                                  Google 91.05%
                                  Bing 2.92%
                                  Yahoo 2.87%
                                  Yandex .61%

                                  So - Yes Bing may not but is that really going to hurt your SEO if you use Chatgpt?

                                  RobertWarrenSEO.com
                                  Telegram: @TheLegacy54

                                  Comment

                                  • twinklover
                                    Registered User
                                    • May 2023
                                    • 9

                                    #18
                                    There are things you can do to get the output to bypass detection. If you tell the tool to use certain vocabulary it may do it. But it's possible that you don't need to bother.

                                    Comment

                                    • Klen
                                      • Aug 2006
                                      • 32235

                                      #19
                                      There is another detector but it cost , originality.ai and turnitin. Plus one more tip how to humanize your prompts - tell it to start sentence with words like "i did" , "i loved it" , "i enjoyed it" and voila no ai detector will be ever able to figure out.

                                      Comment

                                      • just a punk
                                        So fuckin' bored
                                        • Jun 2003
                                        • 32393

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Klen
                                        There is FB group called "Chatgpt and SEO" and people inside claim how google recognize AI content but bing does not so you still get traffic.
                                        It really depends on how you use it. If you use it for "evil" like rewriting news or even promoting products from online markets (here I would suggest to use a synonymizer on your GPT-generated content), Google will really cut off your traffic. If you use it for "good" to generate unique content of your own specific topic, Google is okay with it.

                                        I have rewritten the CyberSEO Pro manuals and main site pages with ChatGPT and... its positions in Google SERPs have instantly... improved

                                        Check this out: https://www.cyberseo.net/blog/should...rated-content/
                                        Obey the Cowgod

                                        Comment

                                        Working...