Just saw child porn on TV!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • notjoe
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 5599
    #1

    Just saw child porn on TV!!!

    Ok, so im flipping through channels on the TV when i come across one of those Save-A-Third-World-Person ADS running.

    So, what is the problem you say?

    Well the problem was that it showed a line of people walking down some path and the age of some of the people you see was way under 18.

    I think this is a classic exploitation of naked kids to make the general public feel sorry and help to encourage donations of any kind to feed these "hopeless" naked people + kids.

    I think it is about time the USA Govt Agencies walks into some of these countries and takes the kids away because of child abuse.

    Just my
    Tags: None
    • Morgan
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • May 2002
      • 10520
      #2
      Thats along the same lines as national geographic. not too sure what the deal is but its obvious the main focus is not on that underaged person.
      PornstarPlatinum.com | TransErotica.com

        Comment

        • Joe Sixpack
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jul 2002
          • 3793
          #3
          If their country has oil or other rare/valuable natural resources they can expect to be "liberated" any time now.

            Comment

            • d0se
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2002
              • 1225
              #4
              Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
              If their country has oil or other rare/valuable natural resources they can expect to be "liberated" any time now.
              touche'
              <a href="http://www.swoit.com/_7075fcffae0c1be1a35492ee5bbfaae3/1"><img src="http://www.swoit.com/_7075fcffae0c1be1aab68e286ae87b30/1" border="0" width="120" height="60"></img></a>

                Comment

                • pornJester
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 6138
                  #5
                  Originally posted by notjoe
                  I think it is about time the USA Govt Agencies walks into some of these countries and takes the kids away because of child abuse.
                  What about your Canadian govt?

                  ::editted to add:: And I don't believe being poor is considered child abuse.


                  FreshBucks | Webmaster Vault | GayAW
                  Trusted Names in Adult.
                  ICQ 9157.3698

                    Comment

                    • notjoe
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2002
                      • 5599
                      #6
                      Originally posted by Ganjasaurus
                      Thats along the same lines as national geographic. not too sure what the deal is but its obvious the main focus is not on that underaged person.
                      I see, so moms and dads taking keepsake pictures of their children is not ok and warrents walmart employees calling the police and yet broadcasting of naked kids on tv is ok.

                      Interesting.

                        Comment

                        • notjoe
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2002
                          • 5599
                          #7
                          Originally posted by pornJester


                          What about your Canadian govt?

                          ::editted to add:: And I don't believe being poor is considered child abuse.
                          I've never heard about anyone ever getting arrested/questioned for bringing in baby pictures to get printed up here in Canada

                            Comment

                            • Lane
                              Will code for food...
                              • Apr 2001
                              • 8496
                              #8
                              i miss the part where it is porn

                                Comment

                                • notjoe
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2002
                                  • 5599
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by Lane
                                  i miss the part where it is porn

                                  Me too but since Govt considers just about every innocent picture of childhood memories child porn if the kid is naked i figured that this would be the same thing for all intent and purposes.

                                    Comment

                                    • pornJester
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2001
                                      • 6138
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by notjoe


                                      I've never heard about anyone ever getting arrested/questioned for bringing in baby pictures to get printed up here in Canada
                                      You never made any reference to anything about printing baby pictures in your first post.


                                      FreshBucks | Webmaster Vault | GayAW
                                      Trusted Names in Adult.
                                      ICQ 9157.3698

                                        Comment

                                        • Interlude
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Feb 2001
                                          • 1147
                                          #11
                                          It's only porn if you got sexually aroused. You didn't, did you? DID YOU?

                                            Comment

                                            Previous template Next
                                            Working...