Check this out - it looks good!
Ghostbusters 3 is a horror movie not a comedy
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Looks really good, I'm pumped for it.
I must be one of the only people who felt it was good in its own right.
Or are people hating on it because it's an all female cast and came out at the height of feminism?
Comment
-
I saw it. It had some good moments.I thought. It wasn't a laugh riot but it was ok. I didn't understand the hate towards it either.Comment
-
The 2016 remake was the horror show. If anyone found that cast and those "jokes" funny then you really need to check to see if you have a sense of humor.My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold
Over 90 paysites to promote!
Now on Teams: peabodymediaComment
-
Comment
-
-
Isn't it the 5th ghostbusters movie?Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Still looks good!!!!
Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995
Affiliate Support: Chaturbate | CCBill Live
Comment
-
G2 is poorly written because they forced a political agenda. When story takes back seat to politics usually there are issues with quality.
Imagine if the NFL or NBA was forced to hire white players to fill a quotaComment
-
What political agenda was forced? I never thought of politics when watching any of the Ghostbusters.
Comment
-
script and casting
74%
TOMATOMETER
Total Count: 376 critics loved it because it was politically correct with politically correct actors
50%
AUDIENCE SCORE
User Ratings: 119,154 audience didn't much care for it because it was forced scripting and casting to push an agenda.
what did you think of chapels sticks and stones?Comment
-
The only one that seems to be pushing an agenda here is you. You can't even copy and paste from Rotten Tomatoes page about the movie with ad-libbing your own agenda into the results.script and casting
74%
TOMATOMETER
Total Count: 376 critics loved it because it was politically correct with politically correct actors
50%
AUDIENCE SCORE
User Ratings: 119,154 audience didn't much care for it because it was forced scripting and casting to push an agenda.
what did you think of chapels sticks and stones?

Seems to me that overall the movie was liked by critics, but users are split down the middle.
Comment
-
you like dave chappell's, stick and stones?The only one that seems to be pushing an agenda here is you. You can't even copy and paste from Rotten Tomatoes page about the movie with ad-libbing your own agenda into the results.

Seems to me that overall the movie was liked by critics, but users are split down the middle.
DAVE CHAPPELLE: STICKS & STONES
Critics Consensus
Edgy, but empty, Sticks and Stones won't break any bones, but it won't elicit many laughs, either.
35%
TOMATOMETER
Total Count: 17
99%
AUDIENCE SCORE
User Ratings: 39,757
get it now???Comment
-
I still see no agenda in that either... What point are you trying to make here? That critics are out of touch with the majority of people's likes and dislikes? Absolutely. Been that way for decades.you like dave chappell's, stick and stones?
DAVE CHAPPELLE: STICKS & STONES
Critics Consensus
Edgy, but empty, Sticks and Stones won't break any bones, but it won't elicit many laughs, either.
35%
TOMATOMETER
Total Count: 17
99%
AUDIENCE SCORE
User Ratings: 39,757
get it now???
Where's this agenda thing you're talking about though?
Comment
-
script and casting
74%
TOMATOMETER
Total Count: 376 critics loved it because it was politically correct with politically correct actors
50%
AUDIENCE SCORE
User Ratings: 119,154 audience didn't much care for it because it was forced scripting and casting to push an agenda.
what did you think of chapels sticks and stones?
those are paid critics IMO...what surprises me is the 50% score for that absolutely horrid movie...I would have to smoke all the marijuana to make it through that movie...
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
-




Comment