I've wondered why too. All these fucking nutters, if they're caught alive, they're locked up and you never hear about them again. You never know the basic question, such as why the fuck would those assholes do such a thing?
I say put each captured shooter in a room, handcuffed to a chair. And give each victim's family members 5 minutes alone with him, no questioned asked. Maybe then, any future nutcases who might be running around loose out there somewhere will have second thoughts about doing shit like this. Enough is enough.
social media and bullying. When I was a kid the bullying stopped when school was over but today kids are bullied 24/7 online.
Also, parents need to have the right to spank their kids. Kids that grow up to be taught right from wrong will grow up stronger. Not talking about beatings or anything, just strong rules.
I also believe kids should only have flip phones until they are 17 or 18. Was going to say 16 but don't want them texting and driving.
None of these reasons explains why teen suicide has doubled in the past 15 years. It's all related. Ever heard the term nothing is more dangerous than a man with nothing to lose? I would not want to be a teen growing up today. Our culture and media worships and has become obsessed with wealth and beauty like never before. 30 years ago people like Kim Kardashian would have been a three times divorced bar slut on welfare, now they're rewarded. An average looking kid used to be able to attract average looking girls, but now even the ugliest of girls posts their ugly fat asses on facebook and you have 50 morons telling them how gorgeous they are giving them a false sense of reality and leaving them to believe they are some kind of beauty queens only deserving the best.
Then you have the fact that hard work used to be admired but now it is looked down upon to the point a decent blue collar job will not even pay the rent. If you are not born into a good situation your only option to look forward to is 100k in student loan debt with no guarantees. Then you have climate change. It's all pretty fucking depressing.
Throw in easy access to guns, the fact that they have grown up seeing over 10,000 murders on TV, video games, rap and you have a recipe for disaster.
"When men start talking about how they will massacre people because women won’t have sex with them...that’s about wanting to control and subjugate women"
"Numerous men seem to feel that having as much sex as Hugh Hefner is an essential part of the American Dream that ought not be denied to them"
Central to the incel ideology is the idea that sex with another person — specifically, penetrative sex with women — isn’t a privilege for men, but a right. Incels talk about sex with "Stacys," their term for attractive women, the way that more reasonable people talk about food, water, and shelter: as a basic necessity for survival. As a thing without which a man will suffer to an unacceptable degree. And they’re not just sad about their failure to sleep with "Stacys," they're angry about it.
After all, the inverse of this idea is that women, in turn, have a duty to provide sex — and that women who don’t have sex with a particular man are doing that man unjust harm.
The idea that men are entitled to sex, and that women owe it to them, was first plucked from the incel community after the Toronto attack by Robin Hanson, an economist at George Mason University, who took to Twitter and to his personal blog to advocate for a "redistribution" of sex. A central claim of incels is that attractive men, whom they call "Chads," sleep with too many women, and that women should be taken from the Chads and given to the incels to make this more fair. "Those w/ less access to sex plausibly suffer similarly to those with low income, & might similarly hope to organize to lobby for redistribution along this axis," Hansen wrote. The rights and desires of women who would be "redistributed" in this scenario aren’t thought of much at all.
The idea that individual men might have a right to sex the way that they have a right to safety and survival was then taken up by Douthat. He wrote that the suffering of incels who can't get laid might one day be seen as a moral obligation for women.
social media and bullying. When I was a kid the bullying stopped when school was over but today kids are bullied 24/7 online.
Also, parents need to have the right to spank their kids. Kids that grow up to be taught right from wrong will grow up stronger. Not talking about beatings or anything, just strong rules.
I also believe kids should only have flip phones until they are 17 or 18. Was going to say 16 but don't want them texting and driving.
You take care of a bully by belting him in the mouth. - Simple formula, bust his face and he'll stop his bullshit. Until a kid does that the bull will just keep coming at him
In my day we disciplined our kids and told everyone to mind their own fucking business. Seems to me that people are just scared idiots worrying about what might happen to them if they behave like good parents.
I've come to believe that we should be putting our kids in the military when they're 16 and don't let them leave it until their 25. Again it comes back to making them tough and giving them strong discipline.
I hate to say it but everything seems to come back to people being weak.
officially retired as of March 01 2018 but still fucking around and getting into shit.
"When men start talking about how they will massacre people because women won’t have sex with them...that’s about wanting to control and subjugate women"
"Numerous men seem to feel that having as much sex as Hugh Hefner is an essential part of the American Dream that ought not be denied to them"
Central to the incel ideology is the idea that sex with another person — specifically, penetrative sex with women — isn’t a privilege for men, but a right. Incels talk about sex with "Stacys," their term for attractive women, the way that more reasonable people talk about food, water, and shelter: as a basic necessity for survival. As a thing without which a man will suffer to an unacceptable degree. And they’re not just sad about their failure to sleep with "Stacys," they're angry about it.
After all, the inverse of this idea is that women, in turn, have a duty to provide sex — and that women who don’t have sex with a particular man are doing that man unjust harm.
The idea that men are entitled to sex, and that women owe it to them, was first plucked from the incel community after the Toronto attack by Robin Hanson, an economist at George Mason University, who took to Twitter and to his personal blog to advocate for a "redistribution" of sex. A central claim of incels is that attractive men, whom they call "Chads," sleep with too many women, and that women should be taken from the Chads and given to the incels to make this more fair. "Those w/ less access to sex plausibly suffer similarly to those with low income, & might similarly hope to organize to lobby for redistribution along this axis," Hansen wrote. The rights and desires of women who would be "redistributed" in this scenario aren’t thought of much at all.
The idea that individual men might have a right to sex the way that they have a right to safety and survival was then taken up by Douthat. He wrote that the suffering of incels who can't get laid might one day be seen as a moral obligation for women.
If a guy is not having sex with the girls he wants to have sex with...or none at all, then he needs to become the man that girls want to have sex with. So sorry to them but that's the way the game is played. It's a biological law which has existed since the first dick entered the first pussy.
Comment