Xvideos decline in views

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RycEric
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2009
    • 1313

    #16
    https://transparencyreport.google.co...ns/xvideos.com

    Mindgeek seems to be hitting them hard with notices but Google is not honoring. That's interesting because when you hit Mindgeek with Google notices, they sic MSK on you.
    So now they seem to be in predatory mode using the DMCA "as a weapon"... as they themselves would say when done against them.

    Comment

    • ZENRA
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2016
      • 655

      #17
      Originally posted by Father_of_HereIsThePorn
      Xvideos now have a release limit on clips per day, fair enough.

      Still, I've noticed that the number of views that my clips are receiving has dropped significantly. Is it just me, or are you also experiencing the same drop?
      Are you referring to the view count per movie or the overall views for your account?

      The latter (shown in the graph on their global uploads page) had some technical issues for awhile resulting in drastically lower reported numbers. Seems like it was resolved a week or two ago.
      ZENRA | Subtitled Japanese AV | @ZENRAMANIAC
      JAV VR Content Manager at SexLikeReal

      Comment

      • Bladewire
        StraightBro
        • Aug 2003
        • 56228

        #18
        Originally posted by RycEric
        https://transparencyreport.google.co...ns/xvideos.com

        Mindgeek seems to be hitting them hard with notices but Google is not honoring. That's interesting because when you hit Mindgeek with Google notices, they sic MSK on you.
        So now they seem to be in predatory mode using the DMCA "as a weapon"... as they themselves would say when done against them.
        MSK? That's a new one for me I think. Who are they?

        Oh! Their attorneys Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp LLP.

        They also use Thorpe Shwer, P.C.


        Skype: CallTomNow

        Comment

        • CaptainHowdy
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2004
          • 94725

          #19
          Originally posted by Bladewire
          What's your point?
          My bad . . .

          Originally posted by lezinterracial
          "Give them something they have never seen before" is getting more difficult.
          https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.p...h5b39ec41b812d

          Comment

          • RycEric
            Confirmed User
            • Apr 2009
            • 1313

            #20
            Originally posted by Bladewire
            MSK? That's a new one for me I think. Who are they?

            Oh! Their attorneys Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp LLP.

            They also use Thorpe Shwer, P.C.
            Nailed it

            Comment

            • notinmybackyard
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2012
              • 3230

              #21
              Originally posted by lezinterracial
              "Give them something they have never seen before" is getting more difficult.
              I have to disagree.

              Also, the consumer is just getting fed up with tube sites and they want their porn delivered in a different media format.
              officially retired as of March 01 2018 but still fucking around and getting into shit.

              Comment

              • King Mark
                So Fucking Banned
                • Aug 2016
                • 27033

                #22
                ^yeah aight

                Comment

                • CaptainHowdy
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 94725

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Dead Eye
                  ^yeah aight
                  You are on a circumflex mood today . . .

                  Comment

                  • King Mark
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Aug 2016
                    • 27033

                    #24
                    Hold on, I gotta google that

                    Comment

                    • King Mark
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Aug 2016
                      • 27033

                      #25
                      I'm not sure how that word reflects my mood, but consumers love the convenience of tubes.

                      Comment

                      • Bladewire
                        StraightBro
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 56228

                        #26
                        Originally posted by RycEric
                        Nailed it
                        BTW, don't make the same mistake Fratmen.Tv pornographer John Marsh did when suing MindGeek in federal court. His mistake led to over a year of delays in his case because he sued the wrong entity

                        MindGeek's correct entities to sue are MG Billing US, MindGeek USA, Inc. Corporate Parent MindGeek S.a.r.l. as you can see in the filing referenced in the above link.

                        But

                        During the same time last year, in this federal lawsuit, MindGeek identifies as MINDGEEK USA, INC., D/B/A PORNHUB.COM identifying MG HOLDINGS USA CORP. as Corporate Parent.


                        Skype: CallTomNow

                        Comment

                        • CaptainHowdy
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 94725

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Dead Eye
                          I'm not sure how that word reflects my mood, but consumers love the convenience of tubes.
                          ^ <- Circumflex.

                          Comment

                          • notinmybackyard
                            Confirmed User
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 3230

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Dead Eye
                            ^yeah aight
                            I'll toss you a bone and don't ever complain that I never give anyone some advice without charging for it.

                            1.
                            Find yourself an 80-year-old woman that spent too much time in the sun. Then get yourself a young tranny with a schlong the size of king kong.

                            2.
                            Next film the old woman wearing torn and stained granny panties and have her take out her false teeth and wash them in the kitchen sink. Then make her walk over to the table and start eating a bowl of lasagna without putting her teeth in her mouth. (Best if you put them on the table next to the food for the sake of imagery)

                            3.
                            Now get the fairy to come in wearing a dress and with bug eyes like he's stoned. He lifts up his dress and proclaims that he's a lesbian and really needs someone to suck his overgrown clitoris and play with his balls.

                            4.
                            Hopefully, the she-male can not get it hard so the old woman gets angry and starts trying to fuck it in the ass with some sort of kitchen utensil.

                            5.
                            The lasagna should go flying across the room and make a royal mess to close the scene.

                            Film that and figure out how to get it to the consumer and you'll make serious money.
                            officially retired as of March 01 2018 but still fucking around and getting into shit.

                            Comment

                            • RycEric
                              Confirmed User
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 1313

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Bladewire
                              BTW, don't make the same mistake Fratmen.Tv pornographer John Marsh did when suing MindGeek in federal court. His mistake led to over a year of delays in his case because he sued the wrong entity

                              MindGeek's correct entities to sue are MG Billing US, MindGeek USA, Inc. Corporate Parent MindGeek S.a.r.l. as you can see in the filing referenced in the above link.

                              But

                              During the same time last year, in this federal lawsuit, MindGeek identifies as MINDGEEK USA, INC., D/B/A PORNHUB.COM identifying MG HOLDINGS USA CORP. as Corporate Parent.
                              Fun stuff.. especially a year in delays. Jesus

                              Comment

                              • King Mark
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Aug 2016
                                • 27033

                                #30
                                Originally posted by CaptainHowdy
                                ^ <- Circumflex.
                                Ahh,ok. I get it now.

                                I do that mostly to avoid quoting while letting the person above know the reply is for them. It's turned into a habit now tho.

                                Comment

                                Working...