AOC tax robots 90% and no one has to work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • onwebcam
    Fake Nick 1.0
    • Oct 2005
    • 27689

    #1

    AOC tax robots 90% and no one has to work

    The core of our problem is we aren't taxing robots enough

    https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/sta...15221217026049


    PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
    ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
  • Bladewire
    StraightBro
    • Aug 2003
    • 56228

    #2
    Nobody said that you copy paste queen


    Skype: CallTomNow

    Comment

    • gorillaz_
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2014
      • 361

      #3
      this woman is so ugly ...

      Comment

      • thommy
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2003
        • 5469

        #4
        Originally posted by onwebcam
        The core of our problem is we aren't taxing robots enough

        https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/sta...15221217026049


        this is actually the one and only way to look into some kind of future where people will be replaced from robots.

        the other alternative is that they OWN them and rent them.

        it is kind of a social and accepted slavery - mankind just did not think about this part because humans are technically further than mentally.

        somehow we're trying to force our way into a society we've technically overtaken for a long time.
        Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
        www.trafficfabrik.com

        Comment

        • pimpmaster9000
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2011
          • 26732

          #5
          She is right...automation is taking away your customers jobs like nothing else...it is cutting the branch you are sitting on...
          Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

          Comment

          • Bladewire
            StraightBro
            • Aug 2003
            • 56228

            #6
            Originally posted by thommy
            this is actually the one and only way to look into some kind of future where people will be replaced from robots.
            Yes but not 90%

            He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"


            Skype: CallTomNow

            Comment

            • imabro
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2007
              • 871

              #7
              Originally posted by Bladewire
              Yes but not 90%

              He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"
              Like you have any room to talk. You constantly lie.

              Comment

              • thommy
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2003
                • 5469

                #8
                Originally posted by Bladewire
                Yes but not 90%

                He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"
                why not 90% ???

                you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
                the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

                a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
                and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

                it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

                do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

                what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

                the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
                if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
                Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                www.trafficfabrik.com

                Comment

                • onwebcam
                  Fake Nick 1.0
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 27689

                  #9
                  Originally posted by thommy
                  why not 90% ???

                  you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
                  the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

                  a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
                  and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

                  it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

                  do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

                  what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

                  the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
                  if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
                  I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)
                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                  Comment

                  • Bladewire
                    StraightBro
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 56228

                    #10
                    Originally posted by thommy
                    why not 90% ???

                    you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
                    the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

                    a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
                    and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

                    it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

                    do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

                    what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

                    the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
                    if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
                    He falsely claimed that AOC was for taxing robots so "no one has to work". That was my point, he's lying about her saying that.

                    Literally every thread Wehateporn has posted is an easily disproved lie. His threads are trash on GFY.

                    Blocked alt-right hate fake nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1...


                    Skype: CallTomNow

                    Comment

                    • tfto
                      GFY and your feelings.
                      • Sep 2001
                      • 2121

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Bladewire
                      He falsely claimed that AOC was for taxing robots so "no one has to work". That was my point, he's lying about her saying that.

                      Literally every thread Wehateporn has posted is an easily disproved lie. His threads are trash on GFY
                      You pretty much summed up your posting history.

                      Bladelier will come in, edit his post and then say some bullshit about a fake nic in 3...2...1...

                      Comment

                      • Bladewire
                        StraightBro
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 56228

                        #12
                        ↑↑↑ I was right again!


                        Skype: CallTomNow

                        Comment

                        • Bladewire
                          StraightBro
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 56228

                          #13
                          Originally posted by crucifissio
                          She is right...automation is taking away your customers jobs like nothing else...it is cutting the branch you are sitting on...
                          They've been saying this for a hundred years

                          Blocked alt-right hate fake nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1...

                          No impulse control is part of it's disability


                          Skype: CallTomNow

                          Comment

                          • tfto
                            GFY and your feelings.
                            • Sep 2001
                            • 2121

                            #14
                            Will you look at that. Bladelier did come in, edit his posts and went with his fake nic bullshit once again. The loser is as predictable as yesterdays weather.

                            Don't be surprised if his fake nic's come in and post below. It's part of Bladelier Media's Standard Operation Procedure.

                            Comment

                            • thommy
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 5469

                              #15
                              Originally posted by onwebcam
                              I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)
                              i did really not expect that you understand the point.

                              ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.

                              everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.
                              Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                              www.trafficfabrik.com

                              Comment

                              • Bladewire
                                StraightBro
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 56228

                                #16
                                ↑↑↑ Truth


                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                Comment

                                • onwebcam
                                  Fake Nick 1.0
                                  • Oct 2005
                                  • 27689

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by thommy
                                  i did really not expect that you understand the point.

                                  ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.

                                  everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.
                                  Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.

                                  You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you
                                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                  Comment

                                  • Idigmygirls
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jan 2007
                                    • 498

                                    #18
                                    I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

                                    In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

                                    1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

                                    2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
                                    Red Light Center - Adult Metaverse
                                    https://www.redlightcenter.com

                                    Comment

                                    • thommy
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jun 2003
                                      • 5469

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Idigmygirls
                                      I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

                                      In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

                                      1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

                                      2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
                                      absolutely correct but don´t try to explain that to the brain bonsais.
                                      they think that businesses will survive from sales made by higher credit card limits and not by income.
                                      Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                                      www.trafficfabrik.com

                                      Comment

                                      • thommy
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jun 2003
                                        • 5469

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by onwebcam

                                        You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me..
                                        I think you would be the one that would cry after find out that you have to work a month without break to pay ONE HOUR of my work.

                                        i don´t know what you are doing and why you think you are the representative of the smart and successful but all what I can read from you shows me perfectly that you are eating your own fingernails for dinner.
                                        Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                                        www.trafficfabrik.com

                                        Comment

                                        • Paul Markham
                                          Too old to care
                                          • Jun 2001
                                          • 52942

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by onwebcam
                                          Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.

                                          You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you
                                          Wage earners are not only consumers, they are also tax payers. They pay the most in taxes. So as robots take the jobs of consumers, who will pay the taxes that fund governments to pay for the thing you rely on to make your job possible?



                                          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                          Comment

                                          • Paul Markham
                                            Too old to care
                                            • Jun 2001
                                            • 52942

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Idigmygirls
                                            I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

                                            In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

                                            1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

                                            2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
                                            Add tax payers who pay for things like healthcare, unemployment, social programs, police, prisons, defence, roads, internet, etc.

                                            People like onwebcam have a very blinkered outlook to what makes the world go around.

                                            But it's nice to see Thommy change his attitude towards his vision of a future dominated by robots.



                                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                            Comment

                                            Working...