He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"
why not 90% ???
you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.
a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.
it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.
do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.
what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.
the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.
a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.
it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.
do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.
what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.
the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.
a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.
it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.
do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.
what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.
the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.
He falsely claimed that AOC was for taxing robots so "no one has to work". That was my point, he's lying about her saying that.
Literally every thread Wehateporn has posted is an easily disproved lie. His threads are trash on GFY.
Blocked alt-right hate fake nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1...
Will you look at that. Bladelier did come in, edit his posts and went with his fake nic bullshit once again. The loser is as predictable as yesterdays weather.
Don't be surprised if his fake nic's come in and post below. It's part of Bladelier Media's Standard Operation Procedure.
I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)
i did really not expect that you understand the point.
ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.
everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.
i did really not expect that you understand the point.
ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.
everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.
Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.
You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."
In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:
1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or
2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."
In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:
1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or
2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
absolutely correct but don´t try to explain that to the brain bonsais.
they think that businesses will survive from sales made by higher credit card limits and not by income.
You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me..
I think you would be the one that would cry after find out that you have to work a month without break to pay ONE HOUR of my work.
i don´t know what you are doing and why you think you are the representative of the smart and successful but all what I can read from you shows me perfectly that you are eating your own fingernails for dinner.
Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.
You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you
Wage earners are not only consumers, they are also tax payers. They pay the most in taxes. So as robots take the jobs of consumers, who will pay the taxes that fund governments to pay for the thing you rely on to make your job possible?
I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."
In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:
1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or
2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...
Add tax payers who pay for things like healthcare, unemployment, social programs, police, prisons, defence, roads, internet, etc.
People like onwebcam have a very blinkered outlook to what makes the world go around.
But it's nice to see Thommy change his attitude towards his vision of a future dominated by robots.
Comment