Trump wants 5G 'and even 6G' in US as soon as possible

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VRPdommy
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2014
    • 13000

    #1

    Trump wants 5G 'and even 6G' in US as soon as possible

    Interesting...

    I wonder if anyone has told him the reason we are behind the curve is because there is little competition because of all the mergers the last 20 years.
    There are twice the number of carriers in contry's less than the size of Texas.
    We seen it with all forms of media.
    Newspapers, radio, tv, cable, cellular and now even online video (remains to be seen).

    Sprint and T-mobile pale in compare to AT&T and Verizon.
    Every merger is a manipulation of markets even if you can't see it. But you pay for it in price and lack of innovation.


    https://thehill.com/policy/technolog...on-as-possible

    My guess is some company(s) wants him to eliminate FCC rules to speed and cheapen the process up of deployment or just the normal tax breaks.
    BTW... the carriers have yet to deploy the 'top speeds' of LTE yet !
  • OneHungLo
    So Fucking Banned
    • May 2001
    • 40906

    #2
    Damn you BlUmPH!! it's all your fault!!!!!

    Comment

    • beerptrol
      Confirmed Asshole
      • Feb 2003
      • 12722

      #3
      My first thought is he wants to eliminate fcc rules and give more tax breaks to big business so they can buy back stocks, I mean invest in 6g
      “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
      -- Ulysses S. Grant

      Comment

      • bloggerz
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Dec 2006
        • 16255

        #4
        I already get 5G here in the USA
        I SELL ADULT BACKLINKS! Email: eroticweb>gmail SKYPE: gfybloggerz

        $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

        Comment

        • datingbanking
          cuckdollars.com
          • Sep 2014
          • 788

          #5
          Bah, In Russia we have 7g already

          (yes I am waiting to be trolled)

          Comment

          • thommy
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2003
            • 5469

            #6
            Originally posted by VRPdommy
            Interesting...

            I wonder if anyone has told him the reason we are behind the curve is because there is little competition because of all the mergers the last 20 years.
            There are twice the number of carriers in contry's less than the size of Texas.
            We seen it with all forms of media.
            Newspapers, radio, tv, cable, cellular and now even online video (remains to be seen).

            Sprint and T-mobile pale in compare to AT&T and Verizon.
            Every merger is a manipulation of markets even if you can't see it. But you pay for it in price and lack of innovation.


            https://thehill.com/policy/technolog...on-as-possible

            My guess is some company(s) wants him to eliminate FCC rules to speed and cheapen the process up of deployment or just the normal tax breaks.
            BTW... the carriers have yet to deploy the 'top speeds' of LTE yet !

            i am sure his supporters will praise him for it......but
            what the fuck is is 6 G ????
            Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
            www.trafficfabrik.com

            Comment

            • VRPdommy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Oct 2014
              • 13000

              #7
              Originally posted by thommy
              i am sure his supporters will praise him for it......but
              what the fuck is is 6 G ????
              Beats me. We don't really have a 5G Standard yet.
              that was part of the delay. The industry had to agree on specs.
              But they are moving ahead on the premise of a standard.

              It will mean a whole bunch of new lower profile towers will need to go up.
              Considering the 'RF Environmental Impact' studies that need to be preformed in a standard that was implemented 15 years ago, I'll bet that is what they want removed.
              You are looking at 3x the towers in the same space to make it work.
              The 'cell size' (footprint) will be much smaller per tower because there is still only so much frequency bandwidth.

              But I don't know why trump went out of his way to speak of it except there is a play in motion.

              Comment

              • Acepimp
                All Facts Matter
                • Jan 2012
                • 20313

                #8


                This tech is bad. Everyone knows it's bad. Rather point out that it's bad, Trump will promote it. All the haters will then research it and see that it's bad, and they will call for the tech to be banned. It's a brilliant move on his part.

                California city blocks deployment of cancer causing 5G infrastructure

                The California city of Mill Valley is one of the first to successfully block deployment of any and all 5G infrastructure after the city council voted unanimously against the flawed technology which can cause serious health effects to humans and animals including cancer.

                From TechCruch.com:

                Through an urgency ordinance, which allows the city council to immediately enact regulations that affect the health and safety of the community, the restrictions and prohibitions will be put into force immediately for all future applications to site 5G telecommunications equipment in the city. Applications for commercial districts are permitted under the passed ordinance.

                The ordinance was driven by community concerns over the health effects of 5G wireless antennas. According to the city, it received 145 pieces of correspondence from citizens voicing opposition to the technology, compared to just five letters in support of it — a ratio of 29 to 1. While that may not sound like much, the city’s population is roughly 14,000, indicating that about 1% of the population had voiced an opinion on the matter.
                Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

                Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

                Chat with live Streamate Camgirls

                Comment

                • VRPdommy
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 13000

                  #9
                  It remains to be seen if this lower power wide spectrum RF has on health impact.
                  There are good and bad cases to be made on both sides.
                  Nobody has really studied this specific case scenerio.
                  I do know quite a bit about it and whereas a single signal at those levels may be borderline safe, you will not just be playing with one signal.
                  It's 64+ channels per tower (in metro) and those towers are closer to your home and children.

                  I would not argue for or against but I would say it should be studied.
                  It's not one of those things you can go back and make right.

                  Cell Co's are more interested in competing with cable co's.
                  And they are going to start showing off some pretty cool stuff like 4k tv and 4k vr though cellular networking. It does not mean they have done their homework as usual.

                  5G specs are not set in stone yet so there is time to restructure it to be 'safer'.
                  The US does not have to follow the use as in Taiwan etc, they can make their own standard. But the manufacturers may not like that.

                  Comment

                  • BaldBastard
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 16815

                    #10
                    Heres the time line folks:

                    "China Tower, a company that builds infrastructure for the country’s mobile operators, has said it can cover China with 5G within three years of the government’s allocation of spectrum. That points to national coverage by 2023."

                    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/6...what-it-means/

                    You don't have the same in 4 years, China starts outpacing you in every industry.

                    personally I'd much rather the Chinese were spying on me, than the USA/ UK/ Australian, Murdoch run deep states.

                    Comment

                    • aimike
                      Confirmed User
                      • Apr 2017
                      • 558

                      #11
                      who cares

                      Get Custom Adult Website Design

                      Comment

                      • BaldBastard
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Jan 2001
                        • 16815

                        #12
                        Originally posted by aimike
                        who cares
                        The future cares

                        Comment

                        • VRPdommy
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 13000

                          #13
                          I might retract my comments as to the reason trump was talking 5G +...

                          Thinking now his cell service / cell phone got slow from all those hacks into it !

                          He has a government provided secured phone and insists on using his own unsecured phone. Probably because Putin told him to.

                          Comment

                          • thommy
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 5469

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Acepimp


                            This tech is bad. Everyone knows it's bad. Rather point out that it's bad, Trump will promote it. All the haters will then research it and see that it's bad, and they will call for the tech to be banned. It's a brilliant move on his part.



                            loooool - if you are not brainwashed - who than ?

                            but as you are so smart in your emperors thoughts please enlighten us what 6G is.
                            is this the new secret technology only for trump supporters ?
                            Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                            www.trafficfabrik.com

                            Comment

                            • TheSquealer
                              Mayor of Thneedville
                              • Oct 2004
                              • 26178

                              #15
                              Originally posted by thommy
                              loooool - if you are not brainwashed - who than ?

                              but as you are so smart in your emperors thoughts please enlighten us what 6G is.
                              is this the new secret technology only for trump supporters ?
                              if only there was some way to find the answer to a question. like a smart computer. or a bunch of computers connected together. maybe some way to go to that computer and find the answer.

                              maybe,... someday.

                              .
                              Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

                              Rochard

                              Comment

                              • Bladewire
                                StraightBro
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 56228

                                #16
                                Originally posted by MrBaldBastard
                                Heres the time line folks:

                                "China Tower, a company that builds infrastructure for the country’s mobile operators, has said it can cover China with 5G within three years of the government’s allocation of spectrum. That points to national coverage by 2023."

                                https://www.technologyreview.com/s/6...what-it-means/

                                You don't have the same in 4 years, China starts outpacing you in every industry.

                                personally I'd much rather the Chinese were spying on me, than the USA/ UK/ Australian, Murdoch run deep states.
                                That's all talk. If they do it I'd be impressed


                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                Comment

                                • Bladewire
                                  StraightBro
                                  • Aug 2003
                                  • 56228

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by thommy
                                  loooool - if you are not brainwashed - who than ?

                                  but as you are so smart in your emperors thoughts please enlighten us what 6G is.
                                  is this the new secret technology only for trump supporters ?
                                  Chump is so clueless


                                  Skype: CallTomNow

                                  Comment

                                  Working...