And they still surf sites with popups so....

Yeah, they'll be able to with Chrome because Chrome will block all the ads on those sites :1orglaugh

Bounce rate and average time on page are nearly the same, with or without the pop.

Chrome supposed to block all pops back then while it was version 64 already.All the sites which i know still working and doing pops. Not to mention bunch of other stuff which suppose to be "no more" but still working fine. :1orglaugh

I visited two mindgeek tubes (you**** and porn***) and they both had a popup appear.

Google don’t have guts to send them notifications what they send to us. They have pops and will keep their pops and google will give them top rating in serp. Discrimination

Yep that's right, which is why Google has gone to blocking all ads on sites that aren't compliant. Come February I think there's going to be a lot of webmasters crying because they didn't do what is needed.

They will get exactly the same notifications, but let's face it, PornHub don't need Google as much as smaller sites because of a massive referral network and brand awareness.

I removed all popunders from my site and all my other ads having "google ad compliance" turned ON on ExoClick and google STILL says my ads are misleading after another check. What a shitty corporation.

Did you update the code of new google compliance add in site? Dod you give few hours before submitting site for review? Contact exoclick and send them latest video send to u by google

I have compliance turned ON since month. Lately only turned off popunders. Ads code for compliance on/off is same. The change is only on exoclick ads serving server scripts. Yes, I must contact exoclick.

The review video will tell you what is wrong. Last time when we submit site for a review... it was decline bcz of popunder not related to ads from exo... google compliance ads was on. You need to check which type of exo ads you are using.... push notifications and normal banner and messenger ads are google complaince from exo.... any other ad are risky

Yeah i guess them spending 100k $ monthly on backlinks is just for fun and kicks.:1orglaugh

I didn't say they didn't need Google, I said they don't need them as much as most other sites. If they got temporarily de-indexed or pushed down in rankings because of a problem they would have no problem fixing the issues and recovering. Google has penalised big sites before.

A smaller site that is a main source of income for a webmaster wouldn't be able to survive a de-indexing or penalty as easily.

The same, here exoclick google compliance function is just a joke, across all their ad formats.
Ad zones and sites get flaged, no mather if you use that function, or not.

Support is totally helpless and asking me for hours of programming and changing codes, to implement new class and trigger functions, into my site.

If chrome blocks sitewide ads (including revshare links) in february, the use of ad companies will be a risk that is not longer worth go.

You cannot compare company with dozen of employees and solo webmasters.

Now you're just trolling.

All I am saying is that Mindgeek would be less affected by a Google penalty than your average webmaster.

So it's important for webmasters to fix their Google issues before you get penalised or have all ads blocked in Chrome.

Yes it is important to fix those issues by bypassing google checks :)

That’s why we small webmaster compare to Mindgeek crying and scared of doing changes because revenue will go down but keeping all fear one one side we have do the changes to get chrome compliant, simple is that....

We have to do nothing!
And if we started earlier, Google would not have the monopoly it has today.

Whats next no animations or color on ads?
Did they really believe i will spend 2 days, to ad my sites to their webmaster tools?

The Google boat i sinking and that can be compensated for years, only by their own exscessive ad abuse
and the exploitation, of their monopoly position.

To owner of WEBSITE

Thank you for submitting your site WEBSITE.com for review on Jan 2, 2019.

Your site’s experiences have been reviewed, and no abusive issues were found. If your site was previously in "Failing" status, your Chrome enforcement status may have changed


No popup
No in player ad
No Messenger
No Fake message
No Cloaking

Now how to earn money to pay server bill?

Do
Popup
In player ad
Messenger
Fake message
Cloaking
:1orglaugh

So there will be no in video adverts on youtube soon?

Finally submitted all sites for a review without any ads to avoid enforcement. Better ads mean to webmaster no earning 😔

didn't they give you a list of acceptable practices ???

A video preroll ad is not an in player ad. An in player ad is like the pop ups that will comes up during a video.

Bettersads.org

what are you worrying about google for? you have an affiliate network[sort out some xml feeds,fhg dumps all formats etc etc......., drop them and bing

eveknows.................

when the tubes are not accessible and the torrents are gone

WE THE AFFILIATES WILL STILL BE HERE

I

REALLY

LIKE

|
|
|

Are plugrush 'adblock safe' popunders still ok to use?

I see there are settings for:
Activate on clickable content
Activate on any click
Turn off popunder

I have them all set to Activate on clickable content.

refer to https://betterads.org

everything you need to know is there

I turn off ALL ads for review, get "safe" status, and turn almost all on again (besides popunders) - we will see how long it will last :)

yeah, from what I heard many people just turn off ads for review, once they get OK status, they put them back... they review sites only once and that's why those manual reviews are BS and won't work. ads on sites change CONSTANTLY, if they don't find any agressive ads while their review, it doesn't mean they won't be there tomorrow... or in an hour etc... it's just BS... they would need to review all sites CONSTANTLY, again and again... pure fucking BS... nothing will change.

I was doing that once deliberately just to see how that works.

Are you sure about that?


Their shareholders will like that waste of money.

not 100% sure but it looks like that.

I put one of my sites, to the wmt, some days ago to check the status of the site
and found 4 reviews since july or august 2018.

maybe depends on the site... they are probably targeting higher traffic sites... I don't think they will review millions of sites repeatedly.

From the other hand, it would be to easy - get pass one review and being safe forever... I'm afraid reviews will be reoccurring, but with different intervals for different sites. And after not pass the review, some time of penalty (for example 30 days).

The problem is I still don't know if vast pre-rolls are safe or not and I don't know how to interpret the fact that sticky ads can be max 30% of screen. If sticky is fixed to 300x250, the percentage will be vary for different screen resolutions. For example, I have still many mobile visitors with 480x360 resolution.

ppl have already said google only want sites running adwords

google does not allow adult searches in many countries and more to follow

After how many days you put the ads back on? How many days google took to review the site?

Their wmt panel says only two reviews per site.

Mine was nearly in realtime.
Straight after doing the changes and hiting the review button, ads where back on chrome.

contact me if u want me to help with ads. i know a few things :)

It mentions pop up adverts, not popunders.

Only in this thread people discuss google mentioning popunder, so how are we supposed to know what is and is not ok, if the reference site does not even mention popunders?

2 review per site for the first time in 30 days. If both both decline then tou got another review after 30 days

Its because when you submit site for a review, enforcement get paused and ads comes back. Did you get confirmation by email review successful?

:helpme :error