The Supreme Court just struck down Trump's asylum ban plea Merry Christmas! - GoFuckYourself.com

Bladewire · 12-21-2018, 02:45 PM

Another loss for Trump

"Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum ban for immigrants who illegally cross US-Mexico border."

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum ban for immigrants who illegally cross US-Mexico border

The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum.

In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy.

The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum.

In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy.

ADVERTISING

The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security jointly issued the rule in November and said it sought to tamp down what the Trump administration called "meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources."

Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar sided with the rule's opponents, temporarily blocking the order's provisions applying to immigrants suspected to have crossed the border illegally.

The decision was a narrow 5-4 ruling, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court's more liberal justices against the administration's request for a stay.

The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum.

In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy.

ADVERTISING

The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security jointly issued the rule in November and said it sought to tamp down what the Trump administration called "meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources."

Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar sided with the rule's opponents, temporarily blocking the order's provisions applying to immigrants suspected to have crossed the border illegally.

The decision was a narrow 5-4 ruling, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court's more liberal justices against the administration's request for a stay.

President Trump directed the move in November, part of a unilateral push by the administration to change decades-old rules governing asylum claims, which under a 1965 law stated that any migrant could claim asylum, regardless of their method of entry.

The Trump administration has argued that provisions in the same law allow the president to "suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens" if it is decided that their entry is "detrimental to the interests of the United States," the same reasoning the federal government previously used to defend Trump's travel ban.

Critics of the move saw it as unlawful and needlessly cruel to asylum applicants.

"Denying people the right to seek asylum is cruel, unjust, and also unlawful," Tom Jawetz, vice president of immigration policy at the liberal Center for American Progress, said last month.

jsmih · 12-21-2018, 08:14 PM

Given this is a pretty low value decision (about a temporary block), you gotta wonder if John Roberts was doing a little payback for all of Trump's judge bashing.

aimike · 12-22-2018, 04:38 AM

So you're happy when people come here illegally and then get to stay ?

This is a prime example of why Liberals are mentally ill.

They get happy when people break our countries laws. Self destructive fools.

brassmonkey · 12-22-2018, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aimike

So you're happy when people come here illegally and then get to stay ?

This is a prime example of why Liberals are mentally ill.

They get happy when people break our countries laws. Self destructive fools.

cali is a money pit

Bladewire · 12-22-2018, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsmih

Given this is a pretty low value decision (about a temporary block), you gotta wonder if John Roberts was doing a little payback for all of Trump's judge bashing.

Trump's stance is that he can stop anyone & everyone from entering the country if & when he so pleases. Trump will keep getting knocked down by the courts, as he has been multiple times the last two years, on the same topic, for the same reason

RedFred · 12-22-2018, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aimike

So you're happy when people come here illegally and then get to stay ?

This is a prime example of why Liberals are mentally ill.

They get happy when people break our countries laws. Self destructive fools.

Except the Supreme Court is predominately right wing, genius.

12-21-2018, 02:45 PM	#1
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	The Supreme Court just struck down Trump's asylum ban plea Merry Christmas! Another loss for Trump "Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum ban for immigrants who illegally cross US-Mexico border." Supreme Court rejects Trump plea to enforce asylum ban for immigrants who illegally cross US-Mexico border The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum. In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy. The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum. In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy. ADVERTISING The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security jointly issued the rule in November and said it sought to tamp down what the Trump administration called "meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources." Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar sided with the rule's opponents, temporarily blocking the order's provisions applying to immigrants suspected to have crossed the border illegally. The decision was a narrow 5-4 ruling, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court's more liberal justices against the administration's request for a stay. The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum. In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy. ADVERTISING The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security jointly issued the rule in November and said it sought to tamp down what the Trump administration called "meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources." Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar sided with the rule's opponents, temporarily blocking the order's provisions applying to immigrants suspected to have crossed the border illegally. The decision was a narrow 5-4 ruling, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court's more liberal justices against the administration's request for a stay. President Trump directed the move in November, part of a unilateral push by the administration to change decades-old rules governing asylum claims, which under a 1965 law stated that any migrant could claim asylum, regardless of their method of entry. The Trump administration has argued that provisions in the same law allow the president to "suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens" if it is decided that their entry is "detrimental to the interests of the United States," the same reasoning the federal government previously used to defend Trump's travel ban. Critics of the move saw it as unlawful and needlessly cruel to asylum applicants. "Denying people the right to seek asylum is cruel, unjust, and also unlawful," Tom Jawetz, vice president of immigration policy at the liberal Center for American Progress, said last month.

12-22-2018, 04:38 AM	#3
aimike Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2017 Posts: 558	So you're happy when people come here illegally and then get to stay ? This is a prime example of why Liberals are mentally ill. They get happy when people break our countries laws. Self destructive fools. __________________ Get Custom Adult Website Design

12-21-2018, 08:14 PM	#2
jsmih Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 334	Given this is a pretty low value decision (about a temporary block), you gotta wonder if John Roberts was doing a little payback for all of Trump's judge bashing.