Who watched the Donald's 12/18/2017 National Security Speech

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve Rupe
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2016
    • 3070

    #1

    Who watched the Donald's 12/18/2017 National Security Speech

    Any thoughts to offer on the new policies? If you are current or former military please identify yourself as same.
  • Bladewire
    StraightBro
    • Aug 2003
    • 56228

    #2
    He's a blustering idiot that will take us to war rather than be publicly humiliated.


    Skype: CallTomNow

    Comment

    • beerptrol
      Confirmed Asshole
      • Feb 2003
      • 12722

      #3
      a blubbering baboon flinging shit! . His actions and what he said in his speech don't match.
      “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
      -- Ulysses S. Grant

      Comment

      • directfiesta
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 30135

        #4
        Teleprompter kid .....
        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

        Comment

        • Rochard
          Jägermeister Test Pilot
          • Dec 2001
          • 75733

          #5
          I did not watch it. It's safe to assume he addressed the actions we are going to take to protect ourselves after the disaster of the last election, RIGHT?
          Herschel Savage
          Brooklyn, NY

          Comment

          • GAMEFINEST
            Make STACK$
            • Nov 2006
            • 14478

            #6
            Ill pass
            Compound interest.

            Comment

            • Bladewire
              StraightBro
              • Aug 2003
              • 56228

              #7
              "You know... Putin thanked me for helping stop a bombing in St. Petersburg last week we talk on the phone a lot and he respects me like an equal"


              Skype: CallTomNow

              Comment

              • TheDynasty
                See Signature
                • Apr 2016
                • 5882

                #8
                Try out WP-SCRIPT The Best Tube Script

                Comment

                • Busty2
                  Member since 1999
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 7202

                  #9
                  Pass, i was too busy watching paint dry. Way more fun!

                  Comment

                  • Steve Rupe
                    Confirmed User
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 3070

                    #10
                    I watched it and I personally liked the new policies presented in the speech if they are actually implemented and are followed thru.

                    Comment

                    • mineistaken
                      See signature :)
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 29656

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                      I watched it and I personally liked the new policies presented in the speech if they are actually implemented and are followed thru.
                      Your opinion is not popular with all/most of the crookedteers who posted above.
                      Remember - nothing must be good when Donald is involved.

                      Comment

                      • Steve Rupe
                        Confirmed User
                        • Nov 2016
                        • 3070

                        #12
                        Originally posted by mineistaken
                        Your opinion is not popular with all/most of the crookedteers who posted above.
                        Remember - nothing must be good when Donald is involved.
                        I couldn't care less.

                        Comment

                        • mineistaken
                          See signature :)
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 29656

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                          I couldn't care less.
                          Quality person
                          Most of the above mentioned - simply follow the MSM's narrative.

                          Comment

                          • Steve Rupe
                            Confirmed User
                            • Nov 2016
                            • 3070

                            #14
                            Originally posted by mineistaken
                            Quality person
                            Most of the above mentioned - simply follow the MSM's narrative.
                            I liked the proposals in this singular speech, but by no means do I like the Donald. He is not Presidential quality but is in fact a shady, conman, and the proof is in the hundreds of law suits against him over the years as well as the hundreds currently against him. Many, if not most, he has either settled with, or has lost in court.

                            Comment

                            • pimpmaster9000
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Dec 2011
                              • 26732

                              #15
                              Racket

                              Originally, and often still specifically, a racket was a criminal act in which the perpetrator or perpetrators offer a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a non-existent problem, or a service that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket did not exist. Conducting a racket is racketeering.[1] Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.




                              Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                              Comment

                              • Steve Rupe
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2016
                                • 3070

                                #16
                                Originally posted by crucifissio
                                Racket

                                Originally, and often still specifically, a racket was a criminal act in which the perpetrator or perpetrators offer a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a non-existent problem, or a service that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket did not exist. Conducting a racket is racketeering.[1] Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.




                                More nonsensical babble from this traumatized, brain damaged, ignorant, 3rd world person.

                                Comment

                                • pimpmaster9000
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Dec 2011
                                  • 26732

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                  More nonsensical babble from this traumatized, brain damaged, ignorant, 3rd world person.
                                  this part of the quote describes particularly well the US military industrial complex:

                                  The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.


                                  it really hits the nail on the head...700 billion$/year racket to protect the USA against imaginary enemies, IRL its used to racketeer american citizens and protect corporate interests abroad...when I say corporate interests I mean the 1% not the american people LOL

                                  enjoy the racket daquan
                                  Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                  Comment

                                  • Steve Rupe
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2016
                                    • 3070

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by crucifissio
                                    this part of the quote describes particularly well the US military industrial complex:

                                    The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.


                                    it really hits the nail on the head...700 billion$/year racket to protect the USA against imaginary enemies, IRL its used to racketeer american citizens and protect corporate interests abroad...when I say corporate interests I mean the 1% not the american people LOL

                                    enjoy the racket daquan
                                    I am very happy to not be a traumatized, brain damaged, ignorant, citizen of an unimportant 3rd world country like yourself.

                                    I very much enjoy being a citizen of the richest most influential, most powerful nation the world has ever known.

                                    Comment

                                    • pimpmaster9000
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Dec 2011
                                      • 26732

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                      I am very happy to not be a traumatized, brain damaged, ignorant, citizen of an unimportant 3rd world country like yourself.

                                      I very much enjoy being a citizen of the richest most influential, most powerful nation the world has ever known.
                                      daquan





                                      Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                      Comment

                                      • mineistaken
                                        See signature :)
                                        • Apr 2007
                                        • 29656

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                        I liked the proposals in this singular speech, but by no means do I like the Donald. He is not Presidential quality but is in fact a shady, conman, and the proof is in the hundreds of law suits against him over the years as well as the hundreds currently against him. Many, if not most, he has either settled with, or has lost in court.
                                        That was my point, you evaluated a proposal and you liked it.
                                        Most of gfy crookedteers would automatically claim it is bad just because of Donald.

                                        Comment

                                        • Steve Rupe
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Nov 2016
                                          • 3070

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by mineistaken
                                          That was my point, you evaluated a proposal and you liked it.
                                          Most of gfy crookedteers would automatically claim it is bad just because of Donald.
                                          My confidence level is high about the correctness of your second statement.

                                          Comment

                                          • OneHungLo
                                            So Fucking Banned
                                            • May 2001
                                            • 40906

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by crucifissio
                                            Racket

                                            Originally, and often still specifically, a racket was a criminal act in which the perpetrator or perpetrators offer a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a non-existent problem, or a service that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket did not exist. Conducting a racket is racketeering.[1] Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.




                                            Go write another 500 word essay and try to convince us why you're not a beta pussy

                                            Comment

                                            • pimpmaster9000
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Dec 2011
                                              • 26732

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                              Go write another 500 word essay and try to convince us why you're not a beta pussy
                                              Actually, you faggot, it was a copy paste LOL
                                              Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                              Comment

                                              • Grapesoda
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Jul 2003
                                                • 46238

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                                I watched it and I personally liked the new policies presented in the speech if they are actually implemented and are followed thru.
                                                yeah I've been hearing good stuff about the tax cut and the Israel thing

                                                Comment

                                                • Grapesoda
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                  • 46238

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                                  I liked the proposals in this singular speech, but by no means do I like the Donald. He is not Presidential quality but is in fact a shady, conman, and the proof is in the hundreds of law suits against him over the years as well as the hundreds currently against him. Many, if not most, he has either settled with, or has lost in court.
                                                  most if not all the presidents have been a bit shifty

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Grapesoda
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Jul 2003
                                                    • 46238

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by crucifissio
                                                    this part of the quote describes particularly well the US military industrial complex:

                                                    The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket". The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.


                                                    it really hits the nail on the head...700 billion$/year racket to protect the USA against imaginary enemies, IRL its used to racketeer american citizens and protect corporate interests abroad...when I say corporate interests I mean the 1% not the american people LOL

                                                    enjoy the racket daquan
                                                    dear misinformed: you have stated this post like it's something new only you have figured out... it's been this EXACT same way with us as people since the beginning... 25,000 years ago...what the fuck dude?? really you think they just figured this out 40 or 50 years ago? what a fucking dope


                                                    BTW ask Iraq and Afghanistan about imaginary enemies... fuck ask the damn mexicans

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Rochard
                                                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                                      • Dec 2001
                                                      • 75733

                                                      #27
                                                      Did he address the biggest threat to our nation? The Russians hacking our election?
                                                      Herschel Savage
                                                      Brooklyn, NY

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Grapesoda
                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                        • Jul 2003
                                                        • 46238

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by crucifissio
                                                        daquan



                                                        [/IMG]
                                                        another boob newbie mistake; the LIBERAL DEMOCRATS control the media... now, where is that push for war coming from again??? who is against the Russians and trying to start trouble in NK and with China? the "MEDIA" cash for clicks..you and a billion of your shit hole friends get killed...? so what more clicks

                                                        Comment

                                                        • pimpmaster9000
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Dec 2011
                                                          • 26732

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                                          dear misinformed: you have stated this post like it's something new only you have figured out... it's been this EXACT same way with us as people since the beginning... 25,000 years ago...what the fuck dude?? really you think they just figured this out 40 or 50 years ago? what a fucking dope


                                                          BTW ask Iraq and Afghanistan about imaginary enemies... fuck ask the damn mexicans
                                                          one day the weak will arm the fuck up...I am not talking about conventional weapons...I am talking about "OFF" switches to life on earth...now either there will be peace or there will be peace...war will not be an option in any case...

                                                          daquan will get really really angry at the thought of the weak arming up and being able to keep his gang away
                                                          Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Steve Rupe
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Nov 2016
                                                            • 3070

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by crucifissio
                                                            one day the weak will arm the fuck up...I am not talking about conventional weapons...I am talking about "OFF" switches to life on earth...now either there will be peace or there will be peace...war will not be an option in any case...

                                                            daquan will get really really angry at the thought of the weak arming up and being able to keep his gang away
                                                            Even if this were to ever happen I have the pleasure of knowing it will not be in your lifetime.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • pimpmaster9000
                                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                              • Dec 2011
                                                              • 26732

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                                              Even if this were to ever happen I have the pleasure of knowing it will not be in your lifetime.
                                                              daquan, the ONLY reason N.korea has nukes is the USA...to keep your racketeers away...

                                                              now it just takes one country in the ME to nuke up...iran is a good example...once iran nukes up the domino effect may well get others nuking up...fat boy kim will sell one day...pooty or china may sell just to fuck the USA for lolz...aint shit you can do about it...

                                                              just keep pushing

                                                              merry xmass daquan!
                                                              Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Steve Rupe
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Nov 2016
                                                                • 3070

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by crucifissio
                                                                daquan, the ONLY reason N.korea has nukes is the USA...to keep your racketeers away...

                                                                now it just takes one country in the ME to nuke up...iran is a good example...once iran nukes up the domino effect may well get others nuking up...fat boy kim will sell one day...pooty or china may sell just to fuck the USA for lolz...aint shit you can do about it...

                                                                just keep pushing

                                                                merry xmass daquan!
                                                                You are delusional and will never see your delusional dreams come to fruition in your life time. You will go to your grave suffering with the same delusions that you have now.

                                                                Comment

                                                                Working...