I know in the end game it will cost high volume site owners and they will have to increase their subscription costs -- so the consumer will pay in the end.
Conversely, consumers may pay more for from their ISP for better access to high bandwidth websites.
Or, a combination of both. You can be sure it will cost more somehow ...
ISPs will be able to block all websites and provide you the most popular sites in packages, much like TV channels. Sites they pick, not you. If you want a higher more diverse set of web sites, it'll be a higher costing package. So on and so fourth. If you want unblocked, unthrottled, full access to the internet (unchanged from the internet you're now familiar with), expect it to be an ultra-premium package for the low low price of $500 per month.
You know you'll pay it. They know you'll pay it. They may even make it $1000 per month.
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
Obviously the cable company/ISPs see this as a huge (yuge?) opportunity to recoup losses from people dumping their cable services in favor of streaming, but I think the real winners will be the VPN providers.
The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature. Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs.
Napster? who made that chart as a giant meme?
I guess I am wrong Napster is still in business as a streaming service.
1/2 the web may move to tor and the onion if they will really discriminate by FQDN
Napster? who made that chart as a giant meme?
I guess I am wrong Napster is still in business as a streaming service.
1/2 the web may move to tor and the onion if they will really discriminate by FQDN
Comment