You are 100% right and that's one of the reason we are claiming that it shouldn't be the only stream and that you should keep the traditional stream in parallel. We are, in that way, preparing coaching guidance for future VR performers. They should advice the user when to take the VR glasses and when it is better to remove. When action start or stop. But at the end, users will do what ever they want for sure!
True... Difficult to be pioneers and I think we should say "chapeau" to them as at lest they tried and tried hard. And they are not all dead...
A real key to launch a new wave is to reach rapidly the tipping point that most of the time depend on the choice of the influencers and the critical mass. Having a show time to time can't build the clientele, as well as having almost no choice (a few cameras only and most of the time not necessarily the kind of models you like) can't deliver the message that it has to be tested...
I don't know if we will make the difference, we will see. At least we are trying to work on the 2 last points: 24/7 of many 3D-VR cameras on several sites...
If it doen't work, then will be another one who will make it as like you said:
Please support us, we are trying hard ;)
True... Difficult to be pioneers and I think we should say "chapeau" to them as at lest they tried and tried hard. And they are not all dead...
A real key to launch a new wave is to reach rapidly the tipping point that most of the time depend on the choice of the influencers and the critical mass. Having a show time to time can't build the clientele, as well as having almost no choice (a few cameras only and most of the time not necessarily the kind of models you like) can't deliver the message that it has to be tested...
I don't know if we will make the difference, we will see. At least we are trying to work on the 2 last points: 24/7 of many 3D-VR cameras on several sites...
If it doen't work, then will be another one who will make it as like you said:
Please support us, we are trying hard ;)
Comment