At last proof that the CIA planned 9/11
Collapse
X
-
-
Turnips like WHP talk as if their delerium is backed up by facts. They wll tell you that it is proved beyond doubt that the towers were packed to the rafters with sophisticated explosives. They blither about the hoards of experts blah blah blah.
This is all bullshit."Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.comComment
-
Comment
-
Says someone who hasn't even spent more than 3 minutes looking into the topic
Comment
-
This subject was determined to be settled a long time ago...
And if it were not for the fuel that burned after the strike, it would not have collapsed.
For it caused the metal supporting structure (frame) to bend and break. The shock of that heavy impact to the floors below was to much and they fell one after the other from the weight striking it in a way that it was not designed to handle like dominos.
And yes it does look like the same method one would use to demo a building of this size.
Because that was the intent of those folks who sent the planes in where they did with as much fuel as possible at the time of impact. It was not by chance but design.
They intended to do just what happened or they would have crashed them at a lower level. It was known after the attempted bombs in the foundation in the 90's that they had the design blueprints of the building and there was a pretty big scandal about that back then. They were well advised by a engineer.Comment
-
Comment
-
You are correct. I watched the video/videos, there are multiple videos out there, and it is apparent from watching the videos there is zero proof of a controlled demolition.
None the less watching a video is not an "examination" so no there has not been an examination by "thousands of engineers and architects".Comment
-
ok than is only ONE final question open. WHY is it call conspiracy theory when all those 1000nds would exist?
i think it is the same as with your thousands of climate change deniers - when it comes to the base you will find out that they are just a few with no skills or on the payroll of the oil and coal industry.
but you know what is the real tragedy on that?
it is that a few idiots who believe that they are jesus christ and santa in one person wants us to infect with that idiot virus.
feel free to stay a zombie but you should give it up to believe that the bite is contagious.
that part of what the small man in your ear told you is a fairy tale !Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.comComment
-
there are even MUCH more videos out there what can explain this brain bonsais the logic behind physical rules - but the problem is that they will not even watch it because they love to believe they are the robin hoods of the matrix.You are correct. I watched the video/videos, there are multiple videos out there, and it is apparent from watching the videos there is zero proof of a controlled demolition.
None the less watching a video is not an "examination" so no there has not been an examination by "thousands of engineers and architects".Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.comComment
-
But it was hit by an object/objects many times larger than a plane, the trade center buildings, and it caused so much damage to the building that it caused the building to fall after a period of time. It is also apparent from all of the videos that the building did not fall straight down as is claimed by the nut cases of which you are one.
The fire fighters inside the building told their superiors that the building was going to fall and after a discussion between several of them as well as with the owner of the building the order was given to "pull" them from the building and sure enough the building fell.Comment
-
If some bricks hit a steel building, it wouldn't fall perfectly into it's all footprint within seconds, if it would then controlled demolitions wouldn't be required anymore, people would just throw a few bricks at a building to take it down.But it was hit by an object/objects many times larger than a plane, the trade center buildings, and it caused so much damage to the building that it caused the building to fall after a period of time. It is also apparent from all of the videos that the building did not fall straight down as is claimed by the nut cases of which you are one.
The fire fighters inside the building told their superiors that the building was going to fall and after a discussion between several of them as well as with the owner of the building the order was given to "pull" them from the building and sure enough the building fell.
The fire fighters had been given information that the building would be pulled, even Larry Silverstein himself admitted that building was pulled down in an interview.Comment
-
The conspiracy theory is about the muslims with boxcutters hijacking planes and flying them into buildings
The people who control the oil industry also control the climate change agenda, it is their new control system
Not sure how that relates to 9/11 and I've never met those people you discuss, I prefer to stay on topics where I have empirical evidence at my finger tips. Perhaps you can start a new thread about the folks at your local bar and their belief system.Comment
-
The fire fighters inside the buildings are the ones that told their Superiors that they thought the building may collapse. Their Superiors discussed the matter and included in the discussion was the owner of the building and he said to "pull it" referring to pull the firemen out as he later explained when you nut cases claimed "pull it" was a term only used in demolitions, which in an of itself is ridiculous.If some bricks hit a steel building, it wouldn't fall perfectly into it's all footprint within seconds, if it would then controlled demolitions wouldn't be require, people who just throw a few bricks at a building to take it down.
The fire fighters had been given information that the building would be pulled, even Larry Silverstein himself admitted that building was pulled down in an interview.
You are a nutcase, ignorant of fact and this is the end of the conversation.Comment
-
You are a very trusting fellow indeed, the difference with me is that my critical thinking skills far outweigh my blind trust. What you have have wrote is not fact, but narrative, a narrative created as a cover story. If we are interested in what the fireman were saying on the day, they were talking about lots of explosions in all three buildings, explosions are required as part of a controlled demolition.The fire fighters inside the buildings are the ones that told their Superiors that they thought the building may collapse. Their Superiors discussed the matter and included in the discussion was the owner of the building and he said to "pull it" referring to pull the firemen out as he later explained when you nut cases claimed "pull it" was a term only used in demolitions, which in an of itself is ridiculous.
You are nutcase, ignorant of fact and this is the end of the conversation.Comment

BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year
Comment