At last proof that the CIA planned 9/11

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve Rupe
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2016
    • 3070

    #46
    Originally posted by wehateporn
    The thousands of architects and engineers who have examined the collapse of WTC7 will tell you it was a controlled demolition, whereas the thousands who haven't examined it yet will mostly believe that only two towers collapsed on September 11th 2001
    Thousands have not examined the collapse of the buildings. Watching a video is not an examination.

    Comment

    • NewNick
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2009
      • 7229

      #47
      Originally posted by Steve Rupe
      Thousands have not examined the collapse of the buildings. Watching a video is not an examination.
      Turnips like WHP talk as if their delerium is backed up by facts. They wll tell you that it is proved beyond doubt that the towers were packed to the rafters with sophisticated explosives. They blither about the hoards of experts blah blah blah.

      This is all bullshit.
      "Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
      “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
      “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com

      Comment

      • wehateporn
        Promoting Debate on GFY
        • Apr 2007
        • 27176

        #48
        Originally posted by Steve Rupe
        Thousands have not examined the collapse of the buildings. Watching a video is not an examination.
        For something as obvious as whether it's a controlled demo or not, one only needs to watch the video

        Comment

        • wehateporn
          Promoting Debate on GFY
          • Apr 2007
          • 27176

          #49
          Originally posted by NewNick
          Turnips like WHP talk as if their delerium is backed up by facts. They wll tell you that it is proved beyond doubt that the towers were packed to the rafters with sophisticated explosives. They blither about the hoards of experts blah blah blah.

          This is all bullshit.
          Says someone who hasn't even spent more than 3 minutes looking into the topic

          Comment

          • VRPdommy
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2014
            • 13000

            #50
            This subject was determined to be settled a long time ago...
            And if it were not for the fuel that burned after the strike, it would not have collapsed.

            For it caused the metal supporting structure (frame) to bend and break. The shock of that heavy impact to the floors below was to much and they fell one after the other from the weight striking it in a way that it was not designed to handle like dominos.

            And yes it does look like the same method one would use to demo a building of this size.

            Because that was the intent of those folks who sent the planes in where they did with as much fuel as possible at the time of impact. It was not by chance but design.

            They intended to do just what happened or they would have crashed them at a lower level. It was known after the attempted bombs in the foundation in the 90's that they had the design blueprints of the building and there was a pretty big scandal about that back then. They were well advised by a engineer.

            Comment

            • seeandsee
              Check SIG!
              • Mar 2006
              • 50945

              #51
              building 7 fall down from fire? lolllllllllllllllllllllll
              BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

              Contact here

              Comment

              • wehateporn
                Promoting Debate on GFY
                • Apr 2007
                • 27176

                #52
                Originally posted by VRPdommy
                This subject was determined to be settled a long time ago...
                And if it were not for the fuel that burned after the strike, it would not have collapsed.
                A quick heads up, WTC7 was not hit by a plane

                Comment

                • Steve Rupe
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2016
                  • 3070

                  #53
                  Originally posted by wehateporn
                  For something as obvious as whether it's a controlled demo or not, one only needs to watch the video
                  You are correct. I watched the video/videos, there are multiple videos out there, and it is apparent from watching the videos there is zero proof of a controlled demolition.

                  None the less watching a video is not an "examination" so no there has not been an examination by "thousands of engineers and architects".

                  Comment

                  • thommy
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 5469

                    #54
                    Originally posted by wehateporn
                    The thousands of architects and engineers who have examined the collapse of WTC7 will tell you it was a controlled demolition, whereas the thousands who haven't examined it yet will mostly believe that only two towers collapsed on September 11th 2001
                    ok than is only ONE final question open. WHY is it call conspiracy theory when all those 1000nds would exist?

                    i think it is the same as with your thousands of climate change deniers - when it comes to the base you will find out that they are just a few with no skills or on the payroll of the oil and coal industry.

                    but you know what is the real tragedy on that?

                    it is that a few idiots who believe that they are jesus christ and santa in one person wants us to infect with that idiot virus.

                    feel free to stay a zombie but you should give it up to believe that the bite is contagious.
                    that part of what the small man in your ear told you is a fairy tale !
                    Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                    www.trafficfabrik.com

                    Comment

                    • thommy
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 5469

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                      You are correct. I watched the video/videos, there are multiple videos out there, and it is apparent from watching the videos there is zero proof of a controlled demolition.

                      None the less watching a video is not an "examination" so no there has not been an examination by "thousands of engineers and architects".
                      there are even MUCH more videos out there what can explain this brain bonsais the logic behind physical rules - but the problem is that they will not even watch it because they love to believe they are the robin hoods of the matrix.
                      Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
                      www.trafficfabrik.com

                      Comment

                      • Steve Rupe
                        Confirmed User
                        • Nov 2016
                        • 3070

                        #56
                        Originally posted by wehateporn
                        A quick heads up, WTC7 was not hit by a plane
                        But it was hit by an object/objects many times larger than a plane, the trade center buildings, and it caused so much damage to the building that it caused the building to fall after a period of time. It is also apparent from all of the videos that the building did not fall straight down as is claimed by the nut cases of which you are one.

                        The fire fighters inside the building told their superiors that the building was going to fall and after a discussion between several of them as well as with the owner of the building the order was given to "pull" them from the building and sure enough the building fell.

                        Comment

                        • wehateporn
                          Promoting Debate on GFY
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 27176

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                          But it was hit by an object/objects many times larger than a plane, the trade center buildings, and it caused so much damage to the building that it caused the building to fall after a period of time. It is also apparent from all of the videos that the building did not fall straight down as is claimed by the nut cases of which you are one.

                          The fire fighters inside the building told their superiors that the building was going to fall and after a discussion between several of them as well as with the owner of the building the order was given to "pull" them from the building and sure enough the building fell.
                          If some bricks hit a steel building, it wouldn't fall perfectly into it's all footprint within seconds, if it would then controlled demolitions wouldn't be required anymore, people would just throw a few bricks at a building to take it down.

                          The fire fighters had been given information that the building would be pulled, even Larry Silverstein himself admitted that building was pulled down in an interview.

                          Comment

                          • wehateporn
                            Promoting Debate on GFY
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 27176

                            #58
                            Originally posted by thommy
                            ok than is only ONE final question open. WHY is it call conspiracy theory when all those 1000nds would exist?
                            The conspiracy theory is about the muslims with boxcutters hijacking planes and flying them into buildings

                            Originally posted by thommy
                            i think it is the same as with your thousands of climate change deniers - when it comes to the base you will find out that they are just a few with no skills or on the payroll of the oil and coal industry.
                            The people who control the oil industry also control the climate change agenda, it is their new control system

                            Originally posted by thommy
                            it is that a few idiots who believe that they are jesus christ and santa in one person wants us to infect with that idiot virus.
                            Not sure how that relates to 9/11 and I've never met those people you discuss, I prefer to stay on topics where I have empirical evidence at my finger tips. Perhaps you can start a new thread about the folks at your local bar and their belief system.

                            Comment

                            • Steve Rupe
                              Confirmed User
                              • Nov 2016
                              • 3070

                              #59
                              Originally posted by wehateporn
                              If some bricks hit a steel building, it wouldn't fall perfectly into it's all footprint within seconds, if it would then controlled demolitions wouldn't be require, people who just throw a few bricks at a building to take it down.

                              The fire fighters had been given information that the building would be pulled, even Larry Silverstein himself admitted that building was pulled down in an interview.
                              The fire fighters inside the buildings are the ones that told their Superiors that they thought the building may collapse. Their Superiors discussed the matter and included in the discussion was the owner of the building and he said to "pull it" referring to pull the firemen out as he later explained when you nut cases claimed "pull it" was a term only used in demolitions, which in an of itself is ridiculous.

                              You are a nutcase, ignorant of fact and this is the end of the conversation.

                              Comment

                              • wehateporn
                                Promoting Debate on GFY
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 27176

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                The fire fighters inside the buildings are the ones that told their Superiors that they thought the building may collapse. Their Superiors discussed the matter and included in the discussion was the owner of the building and he said to "pull it" referring to pull the firemen out as he later explained when you nut cases claimed "pull it" was a term only used in demolitions, which in an of itself is ridiculous.

                                You are nutcase, ignorant of fact and this is the end of the conversation.
                                You are a very trusting fellow indeed, the difference with me is that my critical thinking skills far outweigh my blind trust. What you have have wrote is not fact, but narrative, a narrative created as a cover story. If we are interested in what the fireman were saying on the day, they were talking about lots of explosions in all three buildings, explosions are required as part of a controlled demolition.

                                Comment

                                Working...