Solving the Mystery of Building 7

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176
    #1

    Solving the Mystery of Building 7

    Tags: None
    • TheSquealer
      Mayor of Thneedville
      • Oct 2004
      • 26172
      #2
      Of course by "mystery", you mean "the insane rantings of paranoid conspiracy lunatics".

      Thankfully you found a washed up, almost dead actor to explain it all to us.
      .
      Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

      Rochard

        Comment

        • Rochard
          Jägermeister Test Pilot
          • Dec 2001
          • 75733
          #3
          I lasted three minutes and.... Oh hell no.

          This video talks about "common office fires" as if there was no real cause for the collapse. It was more like the building was hit by burning debris from the crash itself, caught fire, and then the fires continued all day. Then we have both towers falling - there is seismic damage, more debris hitting the building. All of this combined caused some of the girders to give way leading to progressive collapse.

          Here is what really happened:
          https://www.nist.gov/pba/questions-a...-investigation
          Herschel Savage
          Brooklyn, NY

            Comment

            • Steve Rupe
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2016
              • 3070
              #4
              Originally posted by Rochard
              I lasted three minutes and.... Oh hell no.

              This video talks about "common office fires" as if there was no real cause for the collapse. It was more like the building was hit by burning debris from the crash itself, caught fire, and then the fires continued all day. Then we have both towers falling - there is seismic damage, more debris hitting the building. All of this combined caused some of the girders to give way leading to progressive collapse.

              Here is what really happened:
              https://www.nist.gov/pba/questions-a...-investigation
              One side of building had a hugh gouge in it and this is the primary reason it collapsed. The fireman discussed what appeared to be its imminent collapse because of the gash and that is why it was decided to withdraw them. There is only mystery among people that are ignorant.

                Comment

                • wehateporn
                  Promoting Debate on GFY
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 27176
                  #5
                  Originally posted by TheSquealer
                  Of course by "mystery", you mean "the insane rantings of paranoid conspiracy lunatics".

                  Thankfully you found a washed up, almost dead actor to explain it all to us.
                  I am surprised to see you're not onto this one yet

                    Comment

                    • wehateporn
                      Promoting Debate on GFY
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 27176
                      #6
                      Originally posted by Rochard
                      I lasted three minutes and.... Oh hell no.

                      This video talks about "common office fires" as if there was no real cause for the collapse. It was more like the building was hit by burning debris from the crash itself, caught fire, and then the fires continued all day. Then we have both towers falling - there is seismic damage, more debris hitting the building. All of this combined caused some of the girders to give way leading to progressive collapse.

                      Here is what really happened:
                      https://www.nist.gov/pba/questions-a...-investigation
                      It wouldn't collapse in perfect controlled demolition style, this is the problem that architects have, unless the controlled demos are officially admitted, the thousands of architects and engineers will continue to speak out

                        Comment

                        • CaptainHowdy
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 94726
                          #7

                            Comment

                            • Acepimp
                              All Facts Matter
                              • Jan 2012
                              • 20309
                              #8
                              OF COURSE it was a controlled demolition. It's all been admitted. The building's owner even said it in an interview they decided to pull it down.

                              People actually believe it was an office fire that caused the building to drop in 7 seconds?

                              SKIP TO 2:08 in the above video- watch several guys say the building is about to blow.

                              HERE'S THE DEAL- You can't wire a large building in a couple hours. It would take weeks. So it was planned. The owner also admitted that they came up with the NEW DESIGN for wtc7 in April 2000.

                              Just look it up
                              Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

                              Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

                              Chat with live Streamate Camgirls

                                Comment

                                • Steve Rupe
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Nov 2016
                                  • 3070
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by Acepimp
                                  OF COURSE it was a controlled demolition. It's all been admitted. The building's owner even said it in an interview they decided to pull it down.

                                  People actually believe it was an office fire that caused the building to drop in 7 seconds?

                                  SKIP TO 2:08 in the above video- watch several guys say the building is about to blow.

                                  HERE'S THE DEAL- You can't wire a large building in a couple hours. It would take weeks. So it was planned. The owner also admitted that they came up with the NEW DESIGN for wtc7 in April 2000.

                                  Just look it up
                                  Total nonsense.

                                    Comment

                                    • Acepimp
                                      All Facts Matter
                                      • Jan 2012
                                      • 20309
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                      Total nonsense.
                                      Are you serious right now???

                                      Ok, please explain the guys in the video warning people that the building was about to blow up.

                                      Also, A fire on one side of the building has NEVER brought down a large building, but even if it could, it would cause it to topple over to one side. Please explain how it went straight down in 7 seconds. It's simple physics, yet you believe whatever the official story is?? total nonsense
                                      Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

                                      Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

                                      Chat with live Streamate Camgirls

                                        Comment

                                        • Rochard
                                          Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                          • Dec 2001
                                          • 75733
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by wehateporn
                                          It wouldn't collapse in perfect controlled demolition style, this is the problem that architects have, unless the controlled demos are officially admitted, the thousands of architects and engineers will continue to speak out
                                          Yes, it would collapse like this.

                                          When they do professional demo on a building they put explosives at the weak points so the structure fails. In this case - and in most cases when this happens - the weak points gave way, causing the rest to collapse.
                                          Herschel Savage
                                          Brooklyn, NY

                                            Comment

                                            • Steve Rupe
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Nov 2016
                                              • 3070
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by Acepimp
                                              Are you serious right now???

                                              Ok, please explain the guys in the video warning people that the building was about to blow up.

                                              Also, A fire on one side of the building has NEVER brought down a large building, but even if it could, it would cause it to topple over to one side. Please explain how it went straight down in 7 seconds. It's simple physics, yet you believe whatever the official story is?? total nonsense
                                              The large gash in its side is primarily what brought the building down and this was all brought out with video of the gash and the conversations of the fireman being ordered to evacuate the building and why they were being ordered to evacuate. This was made public not long after the events at the time. I will in no way rehash what has been public knowledge for years. It is nonsensical to do so, but your probably can find someone to play the game with you.

                                                Comment

                                                • Acepimp
                                                  All Facts Matter
                                                  • Jan 2012
                                                  • 20309
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                                  The large gash in its side is primarily what brought the building down and this was all brought out with video of the gash and the conversations of the fireman being ordered to evacuate the building and why they were being ordered to evacuate. This was made public not long after the events at the time. I will in no way rehash what has been public knowledge for years. It is nonsensical to do so, but your probably can find someone to play the game with you.

                                                  So the video of the owner saying they decided to pull it down- that didn't happen?

                                                  And the thousands of engineers, architects, and physicists who know it was a demolition- you know more than they do?

                                                  You're saying that for the first time ever in the history of the universe, some damage to a large building and a fire inside caused to collapse in 7 seconds, straight down??

                                                  Sorry bud, you're mistaken.
                                                  Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

                                                  Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

                                                  Chat with live Streamate Camgirls

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Steve Rupe
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Nov 2016
                                                      • 3070
                                                      #14
                                                      Originally posted by Acepimp

                                                      So the video of the owner saying they decided to pull it down- that didn't happen?

                                                      And the thousands of engineers, architects, and physicists who know it was a demolition- you know more than they do?

                                                      You're saying that for the first time ever in the history of the universe, some damage to a large building and a fire inside caused to collapse in 7 seconds, straight down??

                                                      Sorry bud, you're mistaken.
                                                      This will be my last comment to you because it is clear to me that you either are just a troll or another nutcase. The owner of the building has explained what he meant when he said to "pull it". I will now, not put you on ignore, but will ignore any further comments that you have to make about the events of 911. I am completely schooled on the events of 9/11 and will not rehash the events with you or any other person on this board or on this earth. There is nothing new for me to learn about that day.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Acepimp
                                                          All Facts Matter
                                                          • Jan 2012
                                                          • 20309
                                                          #15
                                                          Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                                                          This will be my last comment to you because it is clear to me that you either are just a troll or another nutcase. The owner of the building has explained what he meant when he said to "pull it". I will now, not put you on ignore, but will ignore any further comments that you have to make about the events of 911. I am completely schooled on the events of 9/11 and will not rehash the events with you or any other person on this board or on this earth. There is nothing new for me to learn about that day.
                                                          Hey Buddy- Buildings don't fall straight down unless all the key structural points are severed at the same time.

                                                          Your theory is not possible. Get some facts.
                                                          Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

                                                          Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

                                                          Chat with live Streamate Camgirls

                                                            Comment

                                                            Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
                                                            Working...