You also told us the moon landings were faked... Hummmm lets see making the wrong guess on a political election or proclaiming every major govt in the world is in on a giant hoax including our allies & foes as well as countless thousands of people who were involved..
Lets see believing in a massive conspiracy bigger than anything that has ever happened before and now adding a massive 9/11 conspiracy on top of it or guessing the wrong political candidate. Yea it's "almost" the same..
Fucking conspiracy nuts does reality not even enter your brain? Leave your fucking basement for fucks sake... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
If you believe they went to the moon in the 1960s with Thunderbirds strings and some grannies making their spacesuits, yet top tech country Japan can't go till 2030, then there's no point in trying to influence you on what you believe happened on 9/11
wehateporn
07-01-2017 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smack dat
(Post 21864571)
Conclusion
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total
collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate
times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which
attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade
a growing number of architects, engineers, and
scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly
to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed
by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications,
it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be
the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation
by responsible authorities. n
Physic professors are right nut job these days
wehateporn
07-01-2017 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe
(Post 21864607)
What is said on that image has been debunked but I am pretty sure that you know that and do not care.
Are you another paid govenment shill like Crockett?
thommy
07-01-2017 06:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21864619)
Physic professors are right nut job these days
why donīt you go and do the job ?
are you afraid to end up in the funny farm?
wehateporn
07-01-2017 06:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
(Post 21864580)
In Iran just this year a high rise building collapsed because of fire..
Oh look yet another Trump supporter who is also a conspiracy nutter.. Oh my I was right again..
Conclusion: you're a fucking moron...
Different type of collapse, building wasn't steel. Are you deliberately trying to mislead people or just new to this topic?
wehateporn
07-01-2017 06:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
(Post 21864628)
why donīt you go and do the job ?
are you afraid to end up in the funny farm?
I could have gone on to be a Maths professor myself, but it looked rather boring
crockett
07-01-2017 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21864631)
Different type of collapse, building wasn't steel. Are you deliberately trying to mislead people or just new to this topic?
Are you deliberately trying to be this dumb?
Acepimp
07-01-2017 09:14 AM
Hey GFY, This is not political. It's about physics.
There was a loud boom, then top of the building / the penthouse imploded first, then the building collapsed in a perfect freefall. Classic example of a controlled demolition. This is simple 9th grade physics, but I guess some people just aren't too bright. :1orglaugh
:pimp
Rochard
07-01-2017 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
(Post 21864031)
You fucking conspiracy fools are absolute retards. You guys all use the same pictures of the "front" of building 7 to claim it suffered no damage because it's "looks" ok..
The truth is the other WTC 1 building fell directly behind it. The entire back side of WTC7 was damaged severely by the falling debris from WTC 1 and fires had been raging inside the building for over 7 hours but due to the chaos and lose of life from the other two buildings collapses, fire fighters could not attempt to fight it..
The building failed because the heat damaged the steal structure to the point it finally gave in..
This explains what happened to WTC 7 so simply even a conspiracy retard can understand.
This is pictures of the back side of WTC 7 and the damage it took.. The pic is from your own conspiracy nut job site...
1. WTC 1 showered WTC 7 with debris, igniting fires and destroying the sprinkler system.
2. Long-duration fires undermined the steelwork supporting the eastern portion of the 10th floor, causing it to collapse.
3. The eastern portion of 10th floor fell onto a fire-weakened ninth floor, causing its eastern section to collapse.
4. A downward cascade of floor collapses ensued.
5. As the collapse progressed, interior columns buckled.
6. Floor framing supported by the buckling columns fell, causing failure to propagate to the top of the building, which manifested itself in the collapse of the east penthouse.
7. Falling debris impacted beams at the edges of the intact portion of the structure, causing failure to progress across the building.
8. You fucking conspiracy retards are morons.
This is what most people don't get. They look at the video and they see what looks like a perfectly normal building falling for no reason. They fail to understand the amount of damage the building took.
If this was a demo job that was set off intentionally.... Wouldn't they have done it at the same exact time as one of the towers?
thommy
07-01-2017 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acepimp
(Post 21864904)
Hey GFY, This is not political. It's about physics.
There was a loud boom, then top of the building / the penthouse imploded first, then the building collapsed in a perfect freefall. Classic example of a controlled demolition. This is simple 9th grade physics, but I guess some people just aren't too bright. :1orglaugh
:pimp
it just proves us that you are the same morons in physics as you are in politics.
if someone does not understand one thing it is called "not talented" if someone does not understand nothing it is broadly called STUPID.
so if you (asspimp and ihatemyself) have any talent - please let us know. we still have hope.
Rochard
07-01-2017 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by huey
(Post 21864556)
https://youtu.be/0l1rERWldoM
Now that's an office fire building still standing.
And this is proof of what? That an office building can have have a fire and still stand? Well, of course. But sometimes they fall.
Not all fires are the same. Not all buildings are same. And this wasn't just a fire. Someone else posted a picture of all of the damage the building had from the falling of the two towers.
wehateporn
07-01-2017 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
(Post 21864994)
If this was a demo job that was set off intentionally.... Wouldn't they have done it at the same exact time as one of the towers?
They were meant to, but the plane headed for WTC7 got delayed and shot down, this caused confusion as to whether to demo it or not, they wouldn't destroy it unless they knew they would receive an insurance payout
thommy
07-01-2017 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21864634)
I could have gone on to be a Maths professor myself, but it looked rather boring
i have bad news for you. if you can count 1+2 = 3 with the help of a calculator it is barely not enough to be a maths professor.
as you should know it is not even enough to be a successful porn webmaster.
wehateporn
07-01-2017 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
(Post 21865021)
i have bad news for you. if you can count 1+2 = 3 with the help of a calculator it is barely not enough to be a maths professor.
as you should know it is not even enough to be a successful porn webmaster.
You are talking about someone you don't know, the same as you talk about 9/11 without doing research to back it up, you are letting Switzerland down
Steve Rupe
07-01-2017 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21865114)
You are talking about someone you don't know, the same as you talk about 9/11 without doing research to back it up, you are letting Switzerland down
LOL, research? Watching youtube videos put together by ignorant nut cases like you are does not qualify as research even though you apparently think that it does.
wehateporn
07-01-2017 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe
(Post 21865174)
LOL, research? Watching youtube videos put together by ignorant nut cases like you are does not qualify as research even though you apparently think that it does.
I'd listen to the YouTube researcher over the Snopes/CNN researcher any day of the week :2 cents:
crockett
07-01-2017 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21865180)
I'd listen to the YouTube researcher over the Snopes/CNN researcher any day of the week :2 cents:
Yeah, we can obviously see that...
thommy
07-01-2017 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
(Post 21865114)
You are talking about someone you don't know, the same as you talk about 9/11 without doing research to back it up, you are letting Switzerland down
1. i do not have to know you - you showed all what is necessary to know who you are and what you are.
2. I do my researches but i do a broad research and I do not research in shitty conspiracy sources. you should do a research in all those million other sources what can explain you why you are wrong.
you are losing your lifetime in hunting a dear what does not exist.
I know some guys making good money with that shit because they know that idiots like you believe in it.
they are very glad that people like you are existing - but they would not believe the bullshit they are publishing.
