Google hit with record EU fine over Shopping service

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    Google hit with record EU fine over Shopping service


    Google has been fined 2.42bn euros ($2.7bn; £2.1bn) by the European Commission after it ruled the company had abused its power by promoting its own shopping comparison service at the top of search results.

    The amount is the regulator's largest penalty to date against a company accused of distorting the market.

    The ruling also orders Google to end its anti-competitive practices within 90 days or face a further penalty.

    The US firm said it may appeal.

    However, if it fails to change the way it operates the Shopping service within the three-month deadline, it could be forced to make payments of 5% of its parent company Alphabet's average daily worldwide earnings.

    Based on the company's most recent financial report, that amounts to about $14m a day.

    "What Google has done is illegal under EU antitrust rules," declared Margrethe Vestager, the European Union's Competition Commissioner.

    Continued Google hit with record EU fine over Shopping service - BBC News
  • Barry-xlovecam
    It's 42
    • Jun 2010
    • 18083

    #2
    Google AdWords just got more expensive in the EU ...

    Comment

    • freecartoonporn
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2012
      • 7683

      #3
      ill read it later.,
      but what did google actually do ?
      SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting | DigitalOcean

      Comment

      • AndyA
        So Fucking Banned
        • Apr 2001
        • 1670

        #4
        Google gave themselves undue advantage in the shopping searches.. I mean DUH if you use Google to search for shit their shit that they have deals with are coming up first

        Comment

        • Paul Markham
          Too old to care
          • Jun 2001
          • 52942

          #5
          It's Googles site, are the EU now telling Google what they can or can not put on their site?



          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

          Comment

          • LeMeLiN
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2016
            • 159

            #6
            I wonder how big a fine they gonna pay if they release their chrome adblocker in 6 months, after a thousand ad networks will shut down.

            Comment

            • SpicyM
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2006
              • 4575

              #7
              hahahaha
              no sig, sorry

              Comment

              • Bladewire
                StraightBro
                • Aug 2003
                • 56228

                #8
                Originally posted by Paul Markham
                It's Googles site, are the EU now telling Google what they can or can not put on their site?
                Yes.

                Just like Visa/MasterCard tells you what you can put on your site.

                Just like your host tells you what you can put on your site.


                Skype: CallTomNow

                Comment

                • Barry-xlovecam
                  It's 42
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 18083

                  #9
                  Originally posted by LeMeLiN
                  I wonder how big a fine they gonna pay if they release their chrome adblocker in 6 months, after a thousand ad networks will shut down.
                  AdWords sales will go up a lot more than any fine.
                  Ad networks will need to create ads that wont be blocked -- the strong and smartest will survive.

                  Comment

                  • MaDalton
                    I am Amazing Content!
                    • Feb 2004
                    • 39861

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Paul Markham
                    It's Googles site, are the EU now telling Google what they can or can not put on their site?
                    let's say you have an online store selling shoes and your potential customers never find you because Google always puts their shopping results on top of you when people look for what you are selling.

                    clearer now?
                    AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                    Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                    Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                    Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                    Comment

                    • SpicyM
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 4575

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Paul Markham
                      It's Googles site, are the EU now telling Google what they can or can not put on their site?

                      Antimonopoly laws - they have their purpose. Fuck Google.
                      no sig, sorry

                      Comment

                      • CoolMikey
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jun 2017
                        • 174

                        #12
                        Originally posted by StefanG
                        let's say you have an online store selling shoes and your potential customers never find you because Google always puts their shopping results on top of you when people look for what you are selling.

                        clearer now?
                        No it's not any clearer. Google doesn't have monopoly power for online search, there are dozens of alternatives, some better than others, so customer has a choice, they just happen to choose google because it offers the best user experience.

                        This whole thing is kinda like going back 15 years in time and attempting to fine thehun for not listing your galleries.

                        Comment

                        • MaDalton
                          I am Amazing Content!
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 39861

                          #13
                          Originally posted by CoolMikey
                          No it's not any clearer. Google doesn't have monopoly power for online search, there are dozens of alternatives, some better than others, so customer has a choice, they just happen to choose google because it offers the best user experience.

                          This whole thing is kinda like going back 15 years in time and attempting to fine thehun for not listing your galleries.
                          you obviously don't understand the lawsuit
                          AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                          Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                          Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                          Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                          Comment

                          • blackmonsters
                            Making PHP work
                            • Nov 2002
                            • 20961

                            #14
                            Originally posted by LeMeLiN
                            I wonder how big a fine they gonna pay if they release their chrome adblocker in 6 months, after a thousand ad networks will shut down.
                            Now this is a legit question.

                            Chrome will not block "good ads".

                            Free Open Source Live Aggregated Cams Script (FOSLACS)

                            Comment

                            • Barry-xlovecam
                              It's 42
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 18083

                              #15
                              . Search Engine Market Share in Europe 2016 ... Google, 91.92%

                              That is an almost, damn close monopoly
                              gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/europe/2016

                              Comment

                              • CoolMikey
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jun 2017
                                • 174

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                                . Search Engine Market Share in Europe 2016 ... Google, 91.92%

                                That is an almost, damn close monopoly
                                gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/europe/2016
                                "A monopoly exists when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity."

                                Clearly, google is not the only supplier of search on the net, there are dozens of alternatives, they just happen to be the most popular.

                                Comment

                                • SpicyM
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2006
                                  • 4575

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                  they just happen to be the most popular.
                                  Yes and they misuse that position... which is unlawful.
                                  no sig, sorry

                                  Comment

                                  • SpicyM
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Aug 2006
                                    • 4575

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                    "A monopoly exists when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity."

                                    Clearly, google is not the only supplier of search on the net, there are dozens of alternatives, they just happen to be the most popular.


                                    Abuse of Monopoly Power

                                    Chapter 2 of the Competition Act states it is illegal for a dominant firm to abuse its monopoly power.

                                    Firstly the OFT must investigate whether firms have a dominant position they will look at:

                                    National or regional market share. Usually a firm would have to have at least 40% of the market to be considered to be a dominant firm.



                                    Abuse of Monopoly Power | Economics Help

                                    Enjoy reading..
                                    no sig, sorry

                                    Comment

                                    • SpicyM
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2006
                                      • 4575

                                      #19
                                      Definition of Monopoly:

                                      A pure monopoly is defined as a single seller of a product, i.e. 100% of market share.

                                      In the UK a firm is said to have monopoly power if it has more than 25% of the market share. For example, Tesco @30% market share or Google 90% of search engine traffic.



                                      Monopoly | Economics Help

                                      This is for UK but such laws are everywhere.
                                      no sig, sorry

                                      Comment

                                      • CoolMikey
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jun 2017
                                        • 174

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by SpicyM
                                        Definition of Monopoly:

                                        A pure monopoly is defined as a single seller of a product, i.e. 100% of market share.

                                        In the UK a firm is said to have monopoly power if it has more than 25% of the market share. For example, Tesco @30% market share or Google 90% of search engine traffic.





                                        This is for UK but such laws are everywhere.
                                        "The Contestability of the market. If barriers to entry are low then the incumbent firm is unlikely to be dominant even with a high market share because new firms can enter if profits are high."

                                        There are dozens of competitors in the search space showing that "barriers to entry are low", consumers can easily switch to another search engine, etc, so I wouldn't agree they have "dominant" position.

                                        Facebook is a 100x better example of "dominant". "Network effect" prevents competitors from easily entering the market, users can't easily switch to another social network, because the whole point is that friends need to be on the same network, etc.

                                        Google really has very little power, I can switch to bing or some other search engine within 2 clicks and never visit google again, so I don't see how they are "dominant".

                                        Comment

                                        • SpicyM
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2006
                                          • 4575

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                          "The Contestability of the market. If barriers to entry are low then the incumbent firm is unlikely to be dominant even with a high market share because new firms can enter if profits are high."

                                          There are dozens of competitors in the search space showing that "barriers to entry are low", consumers can easily switch to another search engine, etc, so I wouldn't agree they have "dominant" position.

                                          Facebook is a 100x better example of "dominant". "Network effect" prevents competitors from easily entering the market, users can't easily switch to another social network, because the whole point is that friends need to be on the same network, etc.
                                          So with over 90% of market share, you don't agree they are dominant?

                                          It is defined by EU law, it doesn't matter what you or someone else considers a monopoly.

                                          IMO .. Google is the prime example of uber monopoly. They even used them as an example.
                                          no sig, sorry

                                          Comment

                                          • CoolMikey
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jun 2017
                                            • 174

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by SpicyM
                                            IMO .. Google is the prime example of uber monopoly. They even used them as an example.
                                            How can something be a monopoly if it takes 2 clicks to switch to for example bing, an essentially identical product?

                                            Good layman's definition of monopoly is "if they have you by the balls, then they are a monopoly, otherwise not", clearly google doesn't meet that definition, if google pissed me off, I could switch to bing and my life would be no different.

                                            Comment

                                            • SpicyM
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2006
                                              • 4575

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                              "The Contestability of the market. If barriers to entry are low then the incumbent firm is unlikely to be dominant even with a high market share because new firms can enter if profits are high."

                                              There are dozens of competitors in the search space showing that "barriers to entry are low", consumers can easily switch to another search engine, etc, so I wouldn't agree they have "dominant" position.

                                              Facebook is a 100x better example of "dominant". "Network effect" prevents competitors from easily entering the market, users can't easily switch to another social network, because the whole point is that friends need to be on the same network, etc.

                                              Google really has very little power, I can switch to bing or some other search engine within 2 clicks and never visit google again, so I don't see how they are "dominant".
                                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe...e_of_dominance

                                              More reading for you..

                                              First it is necessary to determine whether a firm is dominant, or whether it behaves "to an appreciable extent independently of its competitors, customers and ultimately of its consumer."

                                              Under EU law, very large market shares raise a presumption that a firm is dominant, which may be rebuttable. If a firm has a dominant position, because it has beyond a 39.7% market share then there is "a special responsibility not to allow its conduct to impair competition on the common market"


                                              With over 90% no one can doubt they are fucking dominant, jesus
                                              no sig, sorry

                                              Comment

                                              • Bladewire
                                                StraightBro
                                                • Aug 2003
                                                • 56228

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                                How can something be a monopoly if it takes 2 clicks to switch to for example bing, an essentially identical product?

                                                Good layman's definition of monopoly is "if they have you by the balls, then they are a monopoly, otherwise not", clearly google doesn't meet that definition, if google pissed me off, I could switch to bing and my life would be no different.
                                                I see.

                                                You're trying to get post count up by pretending not to be able to read.

                                                Why waste our time? So you can get 3 cents a post? At least earn it by listening and responding accordingly please


                                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                                Comment

                                                • baddog
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Apr 2001
                                                  • 107089

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                  Yes.

                                                  Just like Visa/MasterCard tells you what you can put on your site.

                                                  Just like your host tells you what you can put on your site.
                                                  WRONG! again.

                                                  Visa/MC and your host may tell you you cannot have illegal content, but they never tell you what legal ads you can present OR the placement on the page.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • wehateporn
                                                    Promoting Debate on GFY
                                                    • Apr 2007
                                                    • 27176

                                                    #26
                                                    To put is simply a monopoly will produce less of a good and charge a higher price for it than in a competitive market. This is bad for consumers because there is less of a product and it costs more. In a theoretical perfectly competitive market, price and output are set by the supply and demand.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • oppoten
                                                      NAME THE JEW
                                                      • Nov 2007
                                                      • 4793

                                                      #27
                                                      Sergey Bris and Larry Brin ought to take their little rat faces and scurry off to Israel while they can

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Bladewire
                                                        StraightBro
                                                        • Aug 2003
                                                        • 56228

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by wehateporn
                                                        To put is simply a monopoly will produce less of a good and charge a higher price for it than in a competitive market. This is bad for consumers because there is less of a product and it costs more. In a theoretical perfectly competitive market, price and output are set by the supply and demand.
                                                        Is Google a conspiracy?


                                                        Skype: CallTomNow

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Paul Markham
                                                          Too old to care
                                                          • Jun 2001
                                                          • 52942

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                          Yes.

                                                          Just like Visa/MasterCard tells you what you can put on your site.

                                                          Just like your host tells you what you can put on your site.
                                                          Tumblr exclude kids from porn, Youtube won't allow porn, etc.



                                                          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Paul Markham
                                                            Too old to care
                                                            • Jun 2001
                                                            • 52942

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                                                            AdWords sales will go up a lot more than any fine.
                                                            Ad networks will need to create ads that wont be blocked -- the strong and smartest will survive.
                                                            Aren't Adwords governed by what people can pay?



                                                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Paul Markham
                                                              Too old to care
                                                              • Jun 2001
                                                              • 52942

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by StefanG
                                                              let's say you have an online store selling shoes and your potential customers never find you because Google always puts their shopping results on top of you when people look for what you are selling.

                                                              clearer now?
                                                              So use Bing or Yahoo. It's their search engine and they have no duty to put sites to the top.



                                                              Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                              PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Paul Markham
                                                                Too old to care
                                                                • Jun 2001
                                                                • 52942

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                                                No it's not any clearer. Google doesn't have monopoly power for online search, there are dozens of alternatives, some better than others, so customer has a choice, they just happen to choose google because it offers the best user experience.

                                                                This whole thing is kinda like going back 15 years in time and attempting to fine thehun for not listing your galleries.
                                                                ^^^^

                                                                It's an outside influence, the EU, dictating to a company that has got to the top by delivering what the consumer wants.



                                                                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                Comment

                                                                • NewNick
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Mar 2009
                                                                  • 7229

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                  ^^^^

                                                                  It's an outside influence, the EU, dictating to a company that has got to the top by delivering what the consumer wants.
                                                                  Paul - people are using a search engine in good faith. They expect results that are relevant to their search.

                                                                  Google did not display the results labelled as "sponsored ads". They delivered the results as if a genuine search of the market place had occurred.

                                                                  This was a lie.
                                                                  "Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
                                                                  “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
                                                                  “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • wehateporn
                                                                    Promoting Debate on GFY
                                                                    • Apr 2007
                                                                    • 27176

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                                    Is Google a conspiracy?
                                                                    Every company wants a monopoly, but yeah they will likely rank sites based on what helps their own profits, while telling you it's all about quality

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • pimpmaster9000
                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                      • Dec 2011
                                                                      • 26732

                                                                      #35
                                                                      it does not make any difference if google users are voluntary or not, the only thing that matters is the market share...if market share greater than specific amount = monopoly....if monopoly = monopoly laws...
                                                                      Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • MaDalton
                                                                        I am Amazing Content!
                                                                        • Feb 2004
                                                                        • 39861

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                        So use Bing or Yahoo. It's their search engine and they have no duty to put sites to the top.
                                                                        you have no idea what the lawsuit is about
                                                                        AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                                                        Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                                                        Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                                                        Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • CarlosTheGaucho
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Oct 2005
                                                                          • 9555

                                                                          #37
                                                                          A very interesting lawsuit and an important precedent coming up.
                                                                          Need hosting, cloud, CDN or solutions for your AI? Go faster while saving with The Last Host you'll ever need!| Double Impact PR | Telegram carl_boro | Read My Educational Series | Read my Adult Biz Chronicles|

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • CoolMikey
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Jun 2017
                                                                            • 174

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Another detail I forgot to mention is that their service happens to be completely free.

                                                                            So it's kinda like if I were to open a hamburger shop in my town that gave hamburgers away, with intention of making $$ on the beverages I sell. People would drive 100s of miles to take advantage of this new brilliant business plan I came up with, and obviously I would achieve high market share.

                                                                            Then some government bureaucrats would bitch and whine that my business is anti-competitive, that I have to give customers a balanced choice of beverages, that I'm not allowed to just sell my own Mikey's lemonade.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • SpicyM
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Aug 2006
                                                                              • 4575

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by NewNick
                                                                              Paul - people are using a search engine in good faith. They expect results that are relevant to their search.

                                                                              Google did not display the results labelled as "sponsored ads". They delivered the results as if a genuine search of the market place had occurred.

                                                                              This was a lie.
                                                                              Well said.. An explanation for idiots, yet most of them won't get it..
                                                                              no sig, sorry

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • SpicyM
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Aug 2006
                                                                                • 4575

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                                ^^^^

                                                                                It's an outside influence, the EU, dictating to a company that has got to the top by delivering what the consumer wants.

                                                                                No Paul, such laws exist in every capitalist country, not just EU.

                                                                                Without them we wouldn't have any competition, because the huge companies estalished in the beginning have the money and power to ruin any new company trying to touch their market share.

                                                                                Understand? These laws are actually fair and much needed.
                                                                                no sig, sorry

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • SpicyM
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Aug 2006
                                                                                  • 4575

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Microsoft is another monopoly fined by EU ..and not just once..

                                                                                  Microsoft hit with $730 million antitrust fine by EU
                                                                                  Microsoft hit with $730 million antitrust fine by EU - Mar. 6, 2013


                                                                                  Microsoft Corp v Commission
                                                                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micros...p_v_Commission


                                                                                  Cry me a river..
                                                                                  no sig, sorry

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Bladewire
                                                                                    StraightBro
                                                                                    • Aug 2003
                                                                                    • 56228

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                                                                    Another detail I forgot to mention is that their service happens to be completely free.

                                                                                    So it's kinda like if I were to open a hamburger shop in my town that gave hamburgers away, with intention of making $$ on the beverages I sell. People would drive 100s of miles to take advantage of this new brilliant business plan I came up with, and obviously I would achieve high market share.

                                                                                    Then some government bureaucrats would bitch and whine that my business is anti-competitive, that I have to give customers a balanced choice of beverages, that I'm not allowed to just sell my own Mikey's lemonade.
                                                                                    Their service isn't free, what are you 12?

                                                                                    You give personal data, surfing habits, their ability to read the contents of your email, and more, in exchange of using Google services.

                                                                                    Google is not free.


                                                                                    Skype: CallTomNow

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • CoolMikey
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jun 2017
                                                                                      • 174

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                                                      Their service isn't free, what are you 12?

                                                                                      You give personal data, surfing habits, their ability to read the contents of your email, and more, in exchange of using Google services.

                                                                                      Google is not free.
                                                                                      Around here, when no monetary cost is involved = "free".

                                                                                      By your logic, my free hamburger business wouldn't be "free" either, eh? Cause I would learn that John likes hamburgers with cheese, and that Jane always orders extra large fries, magically turning me giving away shit for "free", into "not free"?

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Naughty
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Jul 2001
                                                                                        • 6487

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                                                                        No it's not any clearer. Google doesn't have monopoly power for online search, there are dozens of alternatives, some better than others, so customer has a choice, they just happen to choose google because it offers the best user experience.

                                                                                        This whole thing is kinda like going back 15 years in time and attempting to fine thehun for not listing your galleries.
                                                                                        There is no alternative when Google has ~97% market share, you do not get that?

                                                                                        They literally put me out of business for a while after they suspended my account for no reason (their lawyer told me, but he could not do anything since Adwords is a separate entity) back in 2010. 8 years of building an honest Adwords business down the drain. A murderer gets a lower sentence here, for Google, it is suspended for life. Assholes. I wish they left overnight, still do (even though I have a new account on another business, which will never be at its full potential because I'm afraid they will put me and my family on the street).
                                                                                        seks.ai for sale - ping me

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Paul Markham
                                                                                          Too old to care
                                                                                          • Jun 2001
                                                                                          • 52942

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by NewNick
                                                                                          Paul - people are using a search engine in good faith. They expect results that are relevant to their search.

                                                                                          Google did not display the results labelled as "sponsored ads". They delivered the results as if a genuine search of the market place had occurred.

                                                                                          This was a lie.
                                                                                          Google is a free to use search engine, if it were paid for I would agree with your point. It's under no obligation to give user anything that it doesn't want.



                                                                                          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                                          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Paul Markham
                                                                                            Too old to care
                                                                                            • Jun 2001
                                                                                            • 52942

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                                                            Their service isn't free, what are you 12?

                                                                                            You give personal data, surfing habits, their ability to read the contents of your email, and more, in exchange of using Google services.

                                                                                            Google is not free.
                                                                                            Yes it is. Unless people want to pay to get their services to the top of the list. For the user, it's still free.



                                                                                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Paul Markham
                                                                                              Too old to care
                                                                                              • Jun 2001
                                                                                              • 52942

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by CoolMikey
                                                                                              Around here, when no monetary cost is involved = "free".

                                                                                              By your logic, my free hamburger business wouldn't be "free" either, eh? Cause I would learn that John likes hamburgers with cheese, and that Jane always orders extra large fries, magically turning me giving away shit for "free", into "not free"?
                                                                                              To the user it's free. So your analogy isn't right. To the advertisers, they can choose to pay to get a more favourable listing.



                                                                                              Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                                              PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • NewNick
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Mar 2009
                                                                                                • 7229

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                                                Google is a free to use search engine, if it were paid for I would agree with your point. It's under no obligation to give user anything that it doesn't want.
                                                                                                Deception is deception whatever the price.

                                                                                                Deception is deception whether my market share is 1% or 100%.

                                                                                                Its really not complicated.

                                                                                                "Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
                                                                                                “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
                                                                                                “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                Working...