General Jeff Sessions' testimony Tuesday 6/13

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • baddog
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 107089
    #51
    Originally posted by Rochard
    I don't see how this relates to our conversation, but since you bring it up.... Why exactly did Sessions meet with the Russians? Twenty-six other people on the Committee on Armed Services and ONLY Sessions met with the Russians.

    Why did Sessions meet with the Russians and what was discussed?
    What meeting was that?

    Here is the testimony you never heard.

    MANCHIN: To the best of your knowledge, did any of the following individuals meet with Russian officials at any point during the campaign? You can just go yes or no as I go down through the list: Paul Manafort.

    SESSIONS: Repeat that now.

    MANCHIN: To the best of your knowledge, sir, did any of these following individuals meet with Russian officials at any point during the campaign, and you can just yes or no on this: Paul Manafort.

    SESSIONS: I don't have any information that he has done so. He served as campaign chairman for a few months.

    MANCHIN: Steve Bannon.

    SESSIONS: I have no information that he did.

    MANCHIN: General Michael Flynn.

    SESSIONS: I don't recall it.

    MANCHIN: Reince Priebus?

    SESSIONS: I don't recall.

    MANCHIN: Steve Miller?

    SESSIONS: I don't recall him ever having such a conversation.

    MANCHIN: Corey Lewandowski.

    SESSIONS: I do not recall any of those individuals having any meeting with Russian officials.

    MANCHIN: Carter Page.

    SESSIONS: I don't know.
    Why should he know?

      Comment

      • pimpmaster9000
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Dec 2011
        • 26732
        #52
        We all know pooty rigged it...that's just how pooty is...
        Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

          Comment

          • bronco67
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Dec 2006
            • 29032
            #53
            When someone asks "Have you spoken with anyone in the Trump administration about the Russia investigation", and Sessions responds with a non answer such as "I can answer that question because it's part of a private conversation blah blah", that basically means:

            YES.

            Otherwise if the answer was NO, he would have said "No". So a non-answer makes it very clear what the real answer is.

            Same with Comey. When he says he'd rather discuss whether or not Trump campaign members colluded with Russians in a closed setting, that means "yes, there was collusion".

              Comment

              • Barry-xlovecam
                It's 42
                • Jun 2010
                • 18083
                #54
                I turned it off after a while -- Sessions was hurting my head with his run-a-rounds and his obfuscation of gobbledygook answers to direct questions. I can't say he is lying but I think he is not telling the whole truth of what he may know.

                  Comment

                  • beerptrol
                    Confirmed Asshole
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 12722
                    #55
                    They don't want to invoke executive privilege because it looks bad plus then they can take them to court to try and revoke it and we know how much winning Chump has had in court. So they come up with bullshit reason not to answer
                    “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
                    -- Ulysses S. Grant

                      Comment

                      • Bladewire
                        StraightBro
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 56228
                        #56
                        Originally posted by bronco67
                        when someone asks "have you spoken with anyone in the trump administration about the russia investigation", and sessions responds with a non answer such as "i can answer that question because it's part of a private conversation blah blah", that basically means:

                        Yes.

                        Otherwise if the answer was no, he would have said "no". So a non-answer makes it very clear what the real answer is.

                        Same with comey. When he says he'd rather discuss whether or not trump campaign members colluded with russians in a closed setting, that means "yes, there was collusion".
                        QfT ~ ~ ✌️👾


                        Skype: CallTomNow

                          Comment

                          • Rochard
                            Jägermeister Test Pilot
                            • Dec 2001
                            • 75733
                            #57
                            Originally posted by baddog
                            What meeting was that?
                            He met with the Russians twice. This has been confirmed.

                            Why did he meet with the Russian government? What was discussed? Was there someone from the State Department present? Was there notes taken during these two meetings? If there was, does the State Department have them? If the State Department doesn't have them, why not? If notes weren't taken, why? Wouldn't be standard and required to report and brief the State Department on any meeting on behalf of the United States with the Russian government?

                            Originally posted by baddog
                            Here is the testimony you never heard.

                            Why should he know?
                            That is the testimony I heard. Why should he know? Are you kidding me? Sessions is the Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department....

                            Are you seriously telling me that the man in charge of the Justice Department isn't fully aware of every aspect of the biggest legal case in the country no less the biggest legal case in the history of the United States?

                            Not to mention some of these is common knowledge.... We all saw the video footage of Flynn sitting at the same table with Putin, and the others have given speeches for RT....
                            Herschel Savage
                            Brooklyn, NY

                              Comment

                              • TheDynasty
                                See Signature
                                • Apr 2016
                                • 5882
                                #58
                                Try out WP-SCRIPT The Best Tube Script

                                  Comment

                                  • baddog
                                    So Fucking Banned
                                    • Apr 2001
                                    • 107089
                                    #59
                                    Originally posted by Rochard
                                    He met with the Russians twice. This has been confirmed.

                                    Why did he meet with the Russian government? What was discussed? Was there someone from the State Department present? Was there notes taken during these two meetings? If there was, does the State Department have them? If the State Department doesn't have them, why not? If notes weren't taken, why? Wouldn't be standard and required to report and brief the State Department on any meeting on behalf of the United States with the Russian government?



                                    That is the testimony I heard. Why should he know? Are you kidding me? Sessions is the Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department....

                                    Are you seriously telling me that the man in charge of the Justice Department isn't fully aware of every aspect of the biggest legal case in the country no less the biggest legal case in the history of the United States?

                                    Not to mention some of these is common knowledge.... We all saw the video footage of Flynn sitting at the same table with Putin, and the others have given speeches for RT....
                                    Is that why they call Marines jarheads?

                                    What specific meeting are you referring to? Look it up.

                                    And seriously dude; the question was, "To the best of your knowledge, did any of the following individuals meet with Russian officials at any point during the campaign?"

                                    HE WAS NOT AG DURING THE CAMPAIGN.

                                    Based on comments of Democrats during the questioning; if you see someone on a tradeshow floor, stop, shake hands and say anything, that qualifies as a meeting.

                                      Comment

                                      • crockett
                                        in a van by the river
                                        • May 2003
                                        • 76818
                                        #60
                                        Originally posted by Rochard
                                        He met with the Russians twice. This has been confirmed.

                                        Why did he meet with the Russian government? What was discussed? Was there someone from the State Department present? Was there notes taken during these two meetings? If there was, does the State Department have them? If the State Department doesn't have them, why not? If notes weren't taken, why? Wouldn't be standard and required to report and brief the State Department on any meeting on behalf of the United States with the Russian government?



                                        That is the testimony I heard. Why should he know? Are you kidding me? Sessions is the Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department....

                                        Are you seriously telling me that the man in charge of the Justice Department isn't fully aware of every aspect of the biggest legal case in the country no less the biggest legal case in the history of the United States?

                                        Not to mention some of these is common knowledge.... We all saw the video footage of Flynn sitting at the same table with Putin, and the others have given speeches for RT....
                                        Look we all know what is really important to find out.. Is kaspersky virus protection safe to install on your computer.. (this was literally Marco Rubio's most important questions during 2 of the House's investigation hearings)
                                        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                          Comment

                                          • Bladewire
                                            StraightBro
                                            • Aug 2003
                                            • 56228
                                            #61
                                            Originally posted by baddog
                                            Is that why they call Marines jarheads?
                                            You shouldn't post drunk. All you do is insult people and call names, that makes you useless.


                                            Skype: CallTomNow

                                              Comment

                                              • Bladewire
                                                StraightBro
                                                • Aug 2003
                                                • 56228
                                                #62
                                                Originally posted by Rochard
                                                He met with the Russians twice. This has been confirmed.

                                                Why did he meet with the Russian government? What was discussed? Was there someone from the State Department present? Was there notes taken during these two meetings? If there was, does the State Department have them? If the State Department doesn't have them, why not? If notes weren't taken, why? Wouldn't be standard and required to report and brief the State Department on any meeting on behalf of the United States with the Russian government?
                                                We'll never know because our attorney general doesn't remember his Russian conversations but can quote his Ukrainian ambassadors conversation word for word.

                                                AG Sessions said he's going to fight giving over any notes or his schedule too. Nothing to hide huh?

                                                Originally posted by Rochard
                                                That is the testimony I heard. Why should he know? Are you kidding me? Sessions is the Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department....

                                                Are you seriously telling me that the man in charge of the Justice Department isn't fully aware of every aspect of the biggest legal case in the country no less the biggest legal case in the history of the United States?

                                                Not to mention some of these is common knowledge.... We all saw the video footage of Flynn sitting at the same table with Putin, and the others have given speeches for RT....

                                                This is why it's obvious there's something BIG they are hiding. If the fucking AG of the United States of America, who works for the people, can't remember select conversations and meetings and refuses to discuss conversations with the president and handing over basic documents like notes or schedules, then he shouldnt be the fucking attorney general!

                                                Who the fuck wants to hide simple innocent conversations, notes and schedules with an ambassador? Something is really wrong with the Trump administration.


                                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                                  Comment

                                                  • baddog
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Apr 2001
                                                    • 107089
                                                    #63
                                                    Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                    handing over basic documents like notes or schedules, then he shouldnt be the fucking attorney general!

                                                    Who the fuck wants to hide simple innocent conversations, notes and schedules with an ambassador? Something is really wrong with the Trump administration.
                                                    What documentation did he refuse to turn over? He said he would.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Bladewire
                                                        StraightBro
                                                        • Aug 2003
                                                        • 56228
                                                        #64
                                                        Originally posted by baddog
                                                        What documentation did he refuse to turn over? He said he would.
                                                        No he didn't. Why are you lying? Responding to a question is not saying he'll hand over documents. You shouldn't post drunk dude

                                                        Sessions Won?t Commit To Further Testimony Or Handing Over Documents

                                                        ?Can we also get your commitment, since there will be questions about some of these meetings that took place or not, that we could get access to documents, or memoranda or your daybook or something?? Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the committee?s vice chairman, asked.

                                                        ?We?ll be glad to provide appropriate responses to your questions and review them carefully and try to be responsive,? Sessions replied.


                                                        Skype: CallTomNow

                                                          Comment

                                                          Previous 1 2 template Next
                                                          Working...